Post A Rewritten Version Of Your Topic And Objectives
Post A Rewritten Version Of Your Topic And Objectives For Your Trainin
Post a rewritten version of your topic and objectives for your training and development plan (originally submitted for the Week Two Exercise). Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts. Offer a peer critique for two classmates other than those you selected in Week Two. Include suggestions for improvement, questions you may have, ideas for sources, and so forth. The critique should be 200 to 250 words, include citations and references for the text, and include at least one scholarly source.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment calls for a revised version of the initial training and development plan, specifically focusing on refining the topic and objectives previously submitted in Week Two. The purpose of this task is to enhance clarity, specificity, and alignment with organizational needs or learning outcomes. When rewriting, it is essential to clearly articulate the core theme of the training, ensuring that the objectives are measurable, achievable, and directly related to the overall goals of the program. This revision process encourages critical reflection on what the training aims to accomplish and how success will be evaluated, leading to a more focused and impactful plan.
Additionally, the assignment emphasizes engagement with peer critiques. Students are expected to review at least two classmates’ posts, providing constructive feedback that points out strengths and areas for improvement. The critique should be between 200 and 250 words and incorporate evidentiary support, such as citations from scholarly sources, to bolster the suggestions made. The inclusion of at least one peer-reviewed reference promotes academic rigor and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of effective training design.
The purpose of peer feedback is to foster collaborative learning and refine each student’s training plan through the exchange of ideas and best practices. Suggestions might include clarifying objectives, aligning activities with desired outcomes, or incorporating new instructional strategies. Questions could prompt consideration of different training modalities or assessment methods, aiming to deepen the quality of the original plan. Overall, this exercise underscores the importance of precise goal-setting in training development and the value of peer review as a formative element in professional growth.
References
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Grove, S. K., & Gray, J. R. (2018). Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence-based practice. Elsevier.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Noe, R. A. (2020). Employee training and development. McGraw-Hill Education.
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74-101.
Tannenbaum, S. I., & Yukl, G. (2017). Training and development in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 101-121.
Wang, X., & Haggerty, J. (2017). Designing effective training programs: A practical guide. Journal of Organizational Learning & Leadership, 3(1), 45-59.
Yamnill, S., & McLean, G. N. (2001). Theories supporting knowledge management implementation of Training transfer. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 181-198.