Post By Day 4a: Brief Description Of Human Rights Violations ✓ Solved

Post By Day 4a Brief Description Of The Human Rights Violation You Sel

Post by Day 4 a brief description of the human rights violation you selected. Then explain how one community (international, national, or local) might or did respond to the human rights violation. Be specific and use examples to illustrate your explanation. Note: Identify the human rights violation you selected in the first line of your post. Respond to a colleague who selected a human rights violation different than the one you selected.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Human rights violations are persistent issues that affect populations worldwide, undermining dignity, freedom, and justice. In this paper, I will discuss the human rights violation of forced child labor, analyze how a specific community responded, and illustrate the response with relevant examples.

Brief Description of Forced Child Labor

Forced child labor involves the exploitation of children under coercion, deception, or abuse to perform work that endangers their health, hampers their education, or deprives them of their childhood. This violation often occurs in industries such as agriculture, manufacturing, and domestic work, predominantly in developing countries. According to the International Labour Organization (ILO, 2020), over 152 million children are victims of child labor globally, with a significant portion subjected to forced labor conditions.

This violation infringes on several fundamental human rights, including the right to education, the right to protection from exploitation, and the right to health. Children subjected to forced labor experience physical and psychological harm, restricting their development and future opportunities (Bourdillon et al., 2010).

Community Response to Child Labor

In response to forced child labor, national governments, international organizations, and local communities have taken various initiatives aimed at prevention, intervention, and eradication of this violation.

One notable community response is the legislation enacted by the Government of Bangladesh. Recognizing the severity of child labor, Bangladesh's government implemented the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act in 2013, which bans children under 14 from employment and regulates working conditions for older children (Bangladesh Labour Act, 2013). This legal framework was complemented by enforcement mechanisms, including inspections and penalties for violations.

International organizations such as the ILO and UNICEF have also played pivotal roles through awareness campaigns, funding, and technical support. The ILO's International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC) partners with governments and local NGOs to develop community awareness programs, provide education alternatives, and enforce laws against child labor (ILO, 2020).

On the ground, several NGOs operate rescue and rehabilitation programs for child laborers. For example, the NGO ActionAid Bangladesh runs community-based initiatives that offer education, vocational training, and psychosocial support to rescued children, aiming to reintegrate them into society and prevent re-entry into exploitative labor (ActionAid, 2019).

Furthermore, community involvement is crucial in combating forced child labor. Local leaders, teachers, and community members participate in awareness campaigns to educate families about their children's rights. For example, in the Sundarbans region, local villagers and teachers collaborate with NGOs to identify at-risk children, enforce local laws, and ensure access to schools (Khan et al., 2018).

Examples of Community Impact

In the Indian state of Bihar, community-led initiatives have significantly reduced instances of child labor. The "Child Labour Free Village" program mobilizes local stakeholders—teachers, police, and parents—to monitor child labor activities actively. The program provides alternative income sources to families and facilitates access to primary education, effectively decreasing child labor rates (Sharma et al., 2019).

Similarly, in West Africa, child labor eradication initiatives have incorporated community participation, leading to sustainable change. The local community patrols and speaks out against forced child labor practices in cocoa plantations, leading to government crackdowns and corporate commitments to eliminate child labor from supply chains (UNICEF, 2021).

Conclusion

The human rights violation of forced child labor remains a complex challenge requiring coordinated responses at multiple levels. Communities play a crucial role in addressing this issue through legislation, awareness, and active participation in enforcement. Examples from Bangladesh, Bihar, and West Africa demonstrate that community involvement, combined with national policies and international support, can significantly reduce forced child labor and promote children's rights.

References

  • ActionAid. (2019). Child protection programs in Bangladesh. ActionAid Reports.
  • Bangladesh Labour Act. (2013). Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act. Government of Bangladesh.
  • Bourdillon, M., et al. (2010). Children's work, children's rights: The international journal of child labor and human rights.
  • International Labour Organization (ILO). (2020). Global estimates of child labour. ILO Publications.
  • Khan, S. et al. (2018). Community-led child protection in Bangladesh. Journal of Development Studies.
  • Sharma, R., et al. (2019). Reducing child labor through community-based interventions. Indian Journal of Social Work.
  • UNICEF. (2021). Child labour eradication in West Africa. UNICEF Reports.