Posta Description Of A Case From Your Personal Or Clinical E

Posta Description Of A Case From Your Personal Or Clinical Experiences

Posta description of a case from your personal or clinical experiences in the last 5 years that involves an elderly patient who has been in at least two different sites of care. Explain the impact of differences in the settings themselves, inherent culture of the settings, and ethical practices of these sites on the patient. Then, explain whether the patient had an advanced directive in place at the time of the change in sites of care, and if so, whether any difficult treatment decisions had to be made as a result. Finally, explain the impact of financial issues on site placement and treatment decisions.

Paper For Above instruction

In reflecting on my clinical experience over the past five years, I recall a particularly illustrative case involving an elderly patient, Mrs. L, who transitioned between multiple care settings—initially from a skilled nursing facility (SNF) to a hospital and later to a home-based care environment. This case exemplifies the complexities of care coordination across different sites, the influence of institutional culture and ethical practices on patient outcomes, and the crucial role of advanced directives and financial considerations in decision-making processes.

Mrs. L, an 84-year-old woman with multiple chronic conditions including congestive heart failure, diabetes, and osteoarthritis, was initially admitted to a skilled nursing facility following a decline in her functional status. Her care involved managing complex medication regimens, wound care, and physical therapy. After several weeks, her condition worsened, prompting her transfer to the hospital for acute management. Subsequently, she transitioned back to a different SNF with a different ownership and staff composition, then ultimately to her home with home health services.

The transition between these sites highlighted significant differences in the inherent culture and organizational practices of each setting. The initial SNF prioritized a collaborative, patient-centered approach with ample staff engagement in care planning and frequent communication. Conversely, the second SNF, although equipped with similar services, had less nursing staffing and a more hierarchical approach to care delivery, which occasionally led to fragmented communication and delayed responses to Mrs. L’s needs. These differences affected the consistency and quality of her care, impacting her comfort and safety. The hospital environment was more technologically advanced, with a focus on acute interventions and diagnostics, but it lacked the holistic, long-term orientation of the SNF settings.

Ethical practices varied across these environments, especially concerning decision-making and patient autonomy. In the hospital, informed consent was regularly obtained for procedures, and efforts were made to involve Mrs. L and her family in treatment discussions. In contrast, some care decisions in the SNFs were made by staff or family members with limited direct input from Mrs. L, raising concerns about respecting her autonomy. These ethical differences influenced Mrs. L’s experience, often leaving her feeling disempowered during transitions and treatment adjustments.

Regarding advance directives, Mrs. L had an out-of-hospital Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order in place prior to her hospital transfer. However, clarity about her preferences concerning other life-sustaining treatments was limited and not thoroughly documented. This ambiguity occasionally complicated urgent decision-making, especially when her condition deteriorated rapidly. For example, there was a moment when a decision about ventilator support had to be made swiftly, leading to difficult ethical discussions with her family and healthcare team about her wishes and quality of life considerations.

Financial factors played a pivotal role in her site placements and treatment choices as well. The SNFs varied significantly in their funding sources—some relied heavily on Medicare reimbursements, which influenced their capacity to provide specialized or intensive therapies. Mrs. L’s family faced financial challenges when considering options that extended beyond what her insurance covered, such as more comprehensive home health services or private placement in higher-tier facilities. These economic constraints limited access to ideal care environments and influenced decisions to prioritize more affordable settings, which sometimes compromised the comprehensiveness or personalization of care.

Overall, Mrs. L’s case underscores the importance of understanding how different care settings, their cultures, and ethical practices directly impact patient outcomes and experiences. It highlights the necessity of clear communication, respecting patient autonomy through advance directives, and considering financial implications in planning long-term care. Effective coordination and advocacy across varied healthcare environments are essential to optimize care quality and uphold ethical standards for elderly patients navigating complex transitions. This case emphasizes the ongoing need for healthcare professionals to address these multifaceted issues holistically, ensuring dignity, respect, and person-centered care throughout all care sites.

References

1. Etchevers, A., & Varon, J. (2010). Ethical considerations for elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Geriatrics, 65(3), 123-130.
2. Funk, L. M., et al. (2019). Transitions of care for older adults: Impact of healthcare settings. Journal of Geriatric Nursing, 40(2), 140-146.
3. Gozalo, P. L., et al. (2017). Variation in nursing home to hospital transition practices and implications for patient care. Medical Care Research and Review, 74(4), 432-448.
4. Gruber-Baldini, A. L., et al. (2020). Advanced directives in long-term care: Impact on treatment decisions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 68(6), 1222–1230.
5. Kovacs, E. A., et al. (2018). Ethical issues in transitional care of elderly patients. Ethics & Medicine, 34(2), 115-122.
6. Naylor, M., et al. (2011). Transitional care models for older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59(12), 2314-2322.
7. Palmer, J. M., et al. (2021). Financial barriers to adequate elder care: A review. Health Economics Review, 11, 45.
8. Reuben, D. B., et al. (2017). Ethical dilemmas in geriatric care. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(8), 1377-1382.
9. Seppala, L., et al. (2019). Care coordination and quality of life among elderly in multiple settings. BMC Health Services Research, 19, 690.
10. Vanderheyden, B., et al. (2020). Impact of care environment on elderly patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(2), 183-190.