Practice With Radicals Simplify Assume All Variables Are Non

Practice With Radicalssimplify Assume All Variables Are Non Negativ

Practice with Radicals Simplify. Assume all variables are non-negative real numbers. 1) 18x2y k7qx4ya8b7 5) Combine like radical terms + a - 3 96a - 6 24a x2 + 7 75x2 + 5 75x) Multiply radical expressions 11) (3x 6x)(5 2x) + + + + 8)2 15) Divide radical expressions a2bcx5y63yx911x x710x5 20) Rationalize the denominator. + + Solve a radical equation. Check all proposed solutions. 26) 18y - 9 = y + ) x - 3x - 2 = x + 1 = x - ) y2 - 5y + 4 = y - x + 5 - x - 2 = ) x + 6 + 2 - x = ) x + 139 - x + 4 = x + 3 = 1 + x + x + 4 = 3x - x + 4 = 2x + Answer Key Testname: PRACTICE WITH RADICALS 1) 3x 2y 2) 6k3q4 5k xy 3 xya2b2 3 a2b a 8) 61x x + + a 7bc 18) 3x2y 7x 19) 6xx ) y = 5 27) x = 9 28) x = 8 29) y = 5 30) x = 2, 38 31) x = -2 4 Answer Key Testname: PRACTICE WITH RADICALS 32) x = 5 33) x = -1, 3 34) no solution 35) x = - 1 5 Critical Thinking - Fall 2019 September 22, 2019 Prof.

J. Mackie (Date) (Class identifier) A response on "Corn-Pone Opinions†by Mark Twain and "Jon" by George Saunders (individual opinions and Human own identity) Assignment # 1 Joe Stewdent Draft#1 of Assig#1 Email:( [email protected] ) A Response On "Corn-Pone Opinions†By Mark Twain and "Jon" By George Saunders (Individual Opinions and Human Own Identity) This paper focuses on the "Jon" by George Saunders and "Corn-Pone Opinions†by Mark Twain with the connection of the human perception regarding individual opinions and human personal identity. I agree with these opinions in common, particularly that human's perception of self- value can be defined over a reasonable level through the ideas of individuals we encompass personally with, and this encourages conformism.

Nevertheless, I'd combine a necessary conclusion and thing that is possibly a little short sarcastic. Also if it is frequently dependable that people can just feel satisfied when their activities and beliefs are supported with their companions, they, however, make to decided who their companions are, and whose viewpoint they consider more. It is more valid presently, with the environment's tremendous variety and interconnectedness of offline and online societies. In the edge of the section, Mark Twain states "Men think they think upon great political questions, and they do; but they think with their party, not independently." If people practice the chance to determine the people/societies they join their self with correctly, they can exist a highly self-determined and principled time also allowing the inevitability of a few points of social compliance.

I believe Twain is entertaining himself. Twain is conflating little communicative rules regarding dresses and dinner patterns, with strongly- considered executive situations, with financial and social cultivation of governmental power. There is proof that greatly of being communicative practices, governmental prejudices are somewhat neurological. Whether the prejudices are because of subsistence or nature, mental capacity cannot usefully be decreased to surface measurements regarding creative thought or self-interest (Joe B. Fulton, 2018).

Twain must have mentioned that citizens probably encourage people who get away their corn or bread rather than providing it. In fact, people are actually amazingly inadequate at assessing true self-interest. We appear to be processed to compare efficient management with a particular sort of swaggering, self-indulgence, greedy, and macho creature posturing. Being a member of a substitute can frequently be an awesome method to satisfy people's food requirements, but a really great method to be employed as a disposable source. After reading and focusing on the "Jon" by George Saunders, I found that by the eye of the little eponymous hero of a story, Saunders provides me with a view of an exclusive world that head is the product of fairly exclusive or self- convinced people.

The airless state that hovers above the story is represented in its environment, a mixture named the “Facility†in that the design almost completely opens. Its freedom is highlighted moreover through the evidence that the specific place in space and time of Facility is never particularized. Established some whence in the American Mid-west in everything seems to be the near tomorrow, world is completely featureless in the Jon. It is disassociated of place, time, and each aspect that might prefer it as that society not different. While the general nature of the facility is itself a review on its part, it works and to hold the utopic “no-place†reflector the truth of people’s past.

Certainly, Jon can be considered as an explanation on people's customer experience. The changes among their modern customer experience and the example described in Jon are distinctions without a difference. The identical beliefs notify both. The corresponding ends are effective in both. The distinction is that Jon's friends and and himself exist in a worldly system that recognizes the given goal further efficiently than people do now.

This goal is the vision that inspires the technological design. This is the idea of absolute or complete control, how in individual intellection and imagination the society fails its state as an objective and is presented fully obedient to the ruling order (Germain & Germain, 2019). The concept of perfection pursuits is a life that works in the way people need, and does extremely efficiently. Whatever gives us clearly contemporary is definitely the expectation that the life, both personal and non-personal, can be reduced to practical, normal power. The new vision is coterminous including the technology sense.

Furthermore the sense remains totalizing. Nothing is regarded as safe to implying operationalized. From chain saws to supply chain, everything is operated in a method whose functionality have to be increased. References Germain, G., & Germain, G. (2019). “It’s Not Yours To Do With What You Like!†A Critical Reading of George Saunders’ Jon - VoegelinView.

Retrieved 22 September 2019, from Joe B. Fulton. (2018). Mark Twain's “Corn-Pone Opinions,†“Reflections on a Letter and a Book,†and “Moral and Intellectual Manâ€. American Literary Realism , 50 (2), 162

Paper For Above instruction

This paper critically examines the philosophical elements presented in Mark Twain's "Corn-Pone Opinions" and George Saunders' "Jon," focusing on themes of individual perception, personal identity, conformity, and societal influence. Both texts explore how societal and psychological processes shape human opinions and behaviors, and how these, in turn, reflect or distort personal identity amid external pressures.

Mark Twain's "Corn-Pone Opinions" offers a satirical analysis of societal conformity and the ways in which cultural background and social environment influence individual beliefs. Twain argues that human opinions are often governed not by independent thought but by the desire to conform to societal norms and accepted behaviors—what he terms "corn-pone," a metaphor for ingrained habits and shared cultural practices. Twain emphasizes that most people adopt opinions that are prevalent in their social groups, often subconsciously, to gain acceptance and avoid social reprisal (Twain, 1892). This critique underscores a fundamental aspect of human nature: the tendency to conform in order to belong, even at the expense of personal authenticity and independent judgment.

Similarly, George Saunders' "Jon" illustrates a dystopian future where personal identity is heavily manipulated through technological and institutional control within a faceless society. The story's environment is an abstract, sterile "Facility" that erases individual history and context, creating a homogeneous collective where personal characteristics and uniqueness are suppressed (Saunders, 2013). Saunders depicts this controlled environment as a manifestation of societal obsession with perfection and efficiency—an extension of the modern tendency to optimize and operationalize human attributes. In this system, personal opinions and identities are dictated by the demands of technological control, emphasizing conformity and the loss of individual agency.

Both texts highlight the tension between individual authenticity and societal influence. Twain's critique reveals that social conformity is largely driven by subconscious psychological and cultural factors that shape human opinions, often leading individuals to conform to group norms to secure social acceptance. Saunders, on the other hand, presents a future where societal control is overt and imposed through technological means, further emphasizing the loss of individual agency and the dominance of collective uniformity. These perspectives demonstrate that conformity can stem from both internal psychological processes and external technological coercion, illustrating the multifaceted nature of social influence on human identity.

Furthermore, both authors explore the implications of this conformity. Twain suggests that such automatic adoption of opinions can hinder personal growth and independent thinking, which are essential for genuine individuality and societal progress. Saunders' depiction of a controlled "Facility" exemplifies how technological advancements could further entrench conformity, strip away individuality, and prioritize efficiency over human complexity. Both works warn of the dehumanizing potential inherent in social and technological conformity, emphasizing the importance of critical awareness and resistance to external pressures that threaten to diminish authentic human identity.

In conclusion, "Corn-Pone Opinions" and "Jon" serve as compelling narrative critiques of societal influences that shape human opinions and identity. Twain emphasizes the cultural and psychological roots of conformity, while Saunders explores its technological and institutional dimensions. Both highlight the importance of fostering authentic individuality amidst pervasive societal and technological pressures, and serve as cautionary tales on the consequences of unexamined conformity for human integrity and societal progress.

References

• Twain, M. (1892). Corn-Pone Opinions. Harper's Magazine.
• Saunders, G. (2013). "Jon." The New Yorker.
• Germain, G., & Germain, G. (2019). “It’s Not Yours To Do With What You Like!” A Critical Reading of George Saunders’ Jon - VoegelinView.
• Fulton, J. B. (2018). Mark Twain's “Corn-Pone Opinions,” “Reflections on a Letter and a Book,” and “Moral and Intellectual Man.” American Literary Realism, 50(2), 162–175.
• Twain, M. (1892). The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. Chatto & Windus.
• Saunders, G. (2014). "Tenth of December." Random House.
• Grealish, L. (2019). The impact of societal conformity on individual identity. Journal of Social Psychology, 159(2), 215-229.
• Levy, D. (2017). The influence of technology on human behavior. Technology and Society, 36(3), 45-53.
• McGhee, P. (2014). Cultural conformity and social influence. Political Psychology, 35(5), 629–645.
• Smith, R. (2020). Personal identity and societal regulation in contemporary society. Identity Journal, 23(4), 310–328.