Preparation For Generating A Policy Proposal

Preparation For Generating A Policy Proposal

PREPARATION FOR GENERATING A POLICY PROPOSAL Annotated Bibliography: Texting and Using Handheld Phones while Driving STUDENT NAME INSTITUTION Annotated Bibliography: Texting and using Handheld Phones while Driving Stefan, K. (2012). Distracted Driving. New York: John Wiley and Sons The book investigates the causes of distracted driving, which is related to the use of handsets, navigation systems, eating while driving, as well as their repercussions. The impact of cell phone use on vision is specifically discussed in the third unit, providing information on the various distractors on the road, and comparing the fatalness of their consequences. The author is keen in giving alternative ways in which motorists can avoid distractions on the road such as paying attention, and above all avoiding the use of handheld devices while on the steering wheel.

Sample size used was appropriate and conclusions were highly accurate. This book influenced my ideas about the paper through a provision of various considerations on the numerous ways that can be used to avoid detractions, and also considering the result of carefulness which ultimately leads to loss avoidance. National Safety Council. Distracted Driving Prevention. Retrieved from: This article investigates the impact distractions have on drivers, as well as the numerous consequences that are faced as a result of negligence on the road. The studies were conducted using statistical data dated back to 2012, with the sample size being the number of vehicles involved in any form of accident in the current and previous year. This was conducted in the real world, with the major targeted population being drunk drivers, to obtain their percentages. The methodological considerations used may affect the research findings and conclusions drawn from them, putting in mind that sample size used may not be effective due to its large size, while the data needed is of a small population. This influenced my own ideas about the paper, since alcoholism in driving is what leads to major loss of lives and road accidents. Kenneth, B. & Ralph, S. (2010). Succeeding with Technology. London: Cengage Learning publishers. The book is keen to specify that cell phone use cannot be compared to drunk driving. However, both are a clear form of distraction to motorists and other road users. On the other hand, cell phone using can be highly controlled, considering it is only an embraced habit, as well as alcoholism. Both have detrimental effects to road users and cause the highest number of road accidents. Traditional distractions as well as cellphone use are the same especially in consideration to the consequences involved with them. Page 290 of the book clearly defines the driving distractions, both personal inflicted and accidental ones. The major aspect of investigation is the actions the government is taking to ensure that road distractions are banned for the safety of all. The study was conducted in seventeen states, which was highly appropriate for accuracy purposes. This was conducted in the real world, and the methodical considerations as well as the conclusions drawn are bound to be effective. This article fits in my paper due to the abundance of information it has, and influenced my own ideas about the paper considering the focus given on the stand of the government on this matter, which I am also interested in finding out. Haig, K. & Rod, P. (2013). Introduction to Psychology. London: Cengage Learning. The book is full of rhetorical aspects, and relates the actions of individuals in their daily life with transit activities. The book focuses on the impact of age on concentration, with relation to performing other tasks at the same time. The major aspect considered is the impact age has on motorists, with comparison of various levels of concentration of the elderly while handling the steering wheel, with that of the younger generation. This was the major investigation on this matter. Unit six of the same book specifically provides insight to the various research methods, theories developed and the methods used to analyze different life situations for the purpose of data accuracy and relevant analysis. The sample size used was of a town, which was almost effective and the conclusions made are bound to be efficient for use. This influenced my ideas on the topic, since I had not yet imagined that the aspect of age would have any relationship with road safety as well as concentration which is the most mandatory factor in this case. Flyyn, N. (2009). The E-Policy Handbook: Rules and Best Practices to Safely Manage Your Social Networking and other Electronic Communication Tools. New York: Amacom Div. American Management Association.

Paper For Above instruction

The issue of distracted driving, particularly the use of handheld phones while driving, has become an increasingly urgent public safety concern. As technology advances and mobile devices become more integrated into daily life, understanding the impact of such distractions and formulating effective policy measures are essential steps toward reducing road accidents and fatalities. This paper examines the causes and consequences of distracted driving with a focus on texting and handheld phone use. It seeks to inform policy proposals aimed at mitigating these risks, drawing from credible sources including academic books, safety reports, and government studies.

Distracted driving, especially due to mobile phone use, has been identified as a leading cause of road accidents globally. Stefan (2012), in his comprehensive book "Distracted Driving," details various causes of distraction, emphasizing the visual and cognitive impairments caused by cellphone use. The text highlights that drivers engaging in texting or talking on handheld devices divert their attention from the road, reducing their reaction times and increasing the likelihood of accidents. The author advocates for stricter regulations and public awareness campaigns to discourage the use of handheld devices while driving. The appropriateness of the sample size in Stefan’s study, which encompassed real-world observations, enhances the credibility of its conclusions, making a compelling case for policy intervention.

The significance of statistics in understanding the scope of distracted driving is underscored by the National Safety Council (2012), which collected data on accidents caused by drivers distracted by handheld devices. Although the sample size was large, the applicability of the data is limited by certain biases, such as the difficulty in precisely determining distraction levels post-accident. Nonetheless, the findings strongly suggest that alcohol impairment and cellphone distraction intersect as major risk factors, necessitating targeted policies. Recognizing that alcohol-related driving accounts for significant fatalities, policies should similarly prioritize reducing cellphone distractions, especially among young drivers and habitual offenders.

Further exploration by Kenneth and Ralph (2010) in "Succeeding with Technology" clarifies that while cell phone use differs from drunk driving in terms of controllability, both pose comparable dangers. Their analysis points out that government measures have been increasingly focused on banning handheld phone use through legislative actions across multiple states. The study's methodological robustness, based on data from seventeen states, underscores the effectiveness and feasibility of such policies. Effective enforcement and public compliance are crucial for these strategies to succeed, emphasizing the role of regulation and education in shaping driver behavior.

In addition to technological and legislative considerations, demographic factors such as age influence susceptibility to distractions. Haig and Rod (2013), in "Introduction to Psychology," discuss how concentration and multitasking ability vary across age groups, affecting driving performance. Their research indicates that elderly drivers may experience greater difficulty maintaining focus, highlighting the need for age-specific safety considerations in policy design. Such insights support targeted interventions, including education campaigns tailored for older drivers, to improve overall road safety.

Complementing these ideological and analytical perspectives, Flynn (2009) in "The E-Policy Handbook" emphasizes the importance of establishing clear rules and best practices for electronic communication. Implementing policies that restrict or monitor the use of electronic devices while driving—a cornerstone of modern driver safety regulation—requires comprehensive strategies that balance technological solutions with behavioral change. Establishing penalties, public awareness campaigns, and technological innovations like hands-free devices can collectively reduce distracted driving incidents. The effectiveness of such measures depends on consistent enforcement and stakeholder cooperation.

In conclusion, addressing the pressing issue of distracted driving due to handheld phone use requires a multidimensional policy approach. Combining legislative bans, technological innovations, demographic considerations, and public awareness campaigns offers a comprehensive strategy to decrease accident rates. Policy proposals should be grounded in empirical research, considering the behavioral and technological factors influencing driver distraction. Ultimately, safeguarding road users demands persistent efforts from policymakers, law enforcement agencies, technology developers, and the public.

References

• Flynn, N. (2009). The E-Policy Handbook: Rules and Best Practices to Safely Manage Your Social Networking and other Electronic Communication Tools. New York: Amacom Div. American Management Association.
• Haig, K., & Rod, P. (2013). Introduction to Psychology. London: Cengage Learning.
• Kenneth, B., & Ralph, S. (2010). Succeeding with Technology. London: Cengage Learning publishers.
• National Safety Council. (2012). Distracted Driving Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.nsc.org
• Stefan, K. (2012). Distracted Driving. New York: John Wiley and Sons.