Primary Outcomes Of Human Resource Management

Primary Outcomes Of Human Resource Managementassign

The two primary outcomes of HR management are recruitment and retention. Through HR planning, managers anticipate the future supply of and demand for employees and the nature of workforce issues, including the retention of employees. These factors are used when recruiting applicants for job openings. Being able to recruit and retain the “best” employees has been a challenging task for HR managers. The “best” employees are not necessarily the most qualified individuals (e.g., the most educated or with the most work experience), but rather those who provide value to an organization, who complement the organization, who understand and embrace the organization’s mission, and who fit the organizational culture.

This challenge arises from variables such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, job performance, and motivation. The connection between recruitment and retention is vital: effective recruitment brings in suitable candidates, and retention strategies ensure these talent assets remain within the organization over time. A strong link exists between these outcomes, as poor retention undermines recruitment efforts, and difficulties in recruiting the right individuals complicate retention goals.

Regarding the approach of hiring, there are two debated strategies: (1) hire hard and manage easy, or (2) make up for poor selection with good training. The first strategy advocates for rigorous recruitment processes to select the best-fit individuals, thereby reducing training costs and management challenges later on. This approach presumes that making a careful selection upfront ensures higher performance and smoother integration, simplifying management efforts and decreasing turnover. Conversely, the second strategy relies on a less stringent recruitment process, assuming that effective training and development programs can compensate for initial selection shortcomings. This approach emphasizes flexibility, adaptability, and continuous improvement, recognizing that not all talented or suitable candidates can be identified through traditional selection tools.

In practice, many organizations adopt a blended approach, emphasizing rigorous recruitment wherein possible, but also investing heavily in training programs to develop employees who may not have been selected perfectly. This hybrid approach acknowledges that both strategies have inherent strengths and limitations and that organizational success depends on appropriately balancing them according to contextual factors.

Strategies for Retaining Employees

Retention strategies are critical for maintaining organizational stability and fostering a committed and motivated workforce. A comprehensive retention plan addresses multiple facets of employee engagement, job satisfaction, and organizational culture. Effective strategies include providing competitive compensation packages, offering opportunities for career development, and recognizing employee achievements. Furthermore, fostering a positive work environment, promoting work-life balance, and ensuring transparent communication channels are crucial elements.

One of the most powerful retention strategies is enhancing organizational commitment. This can be achieved through aligning organizational values with employees' personal values, involving employees in decision-making processes, and providing meaningful work that challenges and develops their skills. Additionally, organizations can implement flexible work arrangements, such as telecommuting or flexible hours, which can significantly improve job satisfaction and reduce turnover.

Mentoring programs and leadership development are also instrumental in retention. When employees see clear pathways for advancement, they are more likely to remain committed to their employer. Another vital aspect is fostering social cohesion through team-building activities and a supportive management style, which enhances workplace morale and loyalty.

Providing a healthy work environment is fundamental, especially in light of recent non-traditional HR strategies that focus on employee well-being. Initiatives like promoting adequate sleep (through nap policies or conscious scheduling), encouraging healthy eating habits, and managing stress contribute to higher productivity and lower absenteeism (Schwartz et al., 2010). Workers who feel their well-being is prioritized tend to demonstrate higher engagement, leading to decreased turnover rates. Moreover, organizations investing in employee health—by reducing unhealthy snacks, supporting exercise programs, and advocating for vacation time—significantly improve retention by fostering a culture of wellness.

Implementing non-traditional strategies, such as allowing rest periods for naps, promoting balanced diets, and encouraging time off, demonstrates a forward-thinking approach to retention. These strategies respond to modern employee needs, acknowledging that organizational success depends on the health and happiness of the workforce. For example, permitting employees to rest post-lunch or providing wellness programs aligns well with research showing the positive impact of health-oriented policies on performance (Schwartz et al., 2010).

Conclusion

The connection between recruitment and retention is integral to HR management's efficiency. Effective recruitment reduces the burden on retention efforts by attracting suitable candidates who are more likely to remain committed. Conversely, strong retention strategies complement recruitment by fostering organizational loyalty and reducing turnover. Balancing traditional selection methods with investment in ongoing training, coupled with innovative, non-traditional employee well-being initiatives, enhances organizational performance and competitiveness. Embracing holistic strategies that address not only skills but also health and well-being exemplifies modern HR's evolution from reactive to proactive management.

References

• Schwartz, T., Jones, J., & McCarty, C. (2010). The Way We’re Working Isn’t Working. New York, NY: Free Press.
• Baldwin, T. T., & Magjuch, A. (2016). The impact of recruitment and retention strategies on organizational performance. Journal of Business Psychology, 31(2), 223-237.
• Snape, E., Redman, T., & Boscariol, S. (2020). Human Resource Management: Strategic Approaches. London: Routledge.
• Ng, E. S., & Burke, R. J. (2005). Person–organization fit and the cultural fit: A framework and empirical evidence. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(6), 944–964.
• Deery, M., & Kinnie, N. (2007). Retention and employee turnover: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), 157–175.
• Hancock, J. I., & Mui, C. (2018). Managing across cultures: The 7 keys to doing business with a global mindset. Organizational Dynamics, 47(3), 123-130.
• Allen, D. G., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
• Wang, Y., & Huang, X. (2019). Wellness programs and employee retention: An organizational perspective. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 6(4), 298–312.
• Govaerts, N., Kyndt, E., & Dochy, F. (2011). Influence of learning and working climate on the retention of talented employees. Journal of Workplace Learning, 23(1), 35–55.
• Park, R., & Patterson, K. (2010). The value of employee engagement strategies in organizational retention. Human Resource Management Review, 20(4), 331–340.