Prior To Beginning Work On This Discussion Forum Revi 172310 ✓ Solved

Prior To Beginning Work On This Discussion Forum Review The Following

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, review the following resources: Chapter 16 of your textbook Leadership: Theory and Practice Chapter 2 of your textbook Leadership Essentials: Practical and Proven Approaches in Leadership and Supervision Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing Links to an external site. webpage 12 Angry Men - Original Live TV Version 1954 Links to an external site. movie Featured: 12 Angry Men (Full Version) 1997 Links to an external site. video In your post, Apply different scenes from, the 12 Angry Men movie or short film to each of the stages of group development as formulated by Tuckman in Chapter 2 of Leadership Essentials: Practical and Proven Approaches in Leadership and Supervision . Describe at least one lesson that you learned about leading a group through hard times. Your discussion post should be 250 words.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The movie "12 Angry Men" vividly illustrates the dynamic process of group development through the lens of Tuckman's five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. By analyzing key scenes from the film, we can better understand how teams evolve and how leadership strategies can be applied during challenging moments to foster cohesion and success.

Forming Stage

In the initial scenes of "12 Angry Men," the jurors convene with uncertainty and a mix of initial impressions. This aligns with Tuckman's forming stage, where members are polite, cautious, and tentative as they familiarize themselves with one another and the task ahead. The scene where the jurors formally introduce themselves and briefly discuss the case exemplifies this stage, emphasizing initial interactions and the establishment of roles. As Oedekoven et al. (2014) note, during forming, "members learn about each other, and plan their work and their new roles around these new relationships" (p. 43).

Storming Stage

The tension escalates as conflicting opinions emerge, particularly evidenced when Juror 8 challenges the group's initial consensus. This scene reflects the storming phase, characterized by disagreements, resistance, and tests of leadership. Jurors express frustration and defend their positions passionately, revealing underlying conflicts and power struggles. As described by Oedekoven et al. (2014), "many tribulations, arguments, and disagreements" occur during storming, often testing the group's cohesion.

Norming Stage

Following heated exchanges, the jurors begin to build trust and understanding, moving into the norming phase. This is depicted when jurors start discussing evidence more collaboratively, listen to others' perspectives, and attempt to reconcile differences. The scene where they methodically analyze the evidence together showcases this growth, signifying a move toward cooperation and shared purpose (Oedekoven et al., 2014).

Performing Stage

As the jurors reach consensus, their focus shifts to collective decision-making, fulfilling the team’s purpose. The pivotal scenes where they finalize the verdict and support each other's perspectives demonstrate high-functioning teamwork. This aligns with Tuckman's performing stage, where the group operates efficiently, leveraging each member’s strengths to achieve their goal.

Adjourning Stage

The film concludes with the jurors dispersing after delivering the verdict, marking the adjourning stage. The characters leave the room, and their roles as a team conclude. This final stage signifies closure and reflection on the collective journey. Oedekoven et al. (2014) note that in adjourning, "the team disbands after achieving its goals," which is evident when the jurors depart the courtroom.

Lessons Learned

A significant lesson from observing this process is the importance of patience and open communication during difficult times. Leading a group through phases of conflict requires active listening, empathy, and fostering an environment where diverse opinions can be expressed safely. Sometimes, rushing through initial disagreements hampers team growth; instead, allowing the stages to unfold naturally can strengthen cohesion. I learned that embracing conflict as part of group development enables leaders to guide teams toward unity and sustainable success, both in professional settings and personal relationships.

Conclusion

"12 Angry Men" serves as an insightful case study of team development, illustrating how understanding each stage can assist leaders in navigating challenges. Recognizing the significance of patience, communication, and adaptability during hard times enables effective leadership, ultimately leading to cohesive, high-performing teams.

References

1. Oedekoven, O. O., Lavrenz, J., & Robbins, D. (2014). Leadership essentials: Practical and proven approaches in leadership and supervision. Peregrine Leadership Institute.
2. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.
3. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Pearson.
4. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
5. Schwartz, B. (2017). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Harper Perennial.
6. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.
7. Coghlan, D., & Brannick, M. (2014). Doing action research in your own organization. Sage Publications.
8. Goleman, D. (2013). The focused leader. Harvard Business Review, 91(12), 50–60.
9. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books.
10. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.