Prior To Beginning Work On This Discussion Please Rea 849768

Prior To Beginning Work On This Discussion Please Read the Required C

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, please read the required Churchill and Mruk (2014), Hayes (2012), and Waterman (2013) articles, and review the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct and Chapters 14 through 17 in your textbook. For this discussion, you will choose a person who has an important presence in popular media today. This person might be a political, business, human rights, education, or entertainment figure. Examine the major theoretical approaches studied in the class so far (psychodynamic, behavioral, learning, trait and type, and humanistic). Briefly describe your chosen figure’s personality from the point of view of each of these five approaches.

Evaluate and describe any cultural considerations which may affect the personality assessment within each of the given approaches. Analyze the ethical implications of basing your personality assessment on the information available through the popular media. Select the theoretical approach you think best describes the person and elaborate on his or her personality using this approach.

Paper For Above instruction

The task at hand requires an in-depth analysis of a popular media figure through multiple psychological theoretical lenses, considering cultural and ethical implications inherent in such assessments. For illustration, let us consider Elon Musk, an influential entrepreneur and media figure whose personality traits have been widely discussed and scrutinized in public domains.

Psychodynamic Approach

From a psychodynamic perspective, Elon Musk’s personality can be viewed through the lens of unconscious motives, childhood influences, and internal conflicts. Psychodynamically, Musk’s drive for innovation and boundary-pushing could be interpreted as a manifestation of underlying ambition rooted in childhood experiences and early relationships. His intense focus and sometimes controversial behavior might reflect internal conflicts between his desires for recognition and self-identity. Cultural influences, such as the value placed on innovation and individualism in Western societies, may shape perceptions of his personality traits. Ethically, assessing Musk’s personality based solely on media portrayals risks overgeneralization and neglects the depth of personal unconscious processes, emphasizing the importance of cautious interpretation aligned with psychological ethics (Churchill & Mruk, 2014).

Behavioral and Learning Approaches

Behaviorally, Musk’s actions and public behaviors could be seen as responses to reinforcement contingencies. His persistent pursuit of ambitious projects suggests a pattern of positive reinforcement from success and recognition, fueling further risk-taking. The observational learning aspect is evident in his emulation of pioneering entrepreneurs and scientists, which reinforces his innovative behaviors. Cultural factors, such as the societal admiration for technological progress, influence how his behaviors are perceived and reinforced in society. Ethically, behavioral assessment based on media images introduces the risk of superficiality, as behaviors in media may be curated or exaggerated. It raises questions about the validity and ethics of inferring personality solely from public conduct without comprehensive assessment (Waterman, 2013).

Trait and Type Approaches

The trait approach would focus on Musk’s specific personality characteristics, such as high openness to experience, intrinsic motivation, and a tendency for risk-taking. His extroversion is evident in his outspoken public presence, while his conscientiousness is reflected in his relentless work ethic. The type approach might classify him as a ‘visionary’ or an ‘innovator,’ categories associated with specific personality prototypes. Cultural considerations entail differences in how traits like independence and assertiveness are valued across societies, impacting personality judgments. Ethically, typical trait assessments rely on standardized measures, which are not feasible through media analysis alone; thus, inferences should be tentative and ethically cautious (Hayes, 2012).

Humanistic Approach

From a humanistic perspective, Musk’s behavior can be interpreted as driven by a quest for self-actualization and personal fulfillment. His pursuit of ambitious projects aligns with Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, fulfilling his desire for achievement and self-growth. Cultural influences, such as Western ideals of individual achievement and self-realization, support this interpretation. Ethically, evaluating personality through media depictions may risk overlooking the individual's subjective experience and authentic self. Nevertheless, a humanistic view emphasizes personal growth and self-expression, which can be appreciated without rigid categorization (Churchill & Mruk, 2014).

Comparison and Selection of Best Approach

Among the approaches examined, the humanistic framework may best capture Musk’s complex personality, emphasizing his drive for self-actualization, creativity, and personal fulfillment. This approach provides a holistic view that integrates personal motives, societal influences, and individual values. Applying this perspective, Musk exemplifies the pursuit of personal meaning in advancing technology and exploring new frontiers, consistent with humanistic theories.

Conclusion

Analyzing a media personality through various psychological frameworks offers insight into the multifaceted nature of personality. However, caution must be exercised regarding cultural and ethical considerations, especially given the limitations of media-reported information. The humanistic approach stands out as the most comprehensive and ethically sound for understanding Musk’s personality within the context of public perception and societal values.

References

  • Churchill, R., & Mruk, C. (2014). Ethical and professional issues in counseling. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Hayes, J. (2012). Theories of personality. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Waterman, A. (2013). Understanding personality: Theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
  • McLeod, S. (2017). Psychodynamic theory. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/psychodynamic.html
  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). The Neo personality inventory (NEO-PI-R). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieve motivation. Van Nostrand.

Related Assignments