Problem 23: Objectives 23.3 And 23.4 - The Following Are Mis

Problem 23 20 Objectives 23 3 23 4the Following Are Misstatements T

Identify and analyze various misstatements in a client’s year-end cash balance, including errors and omissions related to bank reconciliations and cash transactions, assuming these misstatements are intentional (fraud). For each identified misstatement, determine the most likely motivation behind the fraud, propose controls to prevent or detect such frauds, and suggest audit procedures to discover them.

Paper For Above instruction

The integrity of financial statements hinges on accurate reporting and effective internal controls. However, deliberate misstatements or frauds can distort financial data, leading to misguided decision-making by stakeholders. This paper examines specific misstatements related to year-end cash balances, exploring each scenario's potential motivation, preventive controls, and detection through audit procedures.

The first misstatement involves underfooted outstanding checks on the June 30 bank reconciliation by $2,000. This discrepancy may be motivated by a desire to inflate the cash balance artificially, enabling the individual responsible to overstate liquidity. To mitigate such fraud, controls like independent reconciliation reviews, segregation of duties in reconciling bank statements, and automation of reconciliation processes can significantly reduce opportunities for manipulation. During audits, procedures such as reconciling bank statements against ledger balances and verifying the accuracy of outstanding checks help in detecting discrepancies.

The second misstatement pertains to a loan from the bank credited directly to the client’s account on June 26, which was not recorded in the accounting records. Motivation for this fraud might include misappropriating funds or covering short-term liquidity issues. Implementing controls such as prompt recording of all bank credits and reviews by supervisory personnel can minimize this risk. An audit approach involves tracing bank deposits, verifying loan documentation, and ensuring bank credits are promptly recorded and reconciled.

The third scenario involves a check omitted from the outstanding check list, which cleared the bank on July 7. The motivation here could be to hide a cash shortage or misappropriation. Controls like regular review of outstanding check listings and comparison with bank statement cleared checks can prevent concealment. Auditors can perform cut-off tests around year-end, confirm the existence of omitted checks, and verify that all checks clearing post-year-end are properly recorded.

The fourth misstatement is similar—an omitted check from the outstanding check list that cleared on September 6—potentially motivated by the same intent to hide misappropriation or misstatement of cash. Control measures include thorough review of bank reconciliations and ensuring all checks are accurately recorded regardless of their clearing date. Auditors can examine subsequent bank statements and outstanding check reports to identify omitted items.

The fifth discrepancy involves cash receipts from July 1 to July 5, misclassified as June 29 and 30 receipts. This misstatement could be motivated by the desire to inflate June cash balances or to conceal embezzlement. Controls such as timely recording of receipts, daily reconciliation of deposits, and segregation of duties between cash collection and recording can prevent such misstatements. During audits, tracing receipts from cash register tapes or deposit slips to ledger entries confirms proper classification.

The sixth misstatement relates to a bank transfer recorded on July 1 but included as a deposit in transit on June 30. Motivations could include misrepresentation of cash position or manipulation of the cash balance to meet financial targets. Proper controls involve well-defined recording procedures for interbank transfers and reconciliation of bank statements against the cash ledger. Audit procedures include verifying transfer dates, reviewing supporting documentation, and ensuring appropriate classification of deposits and transfers.

The seventh scenario involves a check dated June 26, disbursed in June but not recorded in the cash disbursements journal, yet included as an outstanding check. The motivation could be to hide disbursements or manipulate cash balances. Controls such as timely recording of all disbursements, regular review of disbursement journals, and segregation of duties in check preparation and recording can prevent such fraud. Auditors can examine canceled checks, disbursement records, and compare them with ledger entries to detect unrecorded disbursements.

Addressing audit evidence regarding sales and collection cycles

In addition to cash and bank reconciliation concerns, auditors assess the accuracy of sales and receivables records through substantive testing. Tracing debit entries in the accounts receivable master file back to supporting sales invoices confirms that recorded receivables are supported by legitimate sales. This step aims to establish that all sales have been properly recorded and supported by documentation, thus preventing overstatement or fictitious sales.

Evaluating overstatements specifically involves tracing a sample of sales recorded in the sales journal back to shipping documents to verify that shipments occurred. This process helps identify any fictitious or inflated sales entries. Auditors often prepare aging schedules of accounts receivable to analyze the collectability and reasonableness of balances, which can also highlight anomalies or overstated receivables. Furthermore, selecting samples from initial sales orders and comparing them with recorded sales ensures completeness and proper authorization.

For internal control effectiveness, auditors commonly test transaction samples from files such as the sales order file, shipping document file, and sales invoice file. Focusing on these documents helps evaluate whether the revenue cycle’s controls are operating effectively in minimizing the risk of unrecorded or unposted sales. Specifically, sampling shipping documents supports assessing control over completeness and accuracy of sales recorded in the financial statements.

Overall, effective audit procedures, combined with robust internal controls and monitoring, are essential in safeguarding financial integrity. While the potential for fraud exists at multiple points in the cash and revenue cycles, systematic procedures and controls significantly diminish these risks. Continuous review, segregation of duties, independent reconciliations, and thorough testing serve as the cornerstone of fraud prevention and detection.

References

  • Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2017). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach. Pearson.
  • Carmichael, D. R. (2012). Audit Evidence: The Basics. Journal of Accountancy, 30(4), 48-55.
  • Whittington, O. R., & Pany, K. (2019). Principles of Auditing & Assurance. McGraw-Hill.
  • Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., Albrecht, C. O., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2019). Fraud Examination. Cengage Learning.
  • Lotz, S., & Whitecotton, S. (2017). Auditing: A Practical Approach. Routledge.
  • Hammersley, J. S., & Helfert, M. R. (2016). Internal Controls Over Cash and Cash Equivalents. The CPA Journal, 26(3), 45-50.
  • Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2019). Auditing & Assurance Services. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2020). Auditing Standard No. 5: An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
  • AICPA. (2019). Clarified Statements on Auditing Standards (SAS). American Institute of CPAs.
  • Machado, F. (2018). Detecting Fraud in Financial Statements. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4), 787-800.

Related Assignments