Program Comprehensive Exam Complete: The Exam Which Will Tak
Program Comprehensive Examcomplete The Exam Which Will Takeapproxima
Complete the exam, which will take approximately two hours and will be graded based on your score. View frequently asked questions concerning the exam. Click here to access your Comprehensive Exam. Please be advised that to be provided access, you must first purchase this exam through Ashford’s EdMap Bookstore.
Paper For Above instruction
The comprehensive exam is a crucial component of academic evaluation that assesses a student's mastery over the course material. The exam, typically taking about two hours to complete, is designed to measure various competencies and understanding levels necessary for successful progression in the program. Before attempting the exam, students must complete the purchase process through Ashford’s EdMap Bookstore to gain access to the assessment platform. This requirement ensures that students are officially enrolled in the examination and facilitates proper record-keeping and grading procedures.
The grading scale for this comprehensive examination ranges from a minimum of 0% to a maximum of above 65%, with corresponding letter grades and point allocations. Scores below 50% generally result in failing grades, with specific point values assigned to different percentage brackets. For example, an exam score between 65% and 100% qualifies a student for an 'A', awarded 20 points. Scores in the 62%-64.99% range earn an 'A-' with 18 points, while scores between 59%-61.99% result in a 'B+' with 17.4 points. The scale continues downward, delineating passing and failing thresholds clearly, which emphasizes the importance of achieving a high score to demonstrate competency in the subject matter.
Understanding this grading structure allows students to gauge their performance expectations and target study efforts accordingly. It is imperative to prepare thoroughly and familiarize oneself with the exam format and content areas to maximize the potential for a high score. Additionally, reviewing frequently asked questions related to the exam can provide valuable insights into common concerns and procedural instructions, further aiding in preparation and reducing exam anxiety.
Furthermore, planning dedicated study time, utilizing available review resources, and engaging in practice exams can enhance familiarity with the examination process. Post-exam, students are encouraged to analyze their performance, identify areas needing improvement, and seek feedback if available. Success in this comprehensive exam not only reflects individual mastery but also contributes critically to academic progression and qualification for subsequent coursework or degree conferral.
References
- Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press.
- Brown, P. C., Roediger III, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning. Harvard University Press.
- Knight, P. T. (2002). Being criterion-based: Comparing assessment philosophies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(1), 91-105.
- Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
- Race, P. (2007). The Assessment for Learning Handbook. Routledge.
- Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
- Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Testing teacher-made tests. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (pp. 192-207). American Council on Education.
- Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to quality instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328.
- Wilson, M. (2013). Constructivist assessment: Some implications for practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 10(4), 1-13.
- Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.