Project Progress And Control: How Would A PM Monitor Project

Project Progress And Controlshow Would A Pm Monitor Project Progre

Project progress monitoring and control are critical components of effective project management. They enable project managers (PMs) to ensure that projects stay on track, within scope, schedule, and budget, and deliver the intended outcomes. The process involves systematic tracking, analyzing, and communicating project performance, coupled with appropriate adjustments when deviations occur. This paper discusses how a PM monitors project progress, the frequency of such activities, the concept of project controls, and the procedures for implementing corrective actions.

Monitoring Project Progress

A project manager employs various tools and techniques to monitor project progress. These include regular status meetings, progress reports, Earned Value Management (EVM), Gantt charts, and project dashboards that provide real-time data on tasks completed, upcoming activities, resource utilization, and deviations from the plan. The frequency of monitoring depends on the project's complexity, size, and criticality; typically, progress is reviewed weekly or bi-weekly in smaller projects and daily in high-stakes or fast-paced projects.

Regular monitoring allows the PM to detect issues early, assess performance against planned objectives, and identify potential risks. It also facilitates communication with stakeholders, ensuring everyone remains informed of project status, challenges, and achievements. The use of project management software tools streamlines data collection and analysis, providing a consolidated view of project health.

Analyzing and Communicating Progress

Once data is collected, it is analyzed to determine if project tasks are on schedule, within budget, and meeting quality standards. Variance analyses help quantify deviations and identify root causes when performance issues are detected. Communicating progress effectively involves sharing status reports, dashboards, or meetings with stakeholders, including team members, sponsors, and clients. Transparent communication fosters trust, enables collaborative problem-solving, and guides decision-making.

Project Controls: Definition, Who Defines, Approves, and Usage

Project controls are the policies, procedures, and techniques used to plan, measure, and manage project performance. They encompass the processes for establishing baselines, analyzing variances, and implementing corrective actions. Project controls are typically defined at the program or organizational level, often developed in accordance with established project management standards such as PMI's PMBOK or ISO guidelines. They are personalized based on project scope and complexity.

Approval of project controls lies with project sponsors and senior management, ensuring alignment with organizational objectives. The project manager applies these controls throughout the project lifecycle, especially during execution and closing phases, by regularly reviewing performance metrics against baselines and adjusting plans accordingly.

Effective project controls facilitate proactive management by detecting issues early, evaluating alternative solutions, and guiding appropriate interventions to keep the project aligned with its goals.

Corrective Actions: Definition and Implementation

Corrective actions are measures taken to rectify deviations from the project plan, ensuring that project objectives are achieved. The project manager recognizes the need for corrective actions through performance monitoring, especially when variances exceed predefined thresholds. Root causes are determined via problem analysis methods such as the "5 Whys" or Fishbone diagrams, which help identify underlying issues rather than just symptoms.

Measuring the effectiveness of corrective actions involves tracking subsequent performance indicators to verify whether deviations diminish or resolve. Feedback loops, such as follow-up assessments and status updates, are essential for this purpose. If corrective actions are delayed or not implemented, the project risks further scope creep, schedule delays, cost overruns, and compromised quality. In extreme cases, unresolved issues can threaten project success and organizational reputation.

Timely corrective actions require a combination of proactive monitoring, clear escalation procedures, and accountability. Leadership must support prompt decision-making and resource allocation to address issues effectively.

Conclusion

In summary, effective project management hinges on rigorous monitoring, analysis, and control. Regular tracking and communication of progress enable early identification of issues, which can be mitigated through appropriate project controls and corrective actions. Fostering a culture of transparency and accountability ensures projects remain aligned with organizational goals, ultimately leading to successful project delivery.

References

• PMI. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). 7th Edition. Project Management Institute.
• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
• Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management JumpStart. 3rd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
• Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2014). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.
• Hendrickson, C. (2008). Project Management for Engineering, Business and Technology. Prentice Hall.
• Bon, J. V., & Fisher, R. (2006). Performance-based Project Management. Project Management Journal, 37(1), 67–76.
• Larson, E., & Gray, C. (2018). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Dressler, H. (2016). Project Controls: The Road to Success. Proceedings of the PMI Global Conference.
• Klastorin, T. (2011). Project Management: Techniques, and Practice. CRC Press.