Provide A 3-4 Sentence Response To The Discussion Question.

Provide A 3 4 Sentence Response To The Discussion Question Answer That

The list of research and practice is 1) Systematic reviews followed by the following, 2) Randomized control trials (RCT’s), 3) Non-randomized controlled studies, 4) Controlled cohort studies, 5) Uncontrolled cohort studies, 6) Case studies and case series, qualitative and descriptive studies, EBP implementation, and QI projects, and 7) Expert opinion (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). There are many methods of research. One must start out with a review of the literature in their inquiry.

One of the reasons is to see what research has been done as to not duplicate unnecessary research. A review will also help to see where to begin a research study or project. If a project is desired, is there enough evidence with reliability, validity, applicability, and replicability? If the evidence is sufficient, and has been applied to quality improvement and/or EBP projects then it can be possibly considered as expert opinion. Whatever you find in the process at least you can then consider if the research has the necessary information available or whether you may want to find another topic for research.

Paper For Above instruction

The levels of evidence in research and practice play a crucial role in guiding clinical decision-making and ensuring effective patient care. These levels range from high-quality systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to observational studies, case reports, descriptive research, and expert opinions (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Recognizing these levels helps clinicians evaluate the strength, reliability, and applicability of evidence when implementing evidence-based practice (EBP). Conducting a thorough literature review before initiating a research project or clinical intervention allows practitioners to identify existing knowledge, prevent unnecessary duplication, and determine whether sufficient evidence supports their proposed approach. Ultimately, understanding the hierarchy of evidence ensures that healthcare decisions are grounded in the best available research, thereby promoting optimal patient outcomes and advancing the quality of care.

References

  • Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Tricco, A. C., et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine.
  • Guyatt, G., et al. (2011). GRADE guidelines: Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
  • LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice (9th ed.). Elsevier.
  • Sackett, D. L., et al. (1996). Evidence-Based Medicine: What It Is and What It Isn’t. BMJ.
  • Higgins, J. P. T., et al. (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Sharkey, S., et al. (2020). Evaluating the Quality of Evidence in Nursing Research: An Overview. Nursing Evidence-Based Practice.
  • Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The Integrative Review: Updated Methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing.
  • Davies, B., et al. (2014). Evidence-Based Practice: An Implementation Guide for the Healthcare Professional. Sage Publications.

Related Assignments