Provide A Real-Life Human Example Of Classical Conditioning

Provide A Real Lifehumanexample Of Classical Conditioning Fromyour Own

Provide a real life human example of classical conditioning from your own life (either you or someone in your life). Label the unconditioned stimulus (UCS), unconditioned response (UCR), conditioned stimulus (CS) and conditioned response (CR). * The UCS and UCR are the naturally occurring part that does not require learning for the association to take place. We don't have to teach a dog to salivate when food is placed in his mouth, he just does it naturally based on his biological reflexes.

Paper For Above instruction

Classical conditioning, also known as Pavlovian conditioning, is a learning process that occurs through associations between an environmental stimulus and a naturally occurring stimulus. This type of learning was first described by Ivan Pavlov through his experiments with dogs, but it also manifests in human behavior in various everyday life scenarios. An illustrative example from my own life involves the experience of feeling anxious whenever I visit a particular dentist’s office, which was not originally anxiety-inducing but became so through associative learning.

The unconditioned stimulus (UCS) in this case was the dental procedure, specifically the needle injection used during the local anesthesia. This was a naturally aversive stimulus that elicited an unconditioned response (UCR), which was immediate discomfort and anxiety during the injection. The sensation of pain and fear associated with the needle, as well as the anticipation of discomfort, are innate responses to a potentially painful stimulus, and they do not require prior learning.

Initially, the dentist’s office was a neutral stimulus that did not provoke any particular response; I would go there without feeling anxious. However, over repeated visits, the sound of the dental drill, the sight of the dental chair, and the smell of the dental office became closely associated with the pain and discomfort of the needle. These stimuli gradually turned into conditioned stimuli (CS). The conditioned response (CR) was the anxiety and nervousness I experienced whenever I entered or even thought about the dentist’s office, even before the procedure started.

This process exemplifies classical conditioning as the neutral stimuli (e.g., the office environment, the sound of the drill) became conditioned stimuli after being paired with the unconditioned stimulus (the needle) that naturally caused anxiety (the UCR). Over time, these stimuli alone elicited the conditioned response, which was anxiety, similar to the UCR, but now triggered by the conditioned stimuli alone. This conditioned anxiety persisted even when I was not undergoing the procedure, demonstrating how associations form between environmental cues and physiological or emotional responses.

The significance of this example lies in understanding how fears or anxieties can develop through classical conditioning, which informs therapeutic approaches such as exposure therapy. In such treatments, the goal is to gradually unpair the conditioned stimuli from the anxiety response, helping individuals recover a sense of control and reduce their fear response. This everyday example vividly illustrates the principles of classical conditioning, highlighting its relevance in human emotional and behavioral patterns.

In summary, my experience at the dentist’s office demonstrates classical conditioning: the dental procedure served as the UCS, causing an UCR of anxiety. The environmental cues (office, sound, smell) became CS after being paired repeatedly with the UCS, eventually eliciting a conditioned response of anxiety even in the absence of the needle or actual dental procedures. This example underscores how classical conditioning can shape human emotional responses through associative learning in real-life contexts.

References

• Domjan, M. (2018). The Principles of Learning and Behavior (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Kalat, J. W. (2019). Biological Psychology (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. Oxford University Press.
• Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think it is. The American Psychologist, 43(3), 151–159.
• Bouton, M. E. (2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: Sources of relapse after behavioural extinction. Biological Psychiatry, 52(10), 976–986.
• LeDoux, J. (2012). Rethinking the Emotional Brain. Neuron, 73(4), 653–676.
• Barlow, D. H., & Durand, V. M. (2015). Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach. Cengage Learning.
• Mineka, S., & Ohman, A. (2002). Phobias and Primal Fear: Further Elaboration and Comparison with Other Anxiety Disorders. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of Self and Identity (pp. 77–96). Guilford Press.
• Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition. Stanford University Press.
• Crain, W. C. (2011). Theories of Development: Concepts and Applications (6th ed.). Pearson.