PSY 616 Milestone Two Guidelines And Rubric: Problem Overvie

PSY 616 Milestone Two Guidelines And Rubric: Problem Overview

You will prepare three graded formative tasks (milestones) supporting the analysis needed for the final product, a consulting case study and action plan for a real-world organization. The three presentations will examine the problem in the organization (Milestone Two), the strategy to address the problem (Milestone Three), and a prediction of possible outcomes (Milestone Four). These will also be included in the final project as an appendix. These formative tasks will scaffold to the final product providing opportunities to apply organizational consulting concepts and tools in a real-world example.

Guidelines for presentations: The development of concise, professional presentations suitable for presenting to the leadership of a client organization is an important component of an organizational consultant’s role.

For each presentation, the content should clearly address the specific goal. The target audience is the client, so the slides should be written in an effort to persuade the client to agree with your point of view. No matter how extensive the research or accurate the conclusions, a weak presentation can undermine an argument. When creating presentations, you will develop skills in researching an issue, synthesizing the information, organizing data logically, and presenting findings in an effective manner.

You may use a product such as PowerPoint, Google Presentation, or Prezi to create your presentations. There are various template designs available online—consider your presentation from the perspective of your audience prior to selecting a specific style. Avoid distractions and be consistent with the style of text, bullets, and subpoints to support a powerful presentation that allows your content to be the focus.

Each slide should include your key point(s). Do not place large blocks of text on the visual. Use clip art, AutoShapes, pictures, charts, tables, and diagrams to enhance but not overwhelm your content.

Be mindful of the intended audience. Useful tips and examples for developing your presentations can be found in resources such as "Making PowerPoint Slides," "Beyond Bullet Points," and "Really Bad PowerPoint and How to Avoid it."

Prompt: In task 3-2, you will submit a presentation describing your diagnosis of at least one problem within the selected organization. The format should be a three- to four-slide presentation. You will also post your presentation by the end of Module Three to Peer Commentary Discussion 4-2.

Rubric Format: The presentation must be between three and four slides. When applicable, discipline-appropriate citations must be used.

Instructor feedback: Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center.

Evaluation Criteria:

• Analysis of Organization: Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses clear and specific examples to support the analysis (23-25). Adequately describes the selected organization and analyzes the key organizational issues (20-22). Does not sufficiently describe the selected organization and analyze the key organizational issues (18-19). Does not describe the selected organization.
• Measurements to Address Problems: Meets “Proficient” criteria and identifies organizational consulting measurements that are best practices to assess the organizational problems (23-25). Identifies appropriate organizational consulting measurements to assess the organizational problems (20-22). Does not sufficiently identify appropriate organizational consulting measurements (18-19). Does not identify organizational consulting measurements.
• Diagnosis: Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides an insightful interpretation of each consulting measurement (23-25). Interprets the potential results of each consulting measurement with specific examples of data and information (20-22). Does not sufficiently interpret the potential results with specific examples (18-19). Does not interpret the potential results of each measurement.
• Visual Appeal: Meets “Proficient” criteria, demonstrating a professional style (18-20). Slides have a consistent visual theme that supports understanding (16-17). Slides have adequate style supporting some understanding (14-15). Lack visual appeal or clarity that negatively affects communication.
• Articulation of Response: Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization, and is professional and easy to read (5). No major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (4). Major errors that impact readability (3). Critical errors that prevent understanding of ideas.

Comments:

Students should aim to produce a clear, concise, and professional presentation that effectively diagnoses organizational issues and persuades the client of the validity of their analysis and proposed measurements.

Paper For Above instruction

In organizational consulting, presenting clear and compelling diagnoses of organizational problems is crucial for effective intervention planning. For Milestone Two, the focus is on analyzing at least one core problem within the client organization and presenting it in a concise, professional, and persuasive manner across three to four slides. This task lays the foundation for subsequent strategies and outcomes projections by providing a detailed understanding of the organizational issue and how it can be measured effectively.

Understanding the organization is the first step. A comprehensive description of the client organization must include its core functions, size, sector, and recent challenges, setting the stage for problem identification. Analyzing key organizational issues involves identifying the root causes of the problems, which may include leadership gaps, communication breakdowns, structural inefficiencies, or cultural misalignments. Utilizing specific examples ensures a thorough and nuanced understanding aligned with real-world complexities.

Measurement is central to diagnostic accuracy. The presentation should identify best-practice organizational consulting measurements, such as employee engagement surveys, 360-degree feedback, performance metrics, or organizational climate assessments, depending on the particular problem. These measurements enable the quantification of issues, provide data-driven insights, and facilitate targeted interventions.

Interpreting the data involves providing insightful analyses of potential measurement results. For example, low employee engagement scores may correlate with high turnover rates or decreased productivity. Specific examples of data—such as survey results or performance statistics—help illustrate how the findings reflect underlying issues and inform intervention strategies.

Visual presentation plays a pivotal role in effective communication. Slides should be visually cohesive, using consistent themes and engaging graphics like charts or diagrams that enhance understanding without overwhelming the audience. Each slide must focus on key points, ensuring clarity and professionalism. Avoiding clutter and large blocks of text allows the client to grasp the core issues at a glance.

In developing this presentation, attention to articulation—grammar, spelling, citation, and organization—is vital. Properly citing sources and using precise language reinforce credibility. The overall goal is to persuade the client of the seriousness of the problem and the appropriateness of selected measurement tools, laying the groundwork for subsequent strategic development.

In conclusion, Milestone Two provides an essential snapshot of organizational diagnosis that supports informed decision-making. A well-constructed presentation combines clear analysis, appropriate measurement, insightful interpretation, and professional visual appeal, ensuring that the client fully understands the organizational challenges and is convinced of the proposed diagnostic approach.

References

• Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
• Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 485-516.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
• Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36(1), 19-39.
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 340-370.
• Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Zohar, D., & Hofmann, D. A. (2012). Organizational culture and climate. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (pp. 643-673). Oxford University Press.