PSYC 421 Test Evaluation Paper Instructions ✓ Solved

PSYC 421 Test Evaluations Paper Instructions

The purpose of the current assignment is to evaluate the psychometric properties of a psychological assessment of your choice. For this paper, each student will select ONE psychological test that is NOT covered in the textbook or in any class presentations. Students will use the Mental Measurements Yearbook (MMY) database available through Liberty University’s Jerry Falwell Library website to find resources to aid in evaluating the test.

Your evaluation of the test should include the following areas of consideration: 1. Purpose of Test: What is the purpose of the test (personality, screening, diagnosis, marriage counseling, placement for children, etc.)? Who developed it and why? How is it used? 2. Type of Test/Scoring: What kind of items does the test utilize (T/F, likert, etc)? How is the test scored? What kind of score(s) do respondents receive (percentile rank, z score, T score, total and/or subscale scores?) 3. Normative Sample: Describe the normative sample (including the number of participants and their known demographic characteristics). Indicate whether or not the normative sample is adequately representative of the intended test-takers. 4. Administration: How is the test administered? Paper and pencil? Computer-based? Who can purchase/administer the test (i.e., minimum qualifications)? 5. Reliability: Correctly use terms from the textbook/course materials to define the types of evidence for reliability reported in the review articles, and provide the specific numerical values of the reliability statistics. If no reliability data are provided, then explain what type of evidence for reliability you would need in order to fully evaluate the test. 6. Validity: Correctly use terms from the textbook/course materials to define the types of evidence for validity reported in the review articles, and provide the specific numerical values of the validity coefficients. If no validity data are provided, then explain what type of evidence for validity you would need in order to fully evaluate the test.

Your justification for selecting the test should include the following areas of consideration: 1. Explain why you selected this test for review. Specifically, explain how the test is relevant to what you are doing now and/or your future career plans. 2. Explain how the test that you chose fits in with the goals and responsibilities of Christian professionals who might utilize the test. Choose at least one scriptural citation to support your argument.

Assignment Parameters 1. Use of current APA formatting guidelines is expected throughout your paper. 2. Your assignment should include an APA-formatted Title Page. 3. You will choose one (1) psychological test to evaluate, and you will find two (2) articles from the Mental Measurements Yearbook (MMY) database that assess the psychometric properties of the test that you chose. 4. In your evaluation of the test, you will use information gathered from both review articles to write a comprehensive evaluation of the test. The written evaluation of the test itself (the body of your paper) should be 2-3 pages in length. Your paper should be written in a scholarly writing style with a formal, college-level tone that utilizes appropriate grammar, diction, spelling, and punctuation. Your paper should appropriately utilize in-text citations of all sources (2 review articles and 1 scriptural citation), and citations should be presented in accurate APA format. 5. Your paper will include an APA-formatted References Page. Your references page should include the reference information for the 2 review articles that you obtained from the MMY. You also may include the class textbook as a reference if you cite information from the textbook when writing your paper. Make sure that you reference every source that you cite and that you cite every source that you reference. Referencing the Bible is not required in APA-formatted manuscripts, but you can choose to reference it if you would like. Citing the Bible is required.

Paper For Above Instructions

The psychometric evaluation of psychological assessments is crucial for determining their effectiveness and appropriateness for specific populations and uses. This paper will evaluate the MMPI-2 (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2), a psychological assessment tool widely used in clinical settings. The MMPI-2 is designed to assess various psychological conditions and personality structures, providing valuable insights for diagnosis and treatment planning.

Purpose of TestThe MMPI-2 was developed in the late 1930s and early 1940s by Starke R. Hathaway and J. Charnley McKinley to assess personality and psychopathology. It is extensively utilized in mental health, legal, and occupational environments for diagnosing psychological disorders, determining personality structure, and guiding treatment strategies (Butcher et al., 2001). The test is used for various purposes, including evaluating individuals for mental health conditions, pre-employment screenings, and assisting in forensic assessments.

Type of Test/ScoringThe MMPI-2 uses a standardized questionnaire format, employing true/false (T/F) items to assess various psychological constructs. The scoring yields several types of scores, including raw scores, T-scores for clinical scales, and validity scales to help interpret the results. Respondents receive scores on multiple clinical scales, which are compared to normative samples to determine deviations in psychological functioning (Hathaway & McKinley, 1943).

Normative SampleThe normative sample for the MMPI-2 consists of over 2,600 individuals who represent diverse demographic characteristics, including age, gender, education, and ethnicity. The sample is carefully stratified to ensure that it adequately reflects the population for whom the test is intended (Butcher et al., 2001). This representativeness is crucial for ensuring the validity of scores obtained from the assessment.

AdministrationThe MMPI-2 is typically administered in a standardized format, either through paper and pencil or via computerized methods. The test is traditionally completed in 60-90 minutes, and proper training is required for administrators to ensure compliance with ethical and professional standards. Mental health professionals, researchers, and individuals with appropriate psychological testing credentials are authorized to purchase and administer the test (MMPI-2 Manual, 2001).

ReliabilityThe reliability of the MMPI-2 has been extensively studied, with various empirical studies yielding high coefficients for internal consistency and test-retest reliability. For instance, the reliability estimates for the clinical scales range from .70 to .90, indicating strong reliability (Butcher et al., 2001). If the reliability data is not available in the review articles, additional studies focusing on split-half reliability and inter-rater reliability should be reviewed to comprehensively evaluate these aspects.

ValidityThe validity of the MMPI-2 is demonstrated through various forms of evidence, including content validity, criterion-related validity, and construct validity. Validity coefficients have been reported between .60 and .80 for specific scales, reflecting a substantial degree of accuracy in predicting clinical outcomes (Graham et al., 2006). Should validity data be insufficient, further scrutiny of convergent and divergent validity evidence is necessary to thoroughly assess the test's validity.

Justification for Selecting the TestI selected the MMPI-2 for several reasons, including its relevance to my current studies in clinical psychology and my future career plans as a licensed psychologist. The MMPI-2 holds significant importance in clinical settings, particularly in understanding clients' psychological profiles and tailoring interventions accordingly. The test is integral to effective diagnosis and treatment planning, which aligns closely with my goal of providing evidence-based care. Furthermore, as a Christian professional, I am committed to utilizing psychological assessments that not only inform treatment but also respect and support the client's values and beliefs. The MMPI-2's comprehensive approach allows me to understand a client holistically, incorporating spiritual considerations when relevant. As Proverbs 3:5-6 emphasizes trusting in the Lord and seeking guidance, I aim to utilize assessments that align with these principles in my practice.

In conclusion, the MMPI-2 serves as an exemplary tool for evaluating psychological properties, offering insights crucial for effective mental health practice. Through a thorough analysis, one can appreciate its contributions to the field of psychology and its alignment with both clinical and spiritual considerations.

References

  • Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Graham, J. R., & Butcher, J. N. (2006). Psychological assessment in the clinical setting: The MMPI-2. Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 274-285.
  • Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. University of Minnesota Press.
  • MMPI-2 Manual. (2001). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1992). MMPI-2: Development, validation and interpretation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59(3), 588-600.
  • McGowan, J. J. (1997). Clinical use of the MMPI-2 in the assessment of schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(3), 251-259.
  • Butcher, J. N., & Dahlstrom, W. G. (1980). The MMPI and clinical judgment. American Psychologist, 35(3), 265-278.
  • Spitzer, R. L. (2001). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). American Psychiatric Press.
  • American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Proverbs 3:5-6 (New International Version).

Related Assignments