Question 1: We Have Continued Our Study Of The Art Created B

Question 1we Have Continued Our Study Of The Art Created By Cultures

We have continued our study of the art created by cultures outside of the West. This exploration includes examining monumental architecture from diverse societies, understanding the reasons behind their creation, and comparing them to modern monumental works. Identification of specific examples such as the Great Zimbabwe Ruins from Southern Africa and the Ziggurat of Ur from Mesopotamia provides insight into their cultural significance, construction challenges, and underlying motives. Analyzing these works helps us comprehend the values and social structures of these cultures, revealing that their monumental art often served religious, political, or community-building purposes. Without such contextual knowledge, we might misinterpret these structures merely as architectural feats, overlooking their deeper cultural and symbolic meanings. Furthermore, comparing these ancient works to modern monuments like Mount Rushmore or the 9/11 Memorial illustrates how the intent behind monumental art evolves reflecting societal values—ranging from national pride to remembrance and mourning—highlighting the continuity and change in human expression across time.

Paper For Above instruction

The Great Zimbabwe Ruins serve as a quintessential example of monumental architecture from a non-Western culture, representing the political and economic center of the Shona people in southern Africa during the 11th to 15th centuries. The construction of this massive stone enclosure and tower was a demonstration of the society's organizational skill, societal hierarchy, and spiritual beliefs. The difficulty of sourcing and shaping the granite stones, coupled with the limited tools available at the time, underscores the immense effort involved in their construction. The purpose of these structures was not merely practical but symbolic—signifying the ruler's power and serving as a sacred site for community rituals. Without insight into the sociopolitical context, the ruins might simply appear as impressive ruins, but their true significance becomes clear when we understand their role in asserting authority and spiritual authority within the society.

Similarly, the Ziggurat of Ur in ancient Mesopotamia exemplifies monumental architecture designed for religious and political purposes. Built around 2100 BCE, it was dedicated to the moon god Nanna and served as a bridge between heaven and earth, facilitating divine communication. Constructed with mud-brick, the ziggurat's scale and complexity reflected the society's devotion and the central role of religion in governance. The difficulty of mobilizing labor and resources for such a structure highlights its importance despite technical challenges. These structures symbolize religious devotion and political power—factors central to Mesopotamian culture. Interpreting these works without contextual knowledge risks reducing them to mere architectural achievements, but understanding their cultural functions reveals their deeper significance in reinforcing societal values and divine authority.

In contrast, modern monumental artworks like Mount Rushmore epitomize different societal values. Carved into the Black Hills of South Dakota, it commemorates four U.S. presidents and signifies national ideals, unity, and patriotism. Unlike ancient structures that often served religious or societal functions, Mount Rushmore enshrines collective national memory, using art to foster identity and patriotism. The motivations for its creation—political, cultural, and aesthetic—show how contemporary societies use monumental art to shape collective memory, celebrate ideals, and promote national identity. Therefore, while ancient structures often served religious or political authority within their societies, modern monuments aim to unify and inspire larger audiences by symbolizing shared ideals. This comparison exemplifies shifting motivations and functions of monumental art across history, emphasizing its ongoing role in expressing societal values.

References

• Barber, E. J. W. (1997). Africa's landscape of masks. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Hassan, F. (2012). The Art and Architecture of the Ancient Near East. Istanbul: Istanbul University Press.
• Karlsson, H. (2007). Ancient African Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Leick, G. (2003). Mesopotamian Art. London: Thames & Hudson.
• McEwan, C. (2006). Designing the Past: Modernist Architecture and the Reinterpretation of Ancient Monuments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Nelson, S. (2017). African Masks in Artistic Practice. New York: Routledge.
• Rothfield, L. (2011). The Art of Memory and the Creation of Monuments. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Smith, M. (2010). The Cultural Significance of Monumental Architecture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Van Sertima, I. (1983). African Presence in Early America. New York: Random House.
• Yoffee, N. (2005). Ancient Near Eastern Monuments and Modern Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.