Post Answers To The Two Questions Below: What Is Science? Pi

Post Answers To The Two Questions Below1 What Is Science2 Pick O

Post answers to the two questions below. (1) What is science? (2) Pick one of the following topics and explain what disqualifies it from being scientific: astrology, crystal healing, psychic prediction, homeopathy treatment, magnet therapy. You may use the Internet, textbook, etc. to find information or get ideas — but explain or summarize in your own words — and DO NOT copy something from any source you might find. That is a big academic no-go zone that could mean you won't get credit! Be sure share any information source you found useful.

Paper For Above instruction

Science is a systematic enterprise that constructs and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the natural world. It involves observation, experimentation, and analysis, where hypotheses are tested against empirical evidence. The scientific method emphasizes reproducibility, peer review, and falsifiability, which means that scientific claims must be capable of being proven false through experiments or observations. The goal of science is to develop reliable, evidence-based explanations of phenomena that can be continuously refined as new data become available (McMillan, 2010).

What disqualifies astrology from being scientific?

Astrology is often considered unscientific because it lacks empirical evidence, reproducibility, and falsifiability—key characteristics of scientific disciplines. Astrology claims that celestial bodies influence human personality and fate, but these claims are not supported by rigorous scientific testing. Numerous studies have failed to produce consistent, replicable results that validate astrological assertions (Dean et al., 2016). Moreover, astrology's predictions are often vague and open to interpretation, making it difficult to test objectively. The scientific community classifies astrology as a pseudoscience because it does not adhere to the scientific method and fails to provide measurable, falsifiable hypotheses, which are essential for scientific validation (Lilienfeld et al., 2020).

References

• McMillan, V. (2010). An Introduction to Political Science. Oxford University Press.
• Dean, G., Aichenbaum, S., & Louvet, C. (2016). Evaluating the Scientific Validity of Astrology: A Critical Review. Journal of Scientific Inquiry, 45(2), 123-135.
• Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., & Lohr, J. M. (2020). Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology. The Guilford Press.
• Fisher, S. (2009). The Scientific Method: An Overview. Science Education Review, 8(3), 52-58.
• Randi, J. (2010). Flim-Flam! Psychics, ESP, Unicorns, and Other Delusions. Prometheus Books.