Question: Write An Essay Discussing The Use Of Encryption ✓ Solved

Question: Write an essay discussing the use of encryption to

Question: Write an essay discussing the use of encryption to protect data at rest, in motion, and in use. Provide a 1.5-page, five-paragraph APA-formatted paper.

Question: Explain the best way to protect a web authentication service. This component is valuable and should not rely on a single defense (beyond network restrictions or relying on the least-trusted component of the architecture, HTTP termination, which resides on the least-trusted network). Provide two different approaches in a 1.5-page APA-formatted paper.

Question: Discuss with your classmates the best defense strategies for the web authentication service. Generate many ideas and use the best ones for your individual assignment this week. Provide a 1.5-page APA-formatted paper.

Question: Identify a company that has changed its logos over time. Discuss the change and the reasons behind this change. How have these changes helped the company communicate to the customer? Provide a 1.5-page APA-formatted paper.

Paper For Above Instructions

Encryption for data at rest, in motion, and in use

Encryption remains a foundational control for protecting information as it exists, travels, and is processed within systems. Data at rest benefits from disk- and file-level encryption (e.g., AES-based mechanisms) with stringent key management practices that separate data access from key access, aligning with guidance from international standards and security engineering literature (Stallings, 2013; Anderson, 2020). Data in motion relies on transport-layer security (TLS) with modern configurations to resist passive and active interception, and organizations should follow standardized protocol selections and cipher suites outlined in established guidelines to reduce exposure to known weaknesses (National Institute of Standards and Technology [NIST], 2019). Data in use—while historically challenging to protect—has seen progress through trusted execution environments, memory encryption, and secure enclaves that shield processing from otherwise compromised hosts (Anderson, 2020). Together, these states require not only robust cryptographic algorithms (e.g., AES, TLS 1.3) but also disciplined key management, rotation policies, and auditable controls to prevent cryptographic misuse (Schneier, 1996; Stallings, 2013). Advances in cryptographic engineering emphasize the need for measured risk management, threat modeling, and adherence to formal standards (NIST, 2018; ISO/IEC, 2013). (Schneier, 1996; Stallings, 2013; NIST, 2019; NIST, 2018; ISO/IEC, 2013; Anderson, 2020).

Two different approaches to protecting a web authentication service

Approach 1: Zero Trust architecture with strong identity verification and mutual authentication

First, implement a Zero Trust approach that continuously verifies user and device identity before and during access, rather than assuming trust from network location. This strategy includes strong multi-factor authentication (MFA), phishing-resistant credentials such as WebAuthn/FIDO2, device posture checks, and mutual TLS (mTLS) for service-to-service authentication. Central to this approach is robust identity governance (NIST, 2020; NIST, 2017) and secure key management to ensure that credentials are bound to trusted devices and cannot be replayed. TLS 1.3 with secure cipher suites and proper certificate lifecycle management minimizes exposure to credential theft and man-in-the-middle threats (NIST, 2019). By combining mTLS, WebAuthn, short-lived tokens, and continuous risk assessment, organizations reduce reliance on any single defense in the stack and improve resilience against password-based attacks and session hijacking (OWASP, 2021). (NIST, 2020; NIST, 2017; NIST, 2019; OWASP, 2021).

Approach 2: Defense-in-depth with token-based authentication and hardware-backed security

Second, deploy a defense-in-depth model that layers identity protections across authentication, authorization, and session management. Use short-lived, rotating tokens (OIDC/OAuth 2.0 with PKCE) paired with server-side session management, and enforce device attestation and conditional access policies. Keys and credentials should reside in hardware-backed stores (e.g., HSMs or trusted platform modules) to prevent leakage from compromised hosts, with strict separation between application secrets and user credentials. Continuous monitoring, anomaly detection, rate limiting, and adaptive authentication based on risk signals complement these controls. This approach aligns with standards and best practices for secure identity systems and supports resilience even if one layer is breached (NIST, 2019; NIST, 2020; OWASP, 2021; ISO/IEC, 2013). (NIST, 2019; NIST, 2020; OWASP, 2021; ISO/IEC, 2013).

Collaborative defense strategies: ideas and best practices

Collaborative design discussions with classmates can surface a broad set of defense ideas. A practical set includes: 1) strong MFA with phishing-resistant factors, 2) WebAuthn-enabled credentials, 3) multi-layered network controls complemented by defense-in-depth identity protections, 4) hardware-backed key storage and secure cryptographic operations, 5) strict key management with lifecycle, rotation, and escrow procedures, 6) continuous authentication and session monitoring, 7) rigorous input validation and secure coding to reduce footholds for attackers, 8) secure API gateways and mutual authentication between microservices, 9) regular security testing, and 10) incident response playbooks with runbooks and tabletop exercises. These ideas, when weighed against risk models and regulatory requirements (ISO/IEC 27001; NIST guidelines), help form a robust set of practices for web authentication services (ISO/IEC, 2013; NIST, 2020; NIST, 2017; OWASP, 2021). (ISO/IEC, 2013; NIST, 2020; NIST, 2017; OWASP, 2021).

Logo changes: case study of a major tech company

A prominent example of a logo evolution is Google. The company shifted from a colorful, multi-font wordmark in the late 1990s to a more streamlined, flat design in 2015, and subsequently adopted a geometric “G” icon and a simplified wordmark aligned with Material Design principles. The redesign reflected a shift toward simplicity, versatility across devices, and clearer cross-platform branding, helping customers recognize Google across services with greater consistency. Official communications from Google and popular design coverage describe the motivation as modernization, improved readability, and strengthened brand coherence in a multi-device ecosystem (Google, 2015; The Verge, 2015; BBC, 2015). These changes contributed to faster recognition, better scalability in digital contexts, and a stronger signal of product modernization to users. (Google, 2015; The Verge, 2015; BBC, 2015).

Conclusion

Encryption across data states, robust web authentication defenses, collaborative risk-based design, and thoughtful brand evolution collectively support secure information ecosystems and effective customer communication. By drawing on established standards (NIST, ISO/IEC) and credible design histories (Schneier, 1996; Anderson, 2020; Google, 2015), organizations can implement practical, auditable controls that balance security, usability, and communication with customers. The integrated approach—combining encryption, identity protection, defense-in-depth, and clear branding—aligns with APA-formatted scholarship and current best practices in information security (NIST, 2019; NIST, 2018; OWASP, 2021; ISO/IEC, 2013). (Schneier, 1996; Stallings, 2013; NIST, 2019; NIST, 2018; NIST, 2017; NIST, 2020; ISO/IEC, 2013; OWASP, 2021; Google, 2015).

References

  • Schneier, B. (1996). Applied Cryptography. Wiley.
  • Stallings, W. (2013). Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Anderson, R. (2020). Security Engineering: A Guide to Building Dependable Distributed Systems (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2019). NIST Special Publication 800-52 Rev. 2: Guidelines for the TLS Protocol. https://doi.org/...
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2018). NIST Special Publication 800-38A: Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2017). NIST Special Publication 800-63-3: Digital Identity Guidelines. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2020). NIST Special Publication 800-207: Zero Trust Architecture. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2013). ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Information Security Management Systems. ISO.
  • OWASP Foundation. (2021). OWASP Top 10 – 2021. https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten
  • Google. (2015). Introducing the new Google logo. Google Blog. Retrieved from https://blog.google/products/logo/

Related Assignments