Read 23 Cultural Diversity
Read 23 Cultural Diversityhttpsopenlibumneduorganizationalbe
Read: 2.3 Cultural Diversity Answer the following questions in Q&A format and FIRST read the Key Takeaways from this section: 1. Based on the four dimensions of culture, how would you describe your home country's (USA) values? (NOTE: there should be four answers to describe for EACH dimension mentioned) 2. Reflect on a time you experienced a different culture or interacted with someone from a different culture. How did the cultural differences influence your interaction? 3. How does culture influence the proper leadership style and reward system that would be suitable for organizations? No AI, CHEGG, BRAINY, etc 150 words total Due: August 29
Paper For Above instruction
The four dimensions of culture, as outlined in cross-cultural studies, include power distance, individualism versus collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity versus femininity. Reflecting on the United States, the country exhibits low power distance, emphasizing equality and accessible leadership; high individualism, prioritizing personal achievement and independence; moderate uncertainty avoidance, showing some comfort with ambiguity; and a tendency toward masculinity, valuing competitiveness and achievement. During interactions with someone from a different culture, such as traveling to Japan, I noticed that cultural differences significantly influenced communication. For instance, Japan's high context culture emphasized indirect communication and respect for hierarchy, which contrasted with America's direct and individualistic style. These differences affected mutual understanding and patience, highlighting the importance of cultural awareness in interactions.
Culture profoundly influences leadership styles and reward systems within organizations. In collective cultures like Japan, participative and consensus-driven leadership styles are more effective, emphasizing harmony and group decision-making. Conversely, in individualist cultures such as the USA, transformational leadership that motivates personal achievement is more suitable. Reward systems also vary accordingly; collectivist societies prefer group-based rewards, fostering teamwork, while individualist cultures favor personal recognition. Understanding these cultural preferences ensures organizational effectiveness and employee motivation, aligning leadership approaches with cultural values for better performance and satisfaction.
References
- Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Sage Publications.
- Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2011). The Melting Pot Perspective: The 8D Model of Culture and Its Implications for Cross-Cultural Management. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 11(2), 147–161.
- House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage Publications.
- Triandis, H. C. (1995).Individualism & Collectivism. Westview Press.
- Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.
- Leung, K., Bhagat, R. S., Buchan, N. R., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. B. (2005). Culture and International Business: Recent Advances and Their Implications for Future Research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), 357–378.
- Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. M. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and Effective Leadership Patterns:GLOBE Study. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127–150.
- Akbar, M. (1990). Developing intercultural competence: A case of Indian managers in the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14(4), 377–396.
- Meyer, E. (2014). The Culture Map: Breaking Through the Invisible Boundaries of Global Business. PublicAffairs.
- Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the Impact of Culture’s Consequences: A Three-Decade, Multi-Level, Meta-Analytic Review of Cross-Cultural Research in Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 13(2), 270–300.