Read And Respond To The Following Question: 250 Words—What I

Read and respond to the following question 250 WORDS: What is Marsha's

Read and respond to the following question 250 WORDS: What is Marsha's conflict management style, and how has it influenced events in this case? What were Marsha's goals, and what conflict management style would have worked best in helping her achieve them?

Paper For Above instruction

Marsha Lloyd’s conflict management style predominantly aligns with the assertive and confrontational approach, reflecting her strong desire for fairness and recognition of her contributions. Throughout the case, her responses to perceived inequities in salary adjustments and her reactions to colleagues’ complaints demonstrate her tendency to voice her concerns openly. What largely influences her conflict approach is her commitment to performance-based rewards and her belief in meritocracy. She seeks to understand and rectify perceived injustices directly, rather than suppress or avoid conflict.

Her goals in the scenario were clear: to receive recognition and fair compensation reflecting her contributions, and to uphold her standards of merit-based reward within the department. She aspired to be acknowledged for her achievements and to address the perceived disparity in pay raises, which she believed undermined her sense of fairness and professional integrity.

The conflicts in this case have been amplified by her direct communication style, which, while honest, led to tension with Fred and the dean. Her approach has resulted in emotionally charged interactions, which might have been mitigated by a more collaborative conflict management style, such as integrative or problem-solving strategies. These styles emphasize open dialogue and mutual understanding, fostering cooperation rather than confrontation.

An effective conflict management style for Marsha would have been the collaborative style, which involves actively listening, seeking common ground, and working with her supervisors to find equitable solutions. This approach could have helped her communicate her concerns without risking alienation or misunderstanding, ultimately aligning her goals with departmental policies and fostering a constructive resolution.

References

• De Dreu, C. K., & Gelfand, M. J. (2008). The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 613-638.
• Rahim, M. A. (2017). Managing Conflict in Organizational Settings. Routledge.
• Kolb, D. M., & Williams, J. (2000). The shadow negotiation: How women can master the hidden agendas that determine bargaining success. Simon and Schuster.
• Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 1(1), 1-22.
• Putnam, L. L., & Poole, M. S. (1987). Conflict and negotiation. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 562-599). Sage.
• Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid: The key to leadership excellence. Gulf Publishing Company.
• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin.
• Schulz von Thun, F. (1981). Miteinander reden: Störungen und Klärungen. Rowohlt Taschenbuch.
• Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. K. (2005). Working Through Conflict: Strategies for Relationships, Groups, and Organizations. Pearson Education.
• Thomas, K. W. (1992). The user’s manual for conflict resolution. Utah State University.