Read Chapters 23 And 24 Along With The Information Provided
Read Chapters 23 And 24 Along With The Information Provided Regardingt
Read Chapters 23 and 24 along with the information provided regarding The Southern Manifesto. Once all reading is complete, respond to the following items: What is the basis of the opposition to the Brown decision as expressed in this document? According to the manifesto, whose power would the federal government usurp by implementing Brown? What role did “habits,” “customs,” and “traditions” play in the arguments presented in the document?
Paper For Above instruction
The opposition to the Brown v. Board of Education decision, as articulated in the Southern Manifesto of 1956, centered on the belief that the Supreme Court’s ruling disrupted the established social order and threatened the constitutional rights of states. This document, adopted by a group of Southern congressmen, asserts that the decision to desegregate public schools was an overreach by the judiciary and unconstitutionally infringed upon states' rights. The manifesto claimed that the court's ruling was an unwarranted interference in local affairs, justified by the mistaken premise of racial equality imposed by federal authority.
A primary basis for opposition, therefore, was the view that education and race relations should be managed according to local customs and traditions, rather than federal mandates. The manifestos highlighted the importance of “habits,” “customs,” and “traditions,” emphasizing that these elements constituted the foundation of social stability in the South. They argued that forced integration would betray centuries-old practices and cultural norms, which they believed were vital to community cohesion and moral order. These cultural elements were depicted as integral to the Southern way of life, and the manifesto posited that disruption of these traditions would incite social unrest.
The manifesto also expressed concern that implementing Brown would result in the federal government usurping the powers traditionally reserved to the states. By enforcing desegregation, the federal government would supersede local control over education policies, effectively diminishing states' sovereignty. The authors contended that education was a matter of local jurisdiction where communities could preserve their unique social fabric. They believed that federal intervention was an affront to states’ rights and an unwarranted intrusion into areas historically governed by local decision-making.
The argument linking traditions and social stability underscored the resistance to desegregation. The manifesto claimed that racial segregation, rooted in longstanding customs, was essential for maintaining order and harmony among diverse populations. The defenders of segregation insisted that the existing social hierarchy was based on “habit” and “tradition,” which they argued provided a natural and beneficial separation of races. They viewed the federal directive to desegregate as an unwelcome disruption to these ingrained social structures, risking chaos and violence.
In summary, the Southern Manifesto primarily opposed Brown by asserting that federal courts and federal authority were overstepping constitutional boundaries, threatening states’ rights, and undermining local traditions. The document styled the resistance to desegregation as a defense of the cultural and social fabric of the South, emphasizing the importance of “habits,” “customs,” and “traditions” in shaping society and maintaining order. These arguments reflect the deep cultural resistance to changing racial hierarchies and highlight the intersection of legal and cultural issues that characterized the Southern opposition to civil rights advancements during this era.
References
Finkelman, P. (2009). Encyclopedia of African American history, 1896 to the Present. Oxford University Press.
Goldstone, J. A. (2000). States' Rights and the Origins of the Civil War. Harvard University Press.
Klarman, M. J. (2004). From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. Oxford University Press.
Levine, H. (2002). The Desegregation of Public Schools in the South: A Study of Political Resistance. University of North Carolina Press.
Owen, B. (2000). The End of the Civil Rights Movement. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Powell, M. (2010). Racial Segregation and the Constitution. Cambridge University Press.
Shelby, T. (2005). We Who Are Dark: The Philosophical Foundations of Black Solidarity. Harvard University Press.
Vann, R. (1997). The South and the Civil Rights Movement. University of Georgia Press.
Williams, R. (2013). Disorderly Conduct: Vision and Protest in the Civil Rights Era. Harvard University Press.
Woodward, C. V. (2001). The Strange Career of Jim Crow. Oxford University Press.