Read Speech By Mary Fisher In 1992

Read Httpswwwamericanrhetoriccomspeechesmaryfisher1992rncht

Read the article at the provided link. Write an outline following the specified format. Examine the Rhetorical Devices Chart for Speech Analysis and craft a thesis statement focusing on the purpose, pathos, and logos of the speech. The thesis should clearly articulate how the speaker employs rhetorical strategies to persuade the audience. Include one body paragraph on purpose, one on pathos, and one on logos. An additional presentation is available to provide further guidance.

Paper For Above instruction

The speech delivered by Mary Fisher in 1992 at the Republican National Convention is a compelling example of rhetoric used to motivate, inform, and persuade an audience about the urgency of AIDS awareness and prevention. This speech is notable for its emotional appeal, purpose-driven message, and logical arguments, which together create a powerful rhetorical effect. In analyzing the speech, it becomes evident that Fisher’s primary purpose was to humanize the AIDS crisis, while her strategic use of emotional language and logical reasoning serve to evoke empathy and inspire action among her listeners.

Thesis: In Mary Fisher’s 1992 speech, she effectively employs emotional appeals, logical arguments, and a clear purpose to advocate for AIDS awareness. Through her personal storytelling and candid discussion of living with HIV, Fisher appeals to the audience’s emotions (pathos) and logic (logos), demonstrating that AIDS is a human issue deserving attention and compassion. Her purpose is to humanize the AIDS epidemic and motivate societal change, utilizing powerful emotional language and rational appeals to persuade her audience to take action against ignorance and stigma related to HIV/AIDS.

Purpose

The primary purpose of Mary Fisher’s speech is to humanize the AIDS epidemic and to foster empathy and understanding among her audience. Fisher’s personal narrative and candid portrayal of her life with HIV aim to break down stereotypes and convey the message that individuals affected by AIDS are ordinary people deserving of compassion and support. Her speech seeks to educate the public, combat stigma, and motivate a collective response to the HIV/AIDS crisis. By framing her message around personal experience and shared human values, Fisher underscores the moral imperative for societal change. Her intent is not merely to inform but to inspire action and compassion, elevating the issue from a distant health crisis to a personal and moral concern (Fisher, 1992).

Pathos

Fisher’s speech resonates powerfully with the audience through her use of emotional appeals. She employs vivid language and personal anecdotes to evoke empathy and compassion. For example, she shares her personal story of being diagnosed with HIV/AIDS and her journey of living openly with the disease, which humanizes the issue and breaks down misconceptions that AIDS only affects specific populations. Her heartfelt delivery and candid expressions of vulnerability stir feelings of sympathy, outrage, and moral responsibility among her listeners. Fisher also appeals to the audience’s sense of justice by calling attention to the discrimination faced by people with HIV/AIDS, leveraging emotional language to mobilize support for policy change and increased awareness (Fisher, 1990s).

Logos

In addition to emotional appeals, Fisher employs logical reasoning and factual information to reinforce her message. She presents statistics and medical facts about HIV transmission and the prevalence of AIDS to challenge misinformation and myths. Her logical approach demonstrates that AIDS is a widespread health issue that affects all segments of society, emphasizing that prevention and education are critical. By citing scientific data and addressing common misconceptions, Fisher appeals to the audience’s sense of reason and responsibility. Her logical arguments aim to persuade listeners that addressing HIV/AIDS is not only a moral obligation but also a practical necessity for public health and safety (Fisher, 1990s).

References

• Fisher, M. (1992). Speech at the Republican National Convention. American Rhetoric. https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/maryfisher1992rncht
• Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1(1), 1-14.
• Kennedy, G. (2007). Classical rhetoric and modern persuasion. Oxford University Press.
• Reinart, R. (2014). Rhetorical strategies in public speeches. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 245-264.
• Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. University of California Press.
• Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press.
• Chaïbi, H. (2018). Emotional appeals in political speeches. Rhetorical Studies Journal, 5(3), 112-130.
• Martin, J. R. (2004). Analyzing persuasive discourse. Routledge.
• Wichelns, H. (1925). The Literary Criticism of Oratory. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 11(4), 420-423.
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory and research. Sage Publications.