Read The Essay: Culture Clash At B Med Answer The Discussion

Read The Essayculture Clash At B Med Answer The Discussion Questiond

Read the essay "Culture Clash at B-MED," and answer the following discussion questions: 1. Compare and contrast the cultures of B-MED and MM Healthcare, using the seven characteristics of culture discussed in this chapter. 2. Explain why existing B-MED employees were willing to work for Samuels without any issues, yet the employees from MM Healthcare had issues. 3. Being that the two sets of employees came from different regions (i.e., Miami and Trinidad), explain the role of national culture in understanding the organizational culture issues in this case. What could have been done to ensure that both cultures (social and institutional) would mesh together? 4. What can be done to address the organizational culture clash in B-MED and restore profitability? Your response should be approximately two pages, formatted in MLA style. The paper is due in 12 hours.

Paper For Above instruction

The case study "Culture Clash at B-MED" highlights significant differences between the organizational cultures of B-MED and MM Healthcare, rooted in their contrasting regional origins, internal values, and operational practices. Analyzing these differences through the lens of the seven characteristics of culture—artifacts, values, norms, assumptions, organizational structure, communication styles, and leadership patterns—provides insight into the underlying causes of conflict and potential strategies for resolution.

First, artifacts, which include visible elements like dress code, office layout, and language, differ markedly between the two organizations. B-MED operated with a more formal, hierarchical environment, reflective of its organizational norms rooted in American corporate culture. In contrast, MM Healthcare, with employees from Trinidad and Miami, embraced a more relaxed, relationship-oriented environment. Values, which guide what is considered important within the organization, also diverged: B-MED prioritized efficiency and individual accountability, while MM Healthcare emphasized community and collective success. Norms of behavior, communication styles, and decision-making processes mirrored these differences, with B-MED favoring formal, top-down directives, and MM Healthcare adopting a more informal, participative approach.

Organizational structure further distinguished the two entities. B-MED employed a rigid hierarchy with clear roles and responsibilities, facilitating predictable workflows. Conversely, MM Healthcare was less hierarchical, promoting flexibility and personal relationships. This structural contrast often led to misunderstandings and friction when integration efforts occurred, especially in combined projects or collaborative settings. The leadership styles also reflected these cultural orientations; B-MED's leadership was authoritative and directive, aligning with American management principles, whereas MM Healthcare’s leadership leaned toward transformational and participative styles influenced by Caribbean cultural norms.

Communication styles were central to the culture clash. B-MED staff favored direct, explicit communication, aligning with Western business practices. In comparison, MM Healthcare employees often relied on indirect, context-dependent communication typical of Trinidadian social norms, which sometimes caused misinterpretation and frustration among B-MED staff. These differences contributed to a breakdown in collaboration, impacting organizational effectiveness and morale.

The willingness of B-MED employees to work for Samuels without issues can be attributed to their alignment with the company's organizational culture, shared values, and perceptions of stability. These employees perhaps identified strongly with the organizational norms and felt secure within the hierarchical environment. Conversely, MM Healthcare employees' issues stemmed from cultural dissonance, where differences in social norms, communication styles, and expectations led to misunderstandings and dissatisfaction. Employees from Trinidad, used to different social and professional norms, may have found the organizational expectations in B-MED unfamiliar or misaligned with their cultural context, resulting in resistance or discomfort.

Understanding the role of national culture is crucial in this scenario. National culture influences organizational culture by shaping employees' values, behaviors, and perceptions of authority and collaboration. The regional differences between Miami and Trinidad mean that social norms, communication styles, and attitudes toward authority are inherently different, influencing how employees interact within the organization. To ensure that both cultures mesh effectively, B-MED could have employed intercultural competence training, facilitated open dialogue about cultural differences, and engaged local employees in decision-making processes. Creating a shared organizational identity while respecting regional cultural nuances would have fostered greater cohesion and collaboration.

Addressing the cultural clash in B-MED requires strategic interventions. First, leadership must recognize and respect cultural differences, promoting an inclusive organizational culture that values diversity. Implementing cross-cultural training programs can improve mutual understanding and communication. Revising management practices to incorporate participative decision-making, especially involving local employees, can help bridge the gap. Additionally, establishing clear, shared organizational goals aligned with diverse cultural perspectives encourages unity. Regular team-building activities and conflict resolution mechanisms can also foster trust and collaboration. By fostering a culture of openness, respect, and adaptability, B-MED can restore its profitability and create a harmonious work environment that leverages the strengths of its diverse workforce.

References

• Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Sage Publications.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Thomas, D. C. (2008). Cultural Intelligence: Surviving and Thriving in the Global Village. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. (2000). Building Cross-Cultural Competence: How to Create Wealth from Conflicting Values. John Wiley & Sons.
• Hofstede Insights. (2023). Country Comparison: Trinidad and the United States. https://www.hofstede-insights.com
• Leung, K., Bhagat, R. S., Buchan, N. R., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. B. (2005). Cultures and International Business: Recent Advances and Their Implications for Future Research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(4), 357-378.
• Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2004). Cultural Intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 139-146.
• Morosini, P., Shane, S., & Singh, H. (1998). National Cultural Distance and the International Division of Labor. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 81-104.
• Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5-34.