Read The Linked Case Study: A Small Business Owner's Quandar

Read The Linked Case Studya Small Business Owners Quandaryin A 1 2

Read the linked case study: A Small Business Owner's Quandary : In a 1-2 page paper, describe Jay's leadership style, identifying at least one leadership method studied over the duration of the course. Then as a comparative, share what leadership style you believe would be most effective, considering the existing team. Senior Technician, Mike Thompson who often stood in the leadership role was a faithful employee, yet not at all satisfied with his position or income. Taking into consideration all of Mike's dealing, answer the following: Give an overview of the case study. Do you believe Jay was aware of Mike's dissatisfaction? Why/Why not? Do you think Jay should sell the company to Mike? Why/Why not? Assignment requirementsare as follows: The body of the paper should be 1-2 pages. The paper should include an APA formatted cover page and reference page. The paper should include at least 2 peer-reviewed sources, such journal articles from the Rasmussen Library. The paper should be proofread for correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Paper For Above instruction

The case study "A Small Business Owner's Quandary" presents a compelling exploration of leadership dynamics within a small business setting, focusing on Jay, the owner, and his senior technician, Mike Thompson. Analyzing Jay’s leadership style, it appears that he predominantly employs a transactional leadership approach, which emphasizes clear structure, task-oriented supervision, and reward-based performance management. This style aligns with the situational leadership method studied during the course, which adapts leadership behaviors depending on followers’ maturity levels. Jay’s approach seems aimed at maintaining operational consistency and short-term productivity. However, such a style may overlook the deeper motivational needs of employees like Mike, who seeks recognition and financial fulfillment beyond basic remuneration.

In comparison, a transformational leadership style could be more effective for the existing team structure. Transformational leaders inspire, motivate, and foster a sense of ownership among employees, encouraging innovation and personal development. Considering the situation where Mike often stepped into a leadership role but was dissatisfied with his position and income, adopting transformational leadership could help address these concerns. Such an approach would involve engaging Mike in a shared vision for the business, recognizing his contributions, and aligning his personal goals with the organization’s growth. This alignment could contribute to higher job satisfaction and retention, benefiting overall business performance.

Regarding the case overview, Jay owns and manages the business, while Mike, a senior technician, frequently shoulders leadership responsibilities. Mike has been a loyal employee but feels undervalued and undercompensated, which creates potential risks for morale and retention. Throughout the case, it seems Jay may not be fully aware of the depth of Mike’s dissatisfaction. His focus on operational routines might have caused him to overlook subtle signs of discontent or the increasing frustration expressed during casual interactions. Alternatively, Jay might have been aware but lacked effective communication channels or strategies to address these issues constructively.

Considering whether Jay should sell the company to Mike involves weighing leadership, succession planning, and employee motivation factors. Selling the company to Mike could ensure continuity and reward loyalty; however, there are significant considerations. Mike's leadership capabilities and business acumen might be limited, which could jeopardize the company's future if he lacks entrepreneurial experience. Furthermore, selling might not resolve underlying motivational issues or potential conflicts with other team members. A more strategic approach could involve Jay mentoring Mike, providing leadership development opportunities, and transitioning managerial responsibilities gradually. This way, Jay could retain the company’s stability while fostering employee growth and satisfaction.

In conclusion, Jay’s leadership style appears transactional, possibly limiting long-term motivated engagement. Transformational leadership could would potentially foster a more motivated and cohesive team dynamic. The decision to sell the company to Mike should be based on a comprehensive assessment of Mike’s readiness and potential, alongside strategic planning for leadership succession. Addressing employee dissatisfaction with open communication and leadership development could improve morale and business sustainability, ultimately benefitting all stakeholders involved.

References

• Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 33-56.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78–90.
• Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multi-factor leadership questionnaire manual. Mind Garden.
• Johnson, C. E. (2018). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership. Sage Publications.
• Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2013). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Pearson.
• Gardner, W. L., & Avolio, B. J. (1998). The charismatic leadership questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly, 9(3), 291–312.
• Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 746–771.
• Zhu, W., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2009). Where is the "self" in transformational leadership? Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 222–234.