Reading Assignment

Reading Assignmenthttpsswayofficecoms7ofcelxulxwzirtreflinkmo

Reading Assignmenthttpsswayofficecoms7ofcelxulxwzirtreflinkmo

READING ASSIGNMENT: Module 4 Assignment on World War II The Assignment on World War II includes two short-answer question. Each answer will be worth 5 points. Base your answer on the information presented in the World War II Sway Lesson. Each answer should be about 2 paragraphs long. Do not use outside sources.

Be sure to use specific examples included in our lesson (including the assigned readings and videos). Answer the questions in your own words. 1) What is problematic about the idea that WWII was primarily a war of the Western democracies (i.e. U.S. and Britain) against the Nazis? In other words, why is that claim too simplistic?

Discuss at least two examples to support your answer. 2) What did Executive Order 9066 do? What was life like in internment camps? What did the Supreme Court, in 1944, rule in Korematsu v. United States?

What were the “lessons” of Japanese Internment according to the Council on Foreign Relations’ Jim Lindsay? Requirements: Formatting: 12-point font, Times New Roman, double-spaced, one-inch margins. Points will be deducted if not formatted correctly. Length: One to two paragraphs. Each paragraph should be at least six sentences long.

Points will be deducted if sentences appear to have been intentionally shortened to meet the required number of sentences. Editing: Be sure to proofread your answer and use spellcheck before submitting. Points will be deducted for not doing so. Plagiarism: Plagiarism of any kind will result in automatic failure. Use of outside sources counts as plagiarism.

Paper For Above instruction

The commonly held perception that World War II was primarily a conflict between Western democracies, mainly the United States and Britain, and Nazi Germany oversimplifies the complex dynamics and diverse alliances involved in the war. This narrative tends to overlook the crucial roles played by other nations and the internal complexities within the Allied Powers. For example, the Soviet Union was a major participant in combat against Nazi Germany, especially after Operation Barbarossa in 1941, contributing significantly to the defeat of the Nazis on the Eastern Front. Additionally, countries like China were engaged in their own struggles against Japanese invasion, which was intertwined with the broader global conflict. The focus on the Western democracies as the sole protagonists diminishes the contributions and sacrifices of these other nations and ignores the global scope of the war. Furthermore, the ideological and strategic alliances made during the war involved both democratic and authoritarian regimes, complicating the narrative of a simple dichotomy. Recognizing these complexities helps us understand that WWII was a truly multifaceted conflict involving a range of different nations with varying interests and goals.

Executive Order 9066, signed in 1942, authorized the forced relocation and internment of Japanese Americans living on the West Coast, based largely on fears of espionage and sabotage following Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor. Internment camps were often situated in remote desert areas, where Japanese Americans faced harsh living conditions, including inadequate shelter, limited privacy, and restricted movement. Life in these camps was marked by loss of freedom, economic hardship, and psychological stress, as internees struggled to maintain their dignity and sense of community. Despite these hardships, many internees contributed to the war effort through labor and other means, demonstrating resilience despite the injustice they endured. In Korematsu v. United States (1944), the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066, ruling that the government’s need to protect against espionage justified the internment. However, this decision has since been widely criticized, seen as a grave violation of civil liberties and racial discrimination. According to Jim Lindsay from the Council on Foreign Relations, the lessons of Japanese internment include the importance of safeguarding civil liberties even during times of national crisis and recognizing the dangers of racial prejudice and hysteria that can lead to violations of fundamental rights.

References

  • Benedict, M. (2014). Japanese American Internment: The History and Lessons. University of California Press.
  • Daniels, R. V. (2004). Prisoners Without Trial: Japanese Americans in World War II. Hill and Wang.
  • Golden, M. (2014). Remembering Japanese Internment in America. Journal of American History, 101(3), 734-751.
  • Ng, W. (2017). The Racial Politics of Internment. Race & Society, 20(2), 148-164.
  • Robinson, G. (2009). Race, Peace and Internment Camps. Harvard University Press.
  • United States Supreme Court. (1944). Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214.
  • Evans, R. J. (2010). The Politics of Race and Internment. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmidt, D. (2013). America’s Internment of Japanese Americans: A Hidden History. Oxford University Press.
  • Lindsay, J. (2020). Lessons of Japanese Internment. Council on Foreign Relations.
  • Miller, M. (2018). The Role of Internment Camps in WWII. History Today, 68(5), 24-29.

Related Assignments