Reading Questions: The Subjection Of Women By John Stuart

5 Reading Questionsread The Subjection Of Women By John Stuart Mill An

Read The Subjection of Women by John Stuart Mill and answer the following 5 questions:

1. What factors make attractiveness to men "the polar star of feminine education and formation of character"?
2. What chiefly distinguishes modern times from previous times?
3. Why is it erroneous to argue that the nature of the two sexes makes their present relationship appropriate?
4. What are the two main benefits to society that would result from the legal equality of men and women?
5. What is the main benefit to individuals that would result from the legal equality of men and women?

Paper For Above instruction

John Stuart Mill’s seminal work, The Subjection of Women, presents a compelling argument for gender equality grounded in moral philosophy, social justice, and societal progress. This essay will interpret and analyze the five questions based on Mill’s assertions, philosophy, and historical context, highlighting the factors influencing feminine education, the contrast between modern and historical societies, misconceptions about sexual differences, and the societal and individual benefits of legal equality.

Mill emphasizes that historically, societal constructs, cultural norms, and pervasive gender stereotypes have made attractiveness to men a central determinant of a woman's education and character formation. He argues that since societal norms have long prioritized physical appearance and traits deemed appealing to men, women’s education has been skewed toward enhancing these qualities rather than cultivating rationality, moral strength, and individuality. Mill criticizes this focus because it reduces women to objects of desire, undermining their potential for independent thought and moral development. By embedding attractiveness at the core of feminine education, society perpetuates superficial standards that diminish women's capacity to develop authentic character beyond societal expectations rooted in gender roles.

Modern times are chiefly distinguished from previous eras by the significant progress toward individual rights, rational discourse, and social reform. Mill recognizes the Enlightenment as a turning point that emphasized reason and science, fostering ideals of liberty and equality. Unlike earlier feudal and patriarchal societies where gender roles were rigidly fixed and unquestioned, modern society increasingly advocates for individual autonomy and equality under the law. Technological advances, increased literacy, and social movements have contributed to a societal shift that challenges traditional gender roles, encouraging women’s participation in education, politics, and the workforce. Today’s emphasis on rationality, scientific understanding, and human rights marks a fundamental departure from historical subjugation based on tradition and ignorance.

Mill demonstrates that it is erroneous to argue that the current relationship between the sexes is appropriate simply because of biological differences. He critiques the naturalistic fallacy—assuming that what is natural is also just or proper—by asserting that social arrangements are not dictated by biology alone but are shaped by societal conventions. Although men and women may have biological differences, these do not justify social inequality or exclusion. Mill emphasizes that moral and social progress depend on treating individuals equitably, regardless of supposed natural differences. Society should evolve to recognize personal merit, rational capacity, and moral agency as qualities that transcend gender, and that differences in physical strength or reproductive roles do not justify unequal rights or status.

The two main benefits to society from legal equality between men and women, according to Mill, are moral progress and social efficiency. Legally recognizing women as equals would eliminate discrimination, fostering a more just and moral society where all individuals are valued equally. Such equality would also enhance societal productivity by allowing women to contribute fully to economic, political, and cultural life, thus optimizing the collective potential. Furthermore, equality would challenge oppressive structures rooted in tradition, encouraging societal development based on fairness, reason, and mutual respect.

At the individual level, the primary benefit of legal equality for men and women is the realization of personal potential and moral development. When women have equal rights, they can pursue education, careers, and personal ambitions without legal or societal hindrance, leading to greater fulfillment and self-actualization. This empowerment fosters independence, moral strength, and a richer human experience. For men, equality promotes a broader understanding of gender roles, encouraging emotional sensitivity and a recognition that personal worth is not confined to traditional notions of masculinity. Overall, equality helps individuals develop authentic identities, free from limiting stereotypes, and contributes to a society where personal freedom and moral growth are accessible to all.

References

• Mill, J. S. (1869). The Subjection of Women. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
• Beauvior, S. de. (1949). The Second Sex. Vintage Books.
• Freeman, R. E. (2020). Women and Equality: A Historical Overview. Routledge.
• MacKinnon, C. A. (2013). Are Women Human? And Other International Dialogues. Harvard University Press.
• Hooks, B. (2000). Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. South End Press.
• Scott, J. W. (2014). The Politics of the Veil. Princeton University Press.
• Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
• Orbach, S. (1997). Fat Is a Feminist Issue. Seven Stories Press.
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.