Real Business IT Can Be Difficult For A Business To I 627721

Real Businessit Can Be Difficult For A Business To Improve How It Oper

Businesses often face challenges in improving their internal operations, necessitating external perspectives to identify areas for growth. A leadership consultant plays a vital role in assessing organizational structures, human resources practices, and leadership styles to recommend effective strategies. In the context of a large discount retail company, the task involves analyzing the company’s organizational chart, human resources processes, and leadership approach to facilitate meaningful improvements that enhance the overall performance and culture.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding organizational structure is fundamental in diagnosing operational effectiveness within a company. When examining an organization chart, one assesses whether a company has a tall or flat structure. A tall organization is characterized by multiple hierarchical levels, creating a chain of command with narrow spans of control, whereas a flat structure has few levels, promoting broader spans and more direct communication channels. For instance, if the chart reveals multiple layers of management with distinct levels of authority, it indicates a tall structure, which can sometimes slow decision-making but provide clear supervision. Conversely, a flat structure fosters quicker communication and a more collaborative environment but might challenge clarity in authority and responsibilities. Based on my analysis, my company exhibits a flat organizational structure, which promotes agility and facilitates quick information flow, although it may sometimes result in role ambiguity and less defined supervision.

In assessing human resources practices, it is vital to review the HR cycle—comprising recruitment, onboarding, training and development, performance appraisal, and employee separation. Many organizations excel in certain phases, such as recruitment and onboarding, ensuring new hires are effectively integrated. However, they may neglect ongoing development or performance review, which are critical for maintaining high performance and employee satisfaction. For my organization, the missing component appears to be continuous training and development, particularly in leadership skills and technological adaptability. Including this step is crucial because it enhances employee skills, encourages engagement, and prepares the workforce for future challenges, ultimately fostering a resilient and innovative company culture.

Leadership style significantly influences team dynamics and organizational success. For the team leader in question, the described leadership approach aligns with the authoritarian style—characterized by high control, clear directives, and limited subordinate participation. This style has benefits, such as ensuring adherence to standards and quick decision-making during urgent situations. However, drawbacks include reduced employee autonomy, potential demotivation, and decreased creativity within the team. To optimize performance, the leader might consider adopting a transformational style—motivating employees through shared vision and encouragement, which can increase engagement and innovation while still maintaining effective oversight.

Applying these insights to my own company reveals similar dynamics. The organization exhibits a moderately tall structure, with several levels of management, which influences communication and decision-making. While this hierarchical setup provides clear authority lines, it can slow down responsiveness and creativity needed in fast-paced markets. The HR practices in my company generally excel in recruitment and onboarding but lack emphasis on continuous employee development, which diminishes long-term growth potential. These gaps affect team motivation and skill development, ultimately influencing productivity and morale.

Considering leadership styles, my supervisor primarily employs a transformational leadership approach—encouraging innovation and empowering team members. This style benefits the team by fostering a collaborative environment, enhancing motivation, and promoting professional growth. Nonetheless, a potential drawback could be insufficient oversight, leading to issues with accountability. To enhance leadership effectiveness, both myself and my supervisor could incorporate more structured feedback mechanisms and accountability measures, ensuring a balance between motivation and discipline.

In conclusion, a comprehensive analysis of organizational structure, HR practices, and leadership styles provides crucial insights into operational effectiveness. By understanding these elements, organizations can implement targeted improvements, such as flattening hierarchies, enhancing developmental initiatives, and adopting adaptive leadership approaches, which collectively foster a more agile, motivated, and high-performing workforce.

References

• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Dessler, G. (2020). Human Resource Management (16th ed.). Pearson.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
• Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2017). Management (13th ed.). Pearson.
• Smith, P. J. (2014). Organizational structure: From hierarchy to network. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1027-1044.
• Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Johnson, D., Sandholtz, K., & Younger, J. (2012). HR Competencies: Mastery at the Intersection of People and Business. Society for Human Resource Management.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Zhu, W., Judge, T. A., & Sarkar, M. (2016). Employee emotional intelligence and leader-member exchange. Personnel Psychology, 69(2), 489-526.