Real Life Problem Assignment Background Managers Often Find

Real Life Problem Assignment backgroundmanagers Often Find Themselves

Real Life Problem Assignment backgroundmanagers Often Find Themselves

Managers often find themselves in situations trying to solve a problem, and the tough part is identifying what the actual problem is. Recognizing the root issue requires a skillful approach, especially when multiple opinions and data points create confusion. For example, at ABC Engineering Company, there has been ongoing concern about high turnover among recent college recruits, especially engineering graduates. The problem escalated from department-level complaints to executive awareness, with accusations mainly pointing toward compensation as the primary cause. The leadership team, including HR and departmental managers, have different perceptions of what the core issue might be, ranging from salary concerns to management training deficiencies. As the Vice President of Human Resources (VPHR), your challenge is to analyze the situation objectively, identify the true problem, and recommend appropriate solutions based on a thorough understanding of the organizational dynamics and employee feedback.

Paper For Above instruction

In addressing the high turnover issue at ABC Engineering Company, a comprehensive analysis from a human resources perspective necessitates distinguishing between perceived and actual problems. The scenario illustrates the complexities involved in diagnosing organizational issues, especially when multiple stakeholders have differing opinions about the root cause. To effectively resolve this problem, one must first approach it systematically, assessing evidence beyond surface-level opinions and preconceived notions.

Assessment of the Turnover Problem

The first step is to evaluate whether there is indeed a significant turnover problem. Based on the information provided, the resignation of six recent campus recruits out of fifty, with four resigning within 60 days, indicates a potential issue. The engineering department's anger about compensation and the management's conviction that pay is insufficient suggest an authentic concern, although it could also be influenced by departmental culture and management style. The fact that resignations are concentrated among recent hires from campus recruitment amplifies the need to investigate whether onboarding, training, or cultural fit contribute to early attrition. Therefore, the answer to Question 1 is: Probably Yes. Evidence points towards a concerning trend, but further investigation is needed to confirm if it qualifies as a significant turnover problem.

Initial Perceptions and Stakeholder Opinions

When exploring whether a problem exists and what its nature might be, stakeholders often highlight different issues. In the scenario, students responded to the question with various options, including pay concerns, management training deficiencies, or uncertainty about the problem's nature. If you were to ask the class, their answers would likely reflect the dominant perceptions, which in this scenario align with option A (pay issues) and C (management or leadership issues), depending on their interpretation.

  • Pay is the problem
  • Management training is the problem
  • The SRVP (Senior Vice President) is the problem
  • Not sure what the problem is

This range of opinions underscores the importance of conducting a thorough diagnosis, rather than jumping to conclusions based on initial impressions or departmental assertions.

Actions Based on Stakeholder Perceptions

If Responding to A, B, or C in Question 2

If the predominant view is that pay is the issue (A), actions should include conducting a detailed salary competitiveness analysis compared to industry standards, internal equity assessments, and employee satisfaction surveys focusing on compensation. If management training (B) is perceived as the core problem, then implementing targeted onboarding and leadership development programs, along with management coaching, would be appropriate. If the SRVP (C) is deemed the root cause, addressing leadership style, communication practices, and cultural tone becomes essential, possibly including leadership development initiatives and cultural assessments.

If D (Not sure what the problem is), The questions I would ask include:

  • What are the main reasons employees cite for leaving in exit interviews?
  • Are there differences in turnover rates across departments or demographic groups?
  • What do recent hires say about their onboarding and initial experiences?
  • How satisfied are employees with their compensation, work environment, and management?
  • Are there any organizational or cultural issues emerging from employee feedback?
  • Has there been any recent change in organizational policies, leadership, or strategy that could impact morale?

Actions to Fix a Confirmed Turnover Problem

If the answer to Question 1 is 'Yes,' indicating a confirmed turnover issue, actions should include designing targeted interventions such as adjusting compensation packages, refining onboarding processes, improving management practices, or fostering a supportive organizational culture. Specifically, for this scenario, initiatives might include benchmarking salaries, providing leadership and management training, enhancing employee engagement programs, and improving communication channels between employees and management.

Steps to Determine if There Is a Problem

If the answer is 'No Idea,' a systematic approach involves data collection and analysis—reviewing exit interview summaries, conducting employee engagement surveys, benchmarking industry standards, and performing focus groups. Gathering qualitative and quantitative data will reveal whether turnover rates surpass acceptable thresholds and if underlying causes are problematic. Engaging both management and employees in these assessments ensures a comprehensive understanding of potential issues.

Approximate Turnover Percentage

Based on the scenario data, approximately 4 out of 10 months, 6 of 50 recent campus recruits resigned, which equates to 12%. However, considering resignations within a shorter timeframe (60 days), the turnover rate among recent hires (4 out of 50) is 8%. These are preliminary figures, but if extrapolated annually and across other categories, the turnover percentage could be higher, possibly ranging from 10% to 20%, depending on additional data from other employee groups and turnover trends.

Conclusion

Addressing turnover issues requires a nuanced understanding that goes beyond surface-level explanations such as pay or management. It involves analyzing organizational culture, onboarding processes, leadership practices, and employee engagement. As VPHR, adopting a data-driven, holistic approach ensures that interventions are targeted, effective, and sustainable. Recognizing the complex interplay of various factors influencing employee retention will allow management to make informed decisions that improve organizational stability and employee satisfaction.

References

  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.
  • Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Senter, A., & Erez, M. (2001). Why People Stay: Using Job Embeddedness to Predict Voluntary Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121.
  • Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1995). Employee Turnover. South-Western College Publishing.
  • Griffeth, R. W., & Hom, P. W. (2001). Retaining Employees: Turning Talent into a Competitive Advantage. Sage Publications.
  • Allen, D. (2008). Retaining Talent: A Guide to Analyze, Develop, and Implement Employee Retention Strategies. Society for Human Resource Management.
  • Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations Between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Design of Work Groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(3), 823-850.
  • Baumgartner, B. A., & Schneider, B. (2010). Organizational Culture and Turnover Intentions: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 157–170.
  • Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and Human Resource Management. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Maertz, C. P., & Campion, M. A. (2004). Profiles in Staying: Understanding Employee Turnover and Retention. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33(2), 110–125.
  • Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A. J., & Tamkins, M. M. (2002). Organizational Culture and Employee Retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1054–1062.