Realism Is One Way To Study International Relations

Realism Is One Way To Study International Relations By Considering Th

Realism is one way to study International Relations. By considering the propositions of realism on human nature, role of state, war, international institutions, security, interest, economy etc., please explain the cartoon. What does it say about the system of international affairs? Hint: Don’t overlook the details! Give attention to the position (territories and resources) of each party while analyzing the cartoon. Also, think about the interests of each party and also the ways and reasons that they communicate to each other. Guidelines: Your answer should be no less than 400 words. Double-spaced, separate paragraphs with topic sentences and supporting sentences You don't need outside resources, but be clear and give compelling reasons for your position Work together!

Paper For Above instruction

The cartoon under analysis offers a vivid depiction of the international system as viewed through the lens of realism, emphasizing inherent power struggles, competition for resources, and the pursuit of national interests. Realism, a foundational theory in international relations, posits that states are the primary and rational actors driven by interests, security concerns, and the desire to maximize power within an anarchic international system. This perspective serves as a useful framework to interpret the interactions, symbols, and territorial arrangements depicted in the cartoon.

At the core of realism lies the recognition that the international system lacks a central authority; hence, states must rely on their own capabilities to ensure security and preserve their sovereignty. In the cartoon, the positioning of each party—perhaps represented by nations or actors—reflects the competitive and often confrontational nature of international relations. For example, the map or territorial blocks may reveal a distribution of resources such as land, energy supplies, or strategic advantages, illustrating the pursuit of material interests that define state behavior. Realists argue that control over these resources is critical for a state's survival and influence. If the cartoon depicts one party encroaching upon another’s territory or resource zones, it underscores the realist idea that states continuously seek to expand their power and prevent others from dominant security.

The cartoon’s symbolism might include actors showing defensive or offensive postures, military hardware, or borders that suggest ongoing power struggles. From a realist perspective, such imagery underscores the enduring rivalry and mistrust among states, with conflict and war viewed as inevitable phenomena when interests clash. For instance, the depiction of a heavily armed party near a border could signify the significance of military strength and readiness in maintaining security, as well as the propensity for conflicts rooted in disputes over territories or resources. Such disputes are typically driven by rational calculations aimed at maximizing a state's relative power and security, often disregarding international institutions which, according to realism, lack real authority or efficacy in constraining state actions.

Communication among the parties in the cartoon might be depicted as tense, transactional, or coercive, illustrating the typical realist view that diplomacy is often merely a means to negotiate relative gains or to deceive opponents while preparing for possible conflict. States communicate their interests through threats, alliances, or displays of power, seeking to bolster their security and influence. The reasons for such interaction are rooted in the core realist belief that international cooperation is limited and that a state’s primary goal is self-preservation, often at the expense of others. The cartoon thus encapsulates the realist notion that international affairs are characterized by competition, mistrust, and power politics, where the pursuit of national interests often leads to instability and conflict.

In conclusion, the cartoon vividly portrays the realist view of the international system as a competitive arena of states vying for territories and resources, communicating distrustfully, and engaging in power struggles. It emphasizes that international relations are driven by rational actors seeking security and influence within an anarchic environment, often resulting in conflict and rivalry. This interpretation highlights the significance of military strength, strategic interests, and territorial control in shaping global affairs—notably aligning with the core propositions of realism about human nature, state behavior, and the structure of the international system.

References

• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.
• Rosenberg, J. (2015). The Follies of Power: America's Unnecessary War. Oxford University Press.
• Kennedy, P. (2006). The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, and Future of the United Nations. HarperCollins.
• Layne, C. (1993). The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise. International Security, 17(4), 5–51.
• Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Scott, Foresman and Company.
• Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2017). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press.
• Friedberg, A. L. (2000). The Future of American Power: Dominance and Decline in Perspective. International Security, 26(1), 5–50.
• Bullock, A. (2009). The Cold War: A New History. Oneworld Publications.
• Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Alfred A. Knopf.