Reference Page For Nasdaq Historical Data
Reference Page Httpwwwgooglecomfinancehistoricalqnasdaqgo
Reviewing the provided data and questions related to Google stock prices over the past year, the core inquiry involves analyzing the stock's closing prices within that period. The questions focus on probabilities concerning the stock closing below the annual mean, exceeding a specific value, or falling within a certain range around the mean. Additionally, the questions examine the statistical rarity of a specific stock price, as well as identifying quartile values and evaluating the validity of initial assumptions about the data distribution. The overarching goal is to interpret the historical stock data to answer probabilistic and statistical questions accurately, based on the historical closing prices of Google's stock for the specified period.
Paper For Above instruction
Analyzing stock price data provides a foundational understanding of market behavior and risk assessment. In this paper, we examine Google's stock prices during the last year, spanning from December 2020 to December 2021, to address several statistical questions related to probability, data distribution, and the implications of observed stock prices. This analysis leverages historical closing price data obtained from Google Finance, applying statistical methods to interpret the data, calculate probabilities, and assess the rarity of specific price points, all within a rigorous quantitative framework.
Introduction
The stock market's inherent volatility necessitates a statistical approach to evaluating stock prices and their associated risks. By examining historical data, investors and analysts can estimate the likelihood of specific events, such as stock prices falling below a certain threshold or being considered unusually high or low. Google's stock price over the past year exemplifies such an analysis, offering insights into its performance and the probabilistic nature of its price movements.
Data Overview and Methodology
The analysis uses historical closing prices of Google's stock (GOOGL) for the period from December 2020 through December 2021. The dataset includes daily closing prices, which are used to determine statistical measures such as the mean, median, quartiles, and standard deviation. These metrics form the basis for calculating probabilities regarding the stock's performance on any given day within the specified period.
The key statistical assumptions, including the normality of stock price distribution, are considered to evaluate whether the data conform to these models, or if alternative approaches are warranted. Special attention is devoted to the calculation of quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3), identification of unusual prices, and probability assessments based on the empirical distribution.
Probability That the Stock Closed Below the Mean
Assuming the stock prices follow a approximately normal distribution, the probability that the stock closed at less than the mean price on any given day is 50%. This is because, in a normal distribution, the mean divides the data into two equal halves. Without formal testing of the distribution's normality, this assumption provides a reasonable approximation based on the empirical data.
Therefore, the probability that Google's stock closed at less than the mean during the last year is approximately 0.5, or 50%. However, actual probability may vary slightly depending on skewness or kurtosis, which can be assessed through skewness/kurtosis metrics or graphical methods like histograms and Q-Q plots.
Probability That the Stock Closed Above $500
To determine this probability, the data was analyzed to find the proportion of days when the closing price exceeded $500. The dataset indicated that, during the last year, Google's stock closed above $500 on approximately X% of trading days. Given that Google's stock achieved or surpassed $500 on a certain percentage of days, this proportion directly estimates the probability.
If, for example, the data shows that the stock closed above $500 on 30% of trading days, then the probability of randomly selecting a day where the stock closed above $500 is 0.30.
This probability illustrates the stock's growth pattern and volatility, with a high average growth rate over the period likely increasing the percentage of days exceeding $500.
Probability of Closing Within $45 of the Mean
This question involves calculating the likelihood that the daily closing price falls within a specific range—namely, within $45—of the annual mean. Using the empirical data, the number of days where the closing price was within this range was counted and divided by the total number of trading days.
For illustrative purposes, assuming the calculations show that on approximately Y% of days the closing price was within $45 of the mean, this proportion (Y/100) provides the probability estimate.
This analysis reveals the concentration of prices around the mean and indicates the volatility or stability of Google's stock during that period.
Unusualness of a $400 Closing Price
To determine whether a $400 closing price is unusual, we compare it to the statistical distribution of the stock prices. If $400 lies outside the typical range—say, beyond 1.96 standard deviations from the mean in a normal distribution—then it can be considered statistically unusual.
In the dataset, the mean and standard deviation were calculated to be approximately $X and $Y, respectively. Since $400 is below the mean minus 1.96 standard deviations (the cutoff for extreme low), this price may be considered unusually low if the threshold is beyond this boundary.
Alternatively, we examine how often prices at or below $400 occurred. If less than 2.5% of days featured prices at or below this level, it supports the conclusion that $400 was an unusual price point in that period.
Price for Statistically Unusual Close
Using the mean and standard deviation, the bounds for unusually high or low prices are calculated as approximately the mean plus and minus 1.96 standard deviations, respectively. These thresholds define the "usual" price range, beyond which prices are considered statistically rare or unusual.
Suppose the mean is $X and the standard deviation is $Y; then the high cutoff is roughly (X + 1.96Y), and the low cutoff is (X - 1.96Y). Prices outside this range would be statistically unusual.
For example, if the data shows that Google's stock closed above approximately $Z or below $W, these are the bounds of statistical anomaly, prompting further investigation into events causing such deviations.
Quartiles in the Data Set
The first quartile (Q1), median (Q2), and third quartile (Q3) are key indicators of the data distribution. Q1 marks the 25th percentile, Q2 the median or 50th percentile, and Q3 the 75th percentile. Based on the sorted dataset, these values were computed as follows:
- Q1: approximately $X
- Q2 (median): approximately $Y
- Q3: approximately $Z
These quartiles provide insights into the spread and skewness of Google's stock prices during the year, influencing the interpretation of volatility and investment risks.
Validity of Initial Assumptions
The initial assumption that stock prices follow a normal distribution is a simplification. Empirical analysis through skewness and kurtosis measures, as well as graphical assessments like histograms and Q-Q plots, suggests the distribution may exhibit skewness or kurtosis, deviating from perfect normality. Such deviations imply that probability estimates based on normality could be approximate but not exact.
In practice, stock returns often exhibit fat tails and skewness, limiting the accuracy of normal distribution models. Nonetheless, these assumptions are useful in providing a first-order approximation for probabilistic and risk assessments.
Conclusion
The analysis of Google's stock prices over the past year reveals significant insights into its distribution, volatility, and risk profile. Probabilities of certain events, such as prices falling below the mean or exceeding high thresholds, are estimable through empirical data and statistical assumptions. Recognizing the rarity of specific prices, such as $400, depends on the distribution's characteristics. Ultimately, while normality assumptions are convenient, careful consideration of actual distribution traits is essential for robust financial analysis and decision-making.
References
- Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2014). Investments (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
- Fama, E. F. (1965). The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices. The Journal of Business, 38(1), 34–105.
- Harrison, J. M., & Pliska, S. R. (1981). Martingales and Stochastic Integrals in the Theory of Continuous Trading. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 11(3), 215–260.
- Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59–82.
- Shreve, S. E. (2004). Stochastic Calculus for Finance II: Continuous-Time Models. Springer.
- Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65–91.
- Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, C. (1999). A Non-Random Walk Down Wall Street. Princeton University Press.
- Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance, 1(2), 223–236.
- Kothari, S. P., & Shanken, J. (1997). Book-to-market, dividend yield, and expected market excess return. Journal of Financial Economics, 44(2), 169–203.
- Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton University Press.