References: Badshah S. 2012. Historical Study Of Leadership

Referencesbadshah S 2012 Historical Study Of Leadership Theories

Referencesbadshah S 2012 Historical Study Of Leadership Theories

Referencesbadshah S 2012 Historical Study Of Leadership Theories

References Badshah, S. (2012). Historical study of leadership theories. Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management, 1(1), 49. Doi number or link needed. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. City/state: Psychology Press. Bennis, W. (1959). Leadership theory and administrative behaviour: The problems of authority. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4. Doi number or link needed. Chaudhry, A. Q., & Javed, H. (2012). Impact of transactional and laissez-faire leadership style on motivation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7). Doi number or link needed. Clarke, S. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(1), 22-49. Doi number or link needed. Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 4-17. Doi number or link needed. Irgens, O. M. (1995). Situational leadership: A modification Hersey and Blanchard. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 16(2), 36. Doi number or link needed. Landis, E. A., Hill, D., & Harvey, M. R. (2014). A synthesis of leadership theories and styles. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 15(2), 97. Doi number or link needed. Luo, H., & Liu, S. (2014). Effect of situational leadership and employee readiness match on organizational citizenship behavior in China. Social behavior and personality: An international journal, 42(10), . Doi number or link needed. McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 117. Doi number or link needed. Peterson, S. J., Galvin, B. M., & Lange, D. (2012). CEO servant leadership: Exploring executive characteristics and firm performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(3), . Doi number or link needed. Sedjaya, S., & Sarros, J. C. (2002). “Servant leadership: its origin, development, and application in organizations,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(2), pp. 57–64. Shek, D. T., Chung, P. P., & Leung, H. (2015). How unique is the service leadership model? A comparison with contemporary leadership approaches. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 14(3), . Doi number or link needed. Smith, M. A. (2011). Are you a transformational leader? Nursing Management, 42(9), 44-50. Doi number or link needed. Uzohue, C., Yaya, J., & Akintayo, O. A. (2016). A review of leadership theories, principles, styles and their relevance to management of health science libraries in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy, 1(1), 17-26. Doi number or link needed. Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15-32. Doi number or link needed.

Paper For Above instruction

Leadership theories have been studied extensively over the centuries, offering diverse perspectives on what constitutes effective leadership and how leaders influence their followers and organizations. According to Badshah (2012), a comprehensive historical review of leadership theories reveals an evolution from trait-based approaches to more dynamic, process-oriented models. This paper explores the major leadership theories, their development over time, and their practical implications in contemporary management settings.

Introduction

Leadership is a complex social influence process that involves guiding and motivating individuals toward achieving objectives. Theories of leadership aim to explain how leaders can effectively influence their followers and organizations. Over time, leadership theories have shifted from emphasizing innate traits to understanding behaviors, situational variables, and relational dynamics. This evolution reflects the increasing recognition that effective leadership depends on a combination of personal attributes, contextual factors, and relational skills.

Historical Development of Leadership Theories

The earliest approaches to leadership focused on trait theories, suggesting that certain inherent qualities predispose individuals to be effective leaders. Bennis (1959) emphasized the significance of leadership traits such as intelligence, confidence, and integrity. However, trait theories were limited in their ability to explain why some leaders succeed in certain situations but not others. Subsequently, behavioral theories emerged, which analyzed specific leadership behaviors, classified as either task-oriented or relationship-oriented (Yukl et al., 2002).

McCleskey (2014) highlights that behavioral models like Ohio State and Michigan studies identified key leadership behaviors but failed to account for situational variables. This led to situational leadership theories, such as Hersey and Blanchard’s (Irgens, 1995) model, recognizing that effective leadership depends on matching leadership style with follower readiness and specific circumstances.

Transformational and Transactional Leadership

Transformational leadership, introduced by Bass and Riggio (2006), emphasizes inspiring followers through vision, motivation, and intellectual stimulation, leading to higher levels of performance and engagement. Goleman (2000) demonstrated the importance of emotional intelligence and the ability of leaders to adapt their style based on context. Conversely, transactional leadership focuses on exchanges, rewards, and penalties to influence follower behavior, often resulting in short-term compliance but limited innovation (Chaudhry & Javed, 2012).

Clarke (2013) reviewed how transformational and transactional styles serve as antecedents of safety behaviors, emphasizing that effective safety leadership combines both styles depending on situational requirements.

Servant Leadership and Contemporary Approaches

Servant leadership, articulated by Sedjaya and Sarros (2002), emphasizes serving followers' needs to enable their development and empowerment. It aligns with contemporary values of ethical and participative leadership, fostering trust and collaboration (Smith, 2011). Shek et al. (2015) compare the service leadership model with other approaches, highlighting its emphasis on moral and social responsibility.

Other recent leadership models incorporate emotional intelligence, cultural sensitivity, and stakeholder engagement, reflecting a broader understanding of effective leadership in diverse contexts (Landis et al., 2014).

The Practical Relevance of Leadership Theories

Understanding leadership theories enables managers and organizations to adapt their leadership styles to different situations effectively. For example, Goleman (2000) advocates for emotional intelligence as a core competency for successful leaders. Similarly, Situational Leadership Theory by Hersey and Blanchard underscores the importance of diagnosing follower readiness and adjusting leadership behavior accordingly (Luo & Liu, 2014).

Leadership styles influence organizational outcomes such as motivation, productivity, and innovation. Uzohue et al. (2016) argue that applicable leadership principles in health science libraries in Nigeria demonstrate the importance of contextually relevant behaviors and principles.

Conclusion

The volume of research and diverse theoretical approaches underscore that effective leadership is multifaceted and context-dependent. From trait-based to transformational and servant leadership models, each framework offers insights into influencing followers effectively. Leaders today must be adaptable, emotionally intelligent, and ethically oriented to meet the demands of dynamic organizational environments.

In summary, the ongoing evolution of leadership theories reflects a shift towards more holistic and ethical approaches, emphasizing the importance of relational, situational, and moral dimensions of leadership.

References

  • Badshah, S. (2012). Historical study of leadership theories. Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management, 1(1), 49. Doi: [Insert DOI here]
  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
  • Bennis, W. (1959). Leadership theory and administrative behaviour: The problems of authority. Administrative Science Quarterly.
  • Chaudhry, A. Q., & Javed, H. (2012). Impact of transactional and laissez-faire leadership style on motivation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7). Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • Clarke, S. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(1), 22-49. Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 4-17. Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • Irgens, O. M. (1995). Situational leadership: A modification Hersey and Blanchard. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 16(2), 36. Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • Landis, E. A., Hill, D., & Harvey, M. R. (2014). A synthesis of leadership theories and styles. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 15(2), 97. Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • Luo, H., & Liu, S. (2014). Effect of situational leadership and employee readiness match on organizational citizenship behavior in China. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(10). Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 117. Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • Peterson, S. J., Galvin, B. M., & Lange, D. (2012). CEO servant leadership: Exploring executive characteristics and firm performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(3). Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • Sedjaya, S., & Sarros, J. C. (2002). “Servant leadership: its origin, development, and application in organizations,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(2), pp. 57–64. Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • Shek, D. T., Chung, P. P., & Leung, H. (2015). How unique is the service leadership model? A comparison with contemporary leadership approaches. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 14(3). Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • Smith, M. A. (2011). Are you a transformational leader? Nursing Management, 42(9), 44-50. Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • Uzohue, C., Yaya, J., & Akintayo, O. A. (2016). A review of leadership theories, principles, styles and their relevance to management of health science libraries in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy, 1(1), 17-26. Doi: [Insert DOI]
  • Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15-32. Doi: [Insert DOI]

Related Assignments