Reflect On A Project You Were Involved In

Instructionsreflect On A Project That You Were Involved In Or One Of W

Reflect on a project that you were involved in or one of which you have knowledge. What techniques were used to determine the activity durations? Were the activity durations basically a guess based on subject matter expertise, or was a formula used to calculate the activity durations? Why was this method chosen? Was it an accurate measure of activity durations? Why, or why not? Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

Paper For Above instruction

In this reflection, I will discuss a project I was involved in that required determining activity durations within a project management context. The project was the development of a new software platform for a mid-sized organization, and accurate scheduling was essential to meet deadlines and stay within budget. To determine the activity durations, the planning team employed a combination of techniques, primarily relying on expert judgment supplemented by historical data from similar past projects.

The primary method used was expert judgment, where project managers and experienced team members estimated durations based on their knowledge and experience with similar tasks. For example, tasks like coding modules or testing phases were estimated based on comparable previous assignments. These estimates were refined through discussions and consensus-building among team members who had direct experience with the activities in question.

In addition to expert judgment, the team used parametric estimating techniques for certain activities. For instance, the duration of testing phases was calculated using a formula that related the number of test cases to the expected testing time, based on historical data. This approach allowed for more objective and quantifiable estimates, especially in areas where historical data was available and reliable.

The choice of these methods was driven by the need for balancing accuracy and efficiency. Expert judgment was quick and utilized the rich experiential knowledge of the team, but it inherently contained some degree of subjectivity and potential bias. The parametric formulas, on the other hand, provided a more systematic and data-driven approach, reducing the risk of overly optimistic or pessimistic estimates.

The accuracy of these activity duration estimates varied depending on the activity. Tasks like coding and testing were generally well-estimated because the team had previous experience and reliable historical data. However, some activities involving innovative solutions or new technology were more challenging to estimate accurately. In these cases, estimates were more guesswork-based, and the team accounted for this uncertainty by including contingency buffers in the schedule.

Overall, combining expert judgment with parametric formulas proved effective in creating a realistic schedule. The approach allowed for flexibility and adjustments as the project progressed, leading to better control over the project timeline. While no estimation technique can guarantee absolute accuracy, using multiple methods helped mitigate risks and improved the reliability of activity duration estimates.

In conclusion, estimating activity durations is a nuanced process that benefits from a mix of expert knowledge and data-driven formulas. The chosen techniques in this project reflect the need to balance speed, accuracy, and adaptability. Continuous monitoring and updating of estimates throughout the project lifecycle are essential to maintaining schedule integrity and ensuring successful project delivery.

References

• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
• PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition. Project Management Institute.
• Fleming, Q. W., & Koppelman, J. M. (2016). Earned Value Project Management. Project Management Institute.
• Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management JumpStart. Wiley.
• Jeston, J., & Nelis, J. (2018). Business Process Management (BPM): Practical Guidelines to Successful Implementations. Routledge.
• Verzuh, E. (2015). The Fast Forward MBA in Project Management. John Wiley & Sons.
• Lev, B. (2013). Business Intelligence and Analytics: Systems for Decision Support. Pearson Education.
• Williams, T. (2018). How to Measure Project Management Success. Harvard Business Review.
• Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme. Wiley.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2017). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.