Reflection On Leadership Approach To Managing Diverse Work G

Reflection on Leadership Approach to Managing Diverse Work Groups in the Army

Leadership is a concept that is widely discussed in different contexts and applied in numerous scenarios. In the military environment, especially within the army, leadership is a vital subject warranting thorough research. Given the complexity and diversity of the army's personnel, understanding leadership approaches suited to managing diverse workgroups becomes essential. This reflective journal explores various leadership styles applicable within the Army's diverse settings, considering factors such as task nature, staff motivation, experience levels, and cultural backgrounds.

Throughout my course and personal study of military leadership, I have gained substantial insights into the influences shaping leadership styles in army units. I recognize that leadership approaches are contingent upon several factors, including task type, mission objectives, motivation levels, age and experience differences among soldiers, and the dynamic between leaders and followers. Wisecarver et al. (2011) support this view, emphasizing that task complexity and staff experience significantly influence whether a leader adopts participative, transformational, delegative, or directive styles.

For example, with new recruits or personnel with limited experience, a participative style encouraging involvement can foster confidence and skill development. Conversely, during combat or high-stakes missions, a directive, direct approach is often necessary to ensure clarity and swift decision-making. Transformational leadership can be particularly effective in managing diversity by fostering an inclusive environment where all personnel feel valued and heard, thereby enhancing motivation and cohesion.

The management of diversity in the army also involves addressing inherent challenges such as generational gaps, cultural differences, and background disparities. These issues can create misunderstandings, reduce team effectiveness, and hinder mission success. Cultural orientation perspectives provide a framework for understanding how leaders can adapt their interactions to accommodate varying cultural norms and beliefs, promoting mutual respect and understanding. Perceptions and expectations perspectives further emphasize that a leader’s understanding of followers’ backgrounds influences their leadership approach and effectiveness.

However, implementing these leadership styles and managing diversity presents challenges, especially in environments with restricted access to data, such as military barracks. Primary data collection is often hindered by security, confidentiality, and logistical barriers, which complicate research efforts. Despite these obstacles, exploring the leadership approaches and challenges in managing diverse groups provides valuable insights that can enhance military leadership practices and policies.

This research holds significant importance for military leadership development. It contributes to existing knowledge by elucidating the applicability and effectiveness of various leadership styles within diverse army settings. Understanding the influence of cultural, generational, and experiential factors on leadership can help military leaders tailor their approaches to foster unity, efficiency, and mission success. As future military leaders or researchers, we must appreciate the nuanced interplay between leadership styles and diversity, striving to develop adaptive strategies that meet the complex demands of modern warfare and peacekeeping missions.

In conclusion, effective management of diverse work groups in the army hinges on a leader’s ability to adapt their style to the contextual variables and personnel characteristics. Transformational leadership, combined with an awareness of cultural and generational differences, offers a promising approach to fostering an inclusive and motivated military environment. Going forward, further research should focus on empirical studies that examine the outcomes of different leadership strategies in diverse military settings, thus providing evidence-based guidance for military leadership training programs.

References

• Wisecarver, M., Schneider, R., Foldes, H., Cullen, M., & Zbylut, M. R. (2011). Knowledge, skills, and abilities for military leader influence. PERSONNEL DECISIONS RESEARCH INST INC ARLINGTON VA.
• Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 544-563.
• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
• Gentry, W. A., & Murphy, S. E. (2009). Leadership in the military: A review of the literature. Military Psychology, 21(1), 15-32.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education.
• Angwin, D. (2007). Leadership and cultural values: The case of UK and US companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 249-262.
• Hogg, M. A., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2017). Social identity theory and leadership. In The nature of leadership (pp. 102-123). Sage.
• Johnson, C. E. (2018). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership. Sage Publications.
• Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill Book Company.