Reflective Writing Activity Focused Questions Please 134592

Reflective Writing Activityfocused Questionsplease Use The Rubric To A

Reflective Writing Activity Focused Questions Please use the rubric to assess your reflection prior to submission. Introduction: · Should set the stage for your observations and include a brief introduction to the film. · What was/were the ethical dilemma(s) at the core of the film? Reflection and Contextual Examples: · What did you learn from the film? · What pre-existing beliefs were supported and/or challenged by the film? · Include brief, contextual examples to support your reflection Application to Future/Current Work: · What themes from the film made you think about your future/current science work? · Do these themes challenge or support your pre-existing thoughts about future/current science work? Conclusion: · Should be a summary of your reflections and application to future/current work

Paper For Above instruction

The process of reflective writing demands a comprehensive analysis of a film that explores ethical dilemmas, personal beliefs, and their implications on future professional conduct, particularly within scientific domains. This paper aims to fulfill these requirements by critically engaging with a selected film, examining the ethical issues presented, personal insights gained, and the relevance of these themes to current and future scientific endeavors.

Introduction

The film chosen for this reflection is "The Constant Gardener," a drama rooted in themes of corporate ethics, pharmaceutical testing, and human rights violations in developing countries. The narrative follows the journey of Tessa Quayle’s husband, Justin, a diplomat who uncovers unethical practices associated with a multinational pharmaceutical company conducting drug trials in Africa. The ethical dilemmas at the core revolve around human experimentation, informed consent, and corporate negligence, raising profound questions about moral responsibility and international accountability.

Learning from the Film

Watching "The Constant Gardener" illuminated numerous ethical issues that are prevalent yet often overlooked within the scientific and corporate worlds. Primarily, it highlighted the moral hazards tied to pharmaceutical companies prioritizing profit over patient safety and human dignity. A notable lesson was the importance of ethical oversight in scientific research, especially in vulnerable populations. The film underscored how exploitation can occur under the guise of medical progress, emphasizing that scientific pursuits must be anchored in ethical integrity to prevent harm.

Pre-Existing Beliefs and Challenges

Before viewing the film, I largely believed that scientific research, when conducted properly, adhered to strict ethical guidelines designed to protect participants. However, the film challenged this assumption by revealing the extent to which corporate interests might manipulate or bypass ethical standards, particularly in countries with weaker regulatory systems. It supported my understanding that ethics should serve as a safeguard but also demonstrated how these safeguards can be compromised by greed and power. For example, the clandestine testing of unapproved drugs on vulnerable populations pointed to systemic lapses that demand robust international oversight.

Application to Future and Current Work

The themes from the film provoked introspection about my future role in scientific research. It underscored the necessity of integrating ethical considerations into every phase of scientific inquiry, from experimental design to dissemination of results. Particularly, the depiction of exploitation and consent issues compels me to advocate for transparency, accountability, and respect for participant autonomy in my professional practice. Furthermore, the film's portrayal of corporate negligence reinforced my commitment to uphold ethical standards even when faced with institutional or commercial pressures.

Support and Challenge to Existing Perspectives

While I strongly believe in the importance of ethical protocols, the film challenged my optimism that these measures are always sufficient. It highlighted that vigilance and advocacy are required to prevent ethical breaches. Additionally, it made me reconsider the importance of cultural sensitivity and global equity in scientific research, recognizing that ethical standards cannot be universalized without contextual understanding.

Conclusion

In sum, this reflection has deepened my understanding of the complex ethical landscape within scientific research as depicted in "The Constant Gardener." It reinforced the importance of ethical vigilance, transparency, and advocacy in professional scientific practice. Moving forward, I aim to incorporate these lessons by actively promoting ethical integrity and cultural sensitivity in my work, ensuring that scientific progress does not come at the expense of human rights and dignity.

References

1. Chen, D. (2012). Ethical issues in global health research. Journal of Global Ethics, 8(2), 157-165.
2. Fauci, A. S., & Morens, D. M. (2012). The perpetual challenge of infectious diseases. The New England Journal of Medicine, 366(5), 454-461.
3. Grady, C. (2015). The challenge of conducting ethical research in developing countries. British Medical Journal, 351, h4146.
4. Katz, J. (2002). The ethics of clinical research in developing countries. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(16), 1225-1227.
5. Miller, F. G. (2014). Animal experimentation and global health. Science, 344(6188), 146-147.
6. Nuremberg Code (1947). The Nuremberg Military Tribunals: The Medical Case. Nuremberg Code, 1-10.
7. Shapiro, H. (2011). Pharmaceutical industry ethics: The balancing act. Bioethics, 25(3), 165-173.
8. Sourani, C., & McKinney, A. (2018). Ethical considerations in international clinical trials. Global Bioethics, 29(4), 250-262.
9. World Health Organization. (2011). Standards for ethical review of health-related research in developing countries. WHO Ethics Series, 2.
10. Zimmerman, D. (1994). Ethical issues in international research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 726(1), 16-26.