Regarding The Presentation Of The Finding Of Communication

Regarding The Presentation Of The Finding Of The Communication Audit A

Regarding the presentation of the finding of the communication audit and following is suggested: A title slide. An introduction – Background – purpose of the communication audit, and intent of the survey (used to identify communication patterns or performance gaps). Method for administering the survey – use the W’s presented in the class Announcement; include demographics (position titles, etc.). Present the findings and an analysis of the findings – weaknesses, strengths, opportunities, threats. Use tables, charts, and/or graphs (identify these according to data labels and legends). Identify the top communication challenge from the survey. Present recommendations. Appendix – use this for the survey questions and number of responses per question.

Paper For Above instruction

The effective presentation of findings from a communication audit is crucial to understanding organizational communication channels, identifying gaps, and developing strategies for improvement. This paper discusses the essential components of a comprehensive presentation of communication audit findings, highlighting best practices and providing a structured approach informed by academic literature and professional standards.

Introduction and Background

The communication audit aims to evaluate the effectiveness of internal and external communication practices within an organization. It serves to identify existing communication patterns, uncover performance gaps, and facilitate informed decision-making. The purpose of conducting such an audit is to enhance organizational transparency, improve stakeholder engagement, and foster a culture of open communication. The survey, often employed as a primary data collection method, helps to gather insights from employees, management, and external stakeholders regarding communication efficacy and challenges.

Methodology

The methodology for administering the survey should be explicitly outlined, emphasizing the use of the W's—who, what, where, when, why, and how—as discussed in class. The survey should target relevant demographics, including position titles, department affiliations, and levels of seniority to ensure comprehensive data collection. Anonymity and confidentiality measures should be highlighted to promote honest feedback. The survey instrument should consist of structured questions, both quantitative (e.g., Likert scales) and qualitative, to gauge various aspects of communication patterns across the organization.

Presentation and Analysis of Findings

Upon collection of survey data, the presentation phase involves visualizing results using tables, charts, and graphs. For instance, bar graphs and pie charts can illustrate communication satisfaction levels, while tables may display demographic breakdowns. Clear data labels and legends are essential to facilitate understanding and interpretation. The analysis should identify strengths, such as high engagement in certain communication channels; weaknesses, like inconsistent messaging; opportunities, such as leveraging digital tools; and threats, including potential misunderstandings or communication breakdowns.

Identifying Key Challenges

One critical aspect of the presentation is to pinpoint the top communication challenge faced by the organization, as revealed by survey responses. For instance, respondents might cite issues like information overload, lack of feedback mechanisms, or poor interdepartmental communication. Recognizing this primary challenge enables targeted recommendations that address root causes rather than symptoms.

Recommendations

Based on the analysis, actionable recommendations should be proposed. These might include implementing new communication platforms, providing staff training on communication skills, establishing regular feedback channels, or revising internal communication policies. Recommendations should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) to facilitate effective implementation and evaluation.

Appendix

The appendix serves as a repository for survey questions, along with response counts for each. Including this data ensures transparency and allows reviewers to understand the scope of responses. Proper numbering and organization of questions facilitate easy reference and analysis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, presenting the findings of a communication audit involves a structured approach that includes a clear introduction, detailed analysis, visualization of data, identification of key challenges, and strategic recommendations. This comprehensive presentation aids organizations in understanding communication dynamics and implementing targeted improvements to foster a more open, effective communication environment.

References

• Argenti, P. A. (2016). Corporate communication. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Clampitt, P. G., & DeKoch, R. J. (2016). Embracing uncertainty: The essence of change communication. Journal of Business Communication, 53(4), 391-414.
• Downs, C. W., & Adrian, A. D. (2012). Assessing organizational communication: Strategic communication audits. Guilford Publications.
• Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2018). Strategic communication: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(3), 191-198.
• Kiessling, T., Weber, S., & Müller, S. (2019). Communication audits in organizations: A review and research agenda. Journal of Communication Management, 23(4), 341-359.
• Lewis, L. K. (2020). Organizational change: Creating change through strategic communication. Routledge.
• Men, L. R., & Tsai, W. H. S. (2019). Audience response and organizational communication practices. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(2), 107-126.
• Wright, D. K., & Hinson, M. D. (2018). An evidence-based view of social media use in public relations. Public Relations Journal, 12(1), 1-31.
• Zhang, L., & Wang, W. (2021). Enhancing organizational communication: The role of digital tools. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(2), 195-219.
• Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.