Regarding The Submission Deadline For The Papernote The Refl

Regarding The Submission Deadline For The Papernote The Reflection Pa

Regarding the submission deadline for the papernote: The reflection paper must be submitted by the deadline as stated in the course calendar. Failure to submit on time will result in a grade of zero. Extensions are only granted with a signed note from a medical or work supervisor on official letterhead, submitted within 24 hours of the deadline, certifying inability to submit due to emergency. Requests without proper documentation and if not currently passing the class will not be considered.

Students must view the plagiarism presentation before submitting their reflection paper. The assignment involves writing a word response to one of four provided articles, demonstrating understanding of the main argument, supporting evidence, personal agreement or disagreement, and application of course readings. Only the Dalrymple article and textbook are to be used as sources. The paper should reflect critical analysis, coherence, and proper argument structure, following MLA format.

The essay should include an introduction, body, and conclusion, and demonstrate independent thought. Short quotations should be used appropriately, with explanations provided. The paper must meet all components of the rubric, including understanding, argument clarity, and technical correctness. Only one attempt is permitted; work must be carefully proofread to avoid errors.

Submission is done via the provided link, either by attaching a Word file or pasting the paper. Students are encouraged to utilize the North Lake College Online Writing Lab for feedback before submission.

Paper For Above instruction

The reflection paper is a critical component of the course that requires students to engage deeply with philosophical texts, analyze arguments, and demonstrate their understanding through clear, structured writing. The precise guidelines emphasize the importance of originality, proper citation, and adherence to academic integrity policies, particularly concerning plagiarism and academic dishonesty.

The primary task mandates analyzing one of four selected articles: "The Frivolity of Evil," "How and How Not to Love Mankind," "What We Have to Lose," or "Roads to Serfdom." Students are expected to craft a comprehensive, thoughtful response addressing five specific points: the author's main argument, supporting evidence or ancillary arguments, personal stance, reasons for agreement or disagreement, and the application of insights from the course readings.

This assignment serves multiple educational purposes. First, it assesses students' comprehension of complex philosophical concepts, requiring accurate interpretation and explanation of issues. Second, it evaluates their ability to construct a coherent and persuasive argument supported by philosophical reasoning. Third, it encourages critical evaluation through the application of insights from course texts, fostering a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of philosophical ideas.

A significant emphasis is placed on clarity and precision. The essay must begin with a clear introduction outlining the main points and include well-organized paragraphs that develop each point logically. Proper use of terminology, avoidance of block quotations, and judicious incorporation of quotations—no more than 10% of the paper—are mandatory. The paper should reflect the student’s voice, demonstrating both comprehension and independent thought.

Formatting must adhere to MLA style, including proper citation of all sources, which are limited to the Dalrymple article and the textbook. The importance of academic integrity is underscored by the strict policies against plagiarism and unauthorized use of sources. Any misrepresentation of sources or failure to credit material results in a zero on the assignment with no opportunity for makeup.

The submission process is straightforward but important. Only one submission attempt is allowed; students are advised to review their work thoroughly before submitting. Utilizing resources like the North Lake College Online Writing Lab can enhance the quality of the paper, providing valuable feedback to ensure compliance with academic standards.

Overall, this reflective essay requires a careful balance of analytical rigor, philosophical understanding, and effective communication. It offers an opportunity for students to demonstrate mastery of course concepts, their ability to critically engage with philosophical texts, and their capacity to articulate reasoned arguments in a clear, compelling manner.

References

1. Dalrymple, T. (Year). [Title of the Dalrymple article]. [Publication details].
2. Berlin, I. (1958). Two Concepts of Liberty. The Isaiah Berlin Virtual Library. Retrieved from https://www.irvingberlin.org/two-concepts-of-liberty/
3. Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
4. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books.
5. Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty. Penguin Classics.
6. Hayek, F. A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Routledge.
7. Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Viking Press.
8. Locke, J. (1689). Two Treatises of Government. Awnsham Churchill.
9. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
10. Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty. Penguin Classics.