Regression Forecasting In Major League Baseball

Question

Regression Forecasting1 In Major League Baseball The National Lea Regression & Forecasting 1. In major league baseball, the National League consists of 16 teams. Below is the number of victories of each team in the 2006 season over a 162 game season along with each team’s seasonal payroll. Using the regression model results below to predict the number of victories based on the seasonal payroll. Using regression analysis questions below, discuss the effectiveness of this model. Team Payroll ($M) Victories Mets Astros Dodgers Cubs Giants Cardinals Phillies Braves Padres Nationals Reds Diamondbacks Brewers Rockies Pirates Marlins SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Output Regression Statistics Multiple R: 0.49 R Square: 0.24 Adjusted R Square: 0.19 Standard Error: 7.25 Observations: 16 ANOVA Degrees of Freedom, SS, MS, F, Significance F Regression: df = 1, SS = 0.054, MS = 0.054, F = 1.54, Significance F = 0.24 Residual: df = 14, SS = 0.58, MS = 0.041 Total: df = 15, SS = 0.4375 Coefficients Table Intercept: 67.05, Standard Error: 5.32, t Stat: 12.60, P-value: 0.0001 X Variable (Payroll): Coefficient: 0.054, Standard Error: 0.022, t Stat: 2.45, P-value: 0.026 Find (specify) the best model to predict MLB team victories. Predict team victories based on a team payroll of $101M. How well does the model explain victories? Discuss in detail. Is the model significant? Test at the critical value of 3.70.

Dr. Jack HW Helper · Accepted Answer

The analysis of the regression model connecting Major League Baseball (MLB) team victories to seasonal payroll offers critical insights into the effectiveness of payroll as a predictor of team success. Based on the provided regression output, we can evaluate the model's predictive power, significance, and practical utility. Identifying the Best Model: The model presented is a simple linear regression with victories as the dependent variable and payroll (in millions of dollars) as the independent variable. The regression statistic shows a multiple R of approximately 0.49, indicating a moderate positive correlation between payroll and victories, though not a very strong one. The R Square value of 0.24 implies that only about 24% of the variance in team victories can be explained by payroll alone. While this suggests payroll has some predictive capacity, it is not the sole determinant of success, and other factors might significantly influence victories. Prediction for a $101 million payroll: Utilizing the regression equation: Victories = Intercept + Coefficient * Payroll From the coefficients table, the intercept is 67.05, and the payroll coefficient is 0.054. Substituting the payroll value: Victories = 67.05 + 0.054 * 101 ≈ 67.05 + 5.454 ≈ 72.50 Thus, a team with a $101 million payroll is predicted to achieve approximately 72.5 victories in the season. Model Effectiveness and Significance: The p-value associated with the payroll coefficient is approximately 0.026, which is below the common alpha level of 0.05, indicating that payroll is statistically significant as a predictor of victories. The t-statistic of around 2.45 further supports this conclusion. However, the low R Square suggests that payroll alone explains only a small portion of the variance in victories, implying that other variables such as team skill, player health, coaching, and strategy likely play substantial roles. Assessing the model's significance at the critical F value of 3.70: The F statistic h

Regression Forecasting1 In Major League Baseball The National Lea

Regression Output

Paper For Above instruction

Related Assignments