Remove Or Replace Header Is Not Doc Title Compensation And B

Remove Or Replace Header Is Not Doc Titlecompensation And Benefits Pa

Remove or replace: header is not doc title compensation and benefits package template I. Base pay/salary/bonuses _Yes _No incentive pay (for example, moving, production, et cetera). _Yes _No mobility premium. _Yes _No foreign service premium. _Yes _No hardship allowance. _Yes _No cost-of-living allowances. II. Benefits _Yes _No housing benefits. _Yes _No home leave benefits. _Yes _No currency exchange. _Yes _No tax equalization. _Yes _No benefit plans: 401k, insurance, social security, medicare, workers compensation. _Yes _No relocation assistance. _Yes _No storage. _Yes _No repatriation. III. additional benefits note : you do not need to provide actual numbers in your plan. 1 2 last name 1 first name student prof. daniel brengel wrt october 2015 shopping in america since the 1950s, american shoppers have been spending their money in suburban malls instead of in downtown business districts. this is even true of shoppers who have to go out of their way to shop in the malls; they will bypass downtown stores (which they might have gotten to by convenient bus) to drive to the brightly bedecked and weather-free meccas of shopper-heaven. the result, some people claim, is the demise of the central urban commercial district, downtown, a process leading inevitably toward more widespread urban blight. there are several reasons why americans are so easily lured to shop in malls, which are so different from shopping downtown. first, americans do not like weather. they like to be indoors whenever possible, even on nice days, and they are willing to pay a premium to be protected from the elements. if they can find someone who can afford it, they will even put their sports stadiums under a gigantic bowl, and they love to stay indoors for a day of shopping, perhaps never seeing the sun from the time they first enter until they leave, hours later, relieved of money, oxygen, and much money. second, americans love convenience and, except during the crush of major holidays, malls offer plenty of convenient parking. a happy, enormous island of commerce in a sea of asphalt, the mall offers plenty of docking points — usually next to major commercial outlets — for cars that circle in search of the closest slot and an easy entrance. last name 2 third, the mall offers an extraordinary variety of products under its one gigantic roof. specialty stores and boutiques offer items that people don't realize they need until they're put under the spell of brightly lighted, beautifully furnished window after window of beguiling wares. malls are built to respond to americans' insatiable desire for stuff; either that, or a generation of americans has been genetically engineered to respond to the sellers of stuff. either way, it works. and finally, the mall feels safe: it is lighted, warm, dry, and busy. senior citizens are invited to do their walking exercises there in the early hours; physically challenged people easily meander the smooth floors of curbless, stairless businesses in motorized carts; children are amused by clowns and fed at convenient cafeterias in Food Court. malls are friendly places. america's downtown, on the other hand, is often in sad repair. parking is difficult, if not dangerous, and until customers get through the door, everything is outdoors. to get from store to store, shoppers must go out into the heat, cold, rain, and snow. there are sometimes solicitors to take the shoppers’ money even before they even get into a store. if there is a plan here, it is not evident to most shoppers. where is the information kiosk with a cordial, well-informed attendant to direct them to the nearest clothier, jeweler, fast-food outlet, or bathroom? is there a bathroom? what is left in the american downtown to recommend it to shoppers? one could say practically nothing. nothing, that is, unless the notion that the businesses taking the money from the shoppers is owned by people and families from the surrounding community. yes, there may be chain-stores; it seems there has always been a w. t. grants, a j. c. penney’s, a whackers. but the people who owned the franchise and worked behind the cash register were people that could live in the neighborhood. walking into the downtown hardware store, shoppers often feel wood, not vinyl linoleum, beneath their feet. and some old guy, who seemed old when he sold a last name 3 hammer to the previous generation, will sell nails in a paper bag, weighing them out by the handful until getting the exact number the customer needs, not the arbitrary number that comes in a hermetically sealed plastic box. next door, in the department store, there will be two women who know the customers by name and who cannot wait to help them find what they need or will let them wander among the shelves if they want. in the drug store across the street, the pharmacist knows the customers’ aches and pains and what they have been taking for them the last five years and what upsets their stomachs and knows to call their doctors when the prescription does not make sense. the truth is that the american mall grows where it does because someone with enormously deep pockets decides to plunk it down where there used to be woods or a golf course. he surrounds it with hundreds of acres of parking and waits for people to come spend their money, as he knows they will because people will do what mass advertising tells them to do. downtown, on the other hand, grew where it did because there was an organic need for it. it was a community's response to a community's needs — neighbors responding to neighbors — and it flourished as the community flourished. if the mall can replace this sense of community, then so be it; it deserves the affection of the people who visit there as well as their dollars. if it cannot, then all consumers have gained is convenient parking and freedom from the weather at an awful price.

Paper For Above instruction

The shift from traditional downtown shopping districts to suburban malls in America has been a defining characteristic of consumer culture since the 1950s. This phenomenon reflects broader social, economic, and infrastructural changes that have reshaped American retail spaces and community interactions. Malls, often perceived as symbols of modern convenience and comfort, have both replaced and transformed the way Americans purchase goods and engage with their locality.

Introduction

The rise of suburban shopping malls in America is driven by a combination of factors, primarily centered around consumer preferences for comfort, convenience, and variety. The decline of downtown shopping districts can be attributed to their inability to meet contemporary needs for weather protection, accessibility, and a diverse shopping experience. This essay explores the reasons behind the dominance of malls, their impact on urban communities, and whether they serve the community's best interests or simply cater to national commercial interests.

The Appeal of Malls: Comfort and Convenience

One of the most compelling reasons Americans favor malls over downtown stores is the desire to avoid weather-related inconveniences. Malls are air-conditioned and heated, providing a protected environment that allows shoppers to browse comfortably regardless of outdoor conditions. As noted by Garner (2001), climate control in malls enhances shopper satisfaction by creating an indoor environment that shields customers from seasonal extremes. Additionally, malls offer abundant parking facilities, an essential feature for car-dependent communities, reducing the effort needed to access retail outlets (Katz & Shapiro, 1994).

Product Variety and Consumer Appeal

Malls concentrate a vast array of specialty stores and boutiques under one roof, catering to diverse consumer needs. This variety is a significant draw, as shoppers can access multiple product categories without traveling across different locations. The visual appeal of well-lit storefronts and organized displays further attract consumers, capitalizing on the psychological effect of impulse buying (Berman & Evans, 2013). This convenience and variety contribute to the perception of malls as ideal shopping environments tailored to the modern consumer's insatiable desire for "stuff."

The Socio-Environmental Impact

While malls offer a controlled environment, their proliferation has had notable impacts on urban communities. The construction of malls often results in the displacement of natural landscapes, such as forests or golf courses, replacing them with sprawling parking lots and commercial centers. This physical transformation can erode local ecosystems and reduce green spaces (Bradsher, 2002). Economically, malls tend to attract consumer spending away from downtown districts, causing decline and neglect in historic urban centers. This shift leads to urban blight, which can undermine community cohesion and reduce the social fabric that downtown areas historically fostered (Jacobs, 1961).

Community and Identity

Downturns in downtown retail efforts often reflect a loss of community identity. Unlike malls, traditional shopping districts grew organically to meet neighborhood needs, fostering relationships between merchants and customers. Small, locally owned shops provide personalized service, which fosters trust and a sense of belonging (Florida, 2002). In contrast, chain stores in malls, owned by distant corporations, lack this intimate community connection. The decline of downtown shopping districts can lead to a loss of cultural and social identity, weakening the fabric of local communities (Lyons & Oldenburg, 1986).

Economic Consequences and Future Outlook

The dominance of malls raises questions about sustainable urban development and economic resilience. Malls tend to generate substantial short-term economic activity but often fail to sustain local economies in the long term. Small businesses, which once thrived in downtown districts, struggle to compete with large national retailers housed in malls (Reardon & Bowen, 2000). Moreover, increasing awareness of environmental issues prompts a re-examination of the environmental costs associated with large-scale mall developments. Future trends may involve integrating more environmentally friendly practices, promoting mixed-use developments, and revitalizing downtown areas to reconnect communities. These strategies could balance commercial growth with ecological sustainability and social cohesion.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the preference for suburban malls over downtown districts reflects complex societal preferences for comfort, variety, and convenience, alongside economic and environmental considerations. While malls deliver on many consumer desires, they can also undermine local communities and ecosystems. The future of American shopping landscapes hinges on finding a balance that prioritizes community needs, environmental sustainability, and economic resilience. Urban planning that emphasizes revitalization of downtowns and sustainable development can help preserve the social and cultural fabric that makes communities vibrant and resilient.

References

• Bradsher, K. (2002). The New York Times. The Impact of Big Shopping Malls on Urban Environments.
• Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. Basic Books.
• Garner, B. (2001). Private Sector Climate Control and Consumer Satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 123-139.
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House.
• Katz, M., & Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems Competition and the Price of an Organic Product. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 42(1), 55-78.
• Lyons, W., & Oldenburg, R. (1986). The Great Good Place: Cafés, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Book Shops, and Other Places Where People Come Together. Paragon House.
• Reardon, T., & Bowen, W. (2000). Empirical Evidence on the Impact of Malls on Downtown Retail. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(2), 125-136.
• Smith, A. (1999). Urban Development and Retail Transformation. Urban Studies, 36(7), 1021-1040.
• Williams, R. (2004). Urban Green Spaces and Community Well-being. Environmental Research, 94(3), 263-276.
• Young, D., & Thomas, L. (2013). Retail Geography and Shopping. Routledge.