Required Assignment 2 – Manufacturing Budget Analysis ✓ Solved

Required Assignment 2—Manufacturing Budget Analysis

Identify the problems that appear to exist in Ferguson & Son Manufacturing Company's budgetary control system and explain how the problems are likely to reduce the effectiveness of the system.

Explain how Ferguson & Son Manufacturing Company's budgetary control system could be revised to improve its effectiveness.

Explain how the use of an activity-based costing system could change the results of the budget, if utilized.

Provide specific ways for how you would use a budget to change employee behavior and align goals in the organization.

Explain how goal alignment can improve profitability and overall return to the shareholders of the company.

Synthesize data to explain the concept of ROI and describe how the use of an activity-based costing system can improve the company’s ROI and the potential impact on free cash flow.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The effectiveness of a company's budgetary control system is vital for aligning operational goals with financial performance. Ferguson & Son Manufacturing Company faces unique challenges within their current system, which hampers operational efficiency and diminishes the potential for strategic growth. This paper critically analyzes existing problems, proposes improvements, explores the implications of activity-based costing (ABC), discusses behavioral motivations, and examines how goal alignment and ROI impact overall company success.

Problems in the Current Budgetary Control System

The fundamental issues in Ferguson & Son's budgetary control system stem from its rigidity, misalignment with operational realities, and its adverse impact on employee motivation. Firstly, the practice of tightening budgets immediately after departments meet targets discourages continuous improvement and fosters a culture of fear and compliance rather than innovation. This punitive approach stifles effort and undermines employee morale, as evidenced by Tom Emory and Jim Morris feeling demotivated and frustrated. Secondly, the system's focus on cost control without regard to quality or process efficiency leads to potential short-term savings at the expense of long-term productivity. For instance, the emphasis on meeting budgets may incentivize under-reporting or manipulating costs, which compromises data accuracy and strategic decision-making. Thirdly, the conflict between costing accuracy and performance measurement creates discrepancies—departments may hide waste or inefficiency to meet targets, further distorting performance data. Together, these issues undermine the core purpose of a budgetary control system: to foster operational efficiency, accountability, and continuous improvement.

Revisions to Improve the Budgetary Control System

To enhance effectiveness, Ferguson & Son should consider shifting from a punitive, cost-focused system to a more comprehensive, flexible approach centered around operational efficiency and strategic objectives. Implementing a participative budgeting process that involves department managers in setting realistic, attainable targets can foster ownership and accountability. This approach encourages collaboration and creates a sense of shared responsibility for achieving organizational goals. Additionally, moving toward a performance measurement system that emphasizes key performance indicators (KPIs) beyond mere cost control—such as quality metrics, machine uptime, and customer satisfaction—would provide a more holistic view of departmental performance.

Adopting a variance analysis framework that highlights trends and root causes rather than immediate penalties can help identify opportunities for process improvements. For example, instead of penalizing departments for exceeding budgets, management should analyze why overruns occur—whether due to unanticipated rush orders or machine breakdowns—and address systemic issues accordingly. Furthermore, integrating flexible budgets that account for seasonal or market-driven fluctuations can prevent unrealistic cost constraints, enabling departments to adapt dynamically. Finally, fostering a culture of continuous improvement through regular performance reviews and feedback sessions encourages proactive management and employee engagement.

The Role of Activity-Based Costing

Implementing an activity-based costing (ABC) system can significantly alter budget results and provide clearer insights into cost drivers. ABC allocates overhead costs based on actual activities that consume resources, such as setup, maintenance, or machine operation times. This detailed allocation improves cost accuracy, especially for complex manufacturing processes involving multiple products and activities. Consequently, budgets generated through ABC enable more precise variance analysis, revealing high-cost activities that may not be immediately obvious under traditional costing methods.

By identifying non-value-added activities, management can target cost reduction efforts more effectively. For example, if ABC reveals that setup time constitutes a significant overhead expense, efforts can be directed toward process improvements or standardization to reduce downtime. Additionally, ABC facilitates better product costing, enabling profitability analysis at a granular level, which supports strategic decision-making regarding product lines or market focuses. Consequently, integrating ABC with budgeting processes improves resource allocation, enhances cost management, and supports strategic initiatives aimed at improving profitability and competitiveness.

Using Budgets to Influence Employee Behavior and Goal Alignment

Budgets can be powerful tools for shaping employee behavior when used appropriately. For effective motivation, budgets should be designed to align employees' individual and departmental goals with overall organizational objectives. One approach is to set challenging yet achievable targets that incentivize performance while discouraging unethical practices such as cost manipulation. Incorporating performance incentives linked to budget achievement or improvements can motivate employees to work efficiently and innovatively.

Furthermore, fostering open communication about budget goals and providing the necessary resources and training fosters transparency and ownership. Recognizing and rewarding efforts that lead to cost savings and quality improvements reinforces desired behaviors. Additionally, involving employees in budget development increases their commitment and ensures that targets are realistic and relevant to day-to-day operations. Regular feedback sessions and performance reviews can track progress, address challenges, and recalibrate goals as necessary, ensuring continuous alignment and motivation.

Goal Alignment, Profitability, and Shareholder Value

Aligning individual and departmental goals with organizational objectives creates a cohesive effort toward profitability and growth. When employees understand how their roles contribute to company success, they become more motivated to optimize their performance. For example, if machine operators are aware that reducing downtime directly impacts profit margins and bonus eligibility, they are more likely to focus on efficiency. This alignment reduces conflicts and ensures all efforts support higher productivity and cost control.

Improved goal congruence enhances profitability by reducing waste, improving quality, and increasing throughput. As operational efficiency improves, profit margins tend to expand, leading to higher returns on investment. Furthermore, shareholder value benefits as consistent profitability and efficient resource management result in higher stock prices and dividends. Effective goal alignment also supports sustainable growth by promoting innovation and continuous improvement, which are vital for maintaining competitive advantage in dynamic markets.

ROI and Activity-Based Costing: Strategic Impact

Return on Investment (ROI) measures the efficiency of investments and is critical for strategic decision-making. ROI can be improved by identifying and focusing on high-margin products, optimizing resource utilization, and reducing unnecessary costs. An activity-based costing system enhances ROI analysis by providing detailed insights into the profitability of individual activities and product lines. Understanding the true cost drivers allows management to make informed decisions regarding product discontinuation, process improvements, and pricing strategies.

Implementing ABC can reveal areas where resources are over-allocated or wasteful, leading to better capital investments and operational adjustments. For instance, by accurately assigning overhead costs, management can determine the actual profitability of each product, avoid subsidizing low-margin items, and prioritize high-return projects. These improvements contribute to higher ROI, which, in turn, enhances free cash flow by increasing operational efficiency and reducing unnecessary capital expenditures. In summary, activity-based costing empowers strategic decisions that elevate financial performance and maximize shareholder returns.

Conclusion

Ferguson & Son Manufacturing Company's current budgetary control system exhibits several critical flaws that diminish its effectiveness, including punitive measures, misaligned incentives, and inadequate measurement of performance. Revamping the system to incorporate participative budgeting, performance-based metrics, and flexible budgets can foster a culture of continuous improvement and accountability. Integrating activity-based costing offers enhanced accuracy in cost management and strategic decision-making, ultimately improving profitability and ROI. Furthermore, aligning employee goals with organizational objectives through thoughtful budgeting practices can motivate workforce engagement and drive sustained growth. Overall, refining the budgetary control system and leveraging advanced costing methods will position Ferguson & Son for long-term success, shareholder value appreciation, and competitive advantage.

References

• Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. (2015). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (15th ed.). Pearson.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Cooper, R. (1998). Cost & Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Strategic Progress. Harvard Business School Press.
• Garrison, R., Noreen, E., & Brewer, P. C. (2018). Managerial Accounting (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Shank, J. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1993). Strategic Cost Management: The New Tool for Competitive Advantage. Free Press.
• Innes, J., & Mitchell, F. (2013). Activity-Based Costing: A Review with Case Study Illustrations. Journal of Accounting & Organisational Change, 8(4), 422–454.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Anderson, S. R. (2004). Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 131–138.
• Block, S. B. (2016). Managerial Accounting (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Anthony, R., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Gomes, A. M., & Perreira, S. C. (2020). Enhancing Profitability through Activity-Based Costing: Empirical Evidence from Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Cost Management, 34(2), 45–58.