Research Evaluation Worksheet Psych 610 Version 21 Universit

Research Evaluation Worksheetpsych610 Version 21university Of Phoenix

Research Evaluation Worksheet PSYCH/610 Version University of Phoenix Material Research Evaluation Worksheet Title: Full Article Reference (APA style): Abstract Introduction a. Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction? Explain by using information presented in the literature review. b. What is the research hypothesis or question? c. What are the variables of interest (independent and dependent variables)? d. How are the variables operationally defined? Method a. Sample Size (Total): ________________ Size Per Group/Cell: _______________ b. Were the methods and procedures described so that the study could be replicated without further information? What information, if any, would you need to replicate or reproduce this study? Participants a. How were participants selected and recruited? b. Were subjects randomly selected? c. Were there any biases in sampling? Explain d. Were the samples appropriate for the population to which the researcher wished to generalize? e. What are the characteristics of the sample populations? Research Design (check which design applies) _______ Single group, time series study _______ Multiple baseline (sequential) design: ______________ _______ Single group, no measurement _______ Single group with measurement: Pre ______ During _____ Post _____ _______ Two groups classic experimental versus control group, randomly assigned _______ (quasi-experimental) two groups experimental versus control group, not randomly assigned _______ Correlation research, not manipulated, degree of relationship _______ Descriptive research (qualitative study) _______ Natural observation _______ Analytical research _______ Interview research _______ Historical study _______ Survey research _______ Legal study _______ Ethnography research _______ Policy analysis _______ Fieldwork research _______ Evaluation study _______ Phenomenology _______ Grounded theory _______ Protocol analysis (collection and analysis of verbatim reports) _______ Case study, no measurement _______ Case study, with measurement: Pre _________ During _______ Post _________ _______ Developmental research _______ Longitudinal (same group of subjects over period of time) _______ Cross-sectional (subjects from different age groups compared) _______ Cross-sequential (subjects from different age groups, shorter period of time) _______ Correlation, more than two groups: control, treatment, and other treatment comparisons _______ Factorial design, two or more groups: other treatment differences, no untreated controls _______ Two or more dependent variables (MANOVA) _______ Other design: __________________________________________________________ Consider the Following Questions: a. Was a control group used? Yes ______ No ______ If yes, complete b, c, and d below. b. Was the “control†method for the study appropriate? c. What variable was being controlled for? d. In the case of an experimental study, were subject randomly assigned to groups? Measures a. Describe the Dependent Measure(s)/Instruments used: b. Describe the Measurement/Instrument Validity Information: c. Describe the Measurement/Instrument Reliability Information: Consider the Following Questions: a. For all measures (measures to classify subjects, dependent variables, etc..) was evidence of reliability and validity provided, either through summarizing the data, or by referring the reader to an available source for that information? b. Do the reliability and validity data justify the use of the measure? c. Are the measures appropriate (if not, why not)? d. Are multiple measures used, particularly those that sample the same domains, or constructs but with different methods (e.g., self-report, rating scales, self-monitoring, or direct observation)? f. If human observers, judges, or raters were involved, was inter-observer or inter-rater agreement (reliability) assessed? Was it obtained for a representative sample of the data? Did the two raters do their ratings independently? Was their reliability satisfactory? Independent and Dependent Variables a. What is/are the Independent Variable(s): b. What is/are the Dependent Variable(s): Data Analysis Scales of Measurement (check those that apply): Nominal _______ Ordinal _______ Interval _______ Ratio _______ a. What type of statistical techniques are used? b. What type of tables and graphs are used? Consider the Following Questions: a. Were tests of significance used and reported appropriately (e.g., with sufficient detail to understand what analysis was being conducted)? b. Do the researchers report means and standard deviations (if relevant) so that the reader can examine whether statistically significant differences are large enough to me meaningful? c. Other comments on the reported statistical analyses? Discussion Evaluate the Summary and Conclusions of the study (Usefulness): Describe the Strength(s) and Limitation(s) of the Study: Describe what you learned from the study: List any remaining questions you have about the study: *Adapted from form created by Dr. Randy Buckner, University of Phoenix Instructor Opinion for kendrick 4 posts Re:Module 5 DQ 1 The information in your prospectus will inform the development of your proposal. How does your prospectus inform the development of Chapter 1 of your proposal? Chapter 1 is developed from the components of Chapter 2 and Chapter 3. Explain why and how this is realized. How did you use the section criteria in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 to inform and align your Chapter 1? This is a very good question, after doing the prospectus draft and revising the prospectus draft and then reviewing the GCU doctoral network resources and notes, in addition to reviewing this week 5 lectures notes by Rowell (2017) GCU notes, it makes me think in honest fact, that I must go again to rework what the variables I am testing and going back to the conceptualization phase of my dissertation work. As noted by Rowell (2017) in week 5 lecture notes, the dissertation is a original research (scientific in nature) where it is a critical and scientific examination of any relationship between the variables. What are my variables? Emotional intelligence (independent variable or dependent variable) and the sales volume or sales performance (independent variable or dependent variable), these are key questions and conceptualization and operationalization issues that need to be addressed. In my mind, I know what I want to study, and where the dissertation should go, in the prospectus draft, I believe I addressed these issues, but perhaps, I still need to consult in the fact that, I will need to start from the point of identifying and solidifying this first. The literature review (chapter 2) and Methodology(chapter 3) will then come together more fluidly. Perhaps the prospectus will be more aligned in the components of chapter 2 and chapter 3 of the proposal phase. The templates certainly help and will assist in my prospectus and proposal drafts and based on any comments from the chair, this will certainly hone in on these drafts and then move forward. Reference(s) GCU. (2015). Proposal template. Retrieved from Hart, C. (1999/2008). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination . Thousan...

At the end of the cleaned instructions.