Research Methodology Presentation Assignment

Research Methodology Presentation Assignment Instructions

For this assignment, you will develop a PowerPoint presentation that addresses the gap in the research literature (for traditional research) or a noticed need in the field (for applied/action research). Your presentation will also address a related research question or problem informed by the research topic.

The topic of the presentation should align with the topic you identified in Discussion: Research Topic and in the Professional Publication Manuscript Assignment. Your proposed research design must include human participants and be of one of the design types presented in the Learn section for this course (do not attempt the following design types: mixed-methods, descriptive statistics only, meta-analysis, or text-only reviews). Data must never be collected without Institutional Review Board approval. You are only proposing a research study. Do not actually engage human participants or collect data.

Use past-tense verbs when discussing studies already conducted (i.e., from the research literature) and future-tense verbs to describe your proposed study. Review the Research Methodology Presentation Grading Rubric before submitting your presentation. Instructions The presentation must be 10–20 slides and must include the following elements:

• An introduction;
• A literature review section with citations;
• A theoretical or conceptual framework section with citations;
• Note: Be specific and describe how your study will be grounded. For instance, traditional research should include a theoretical framework, such as Social Cultural Career Theory, Expectancy-Value Theory, etc. Applied or action research should include a conceptual framework that attends to the basic foundation that frames your problem of practice.
• A section describing your proposed research question(s) and research design for advancing the body of knowledge for your topic;
• A section describing your proposed sample population, sampling strategy, sample size, and methods for ensuring a diversely represented sample; where will you derive your sample? How many participants would you need? Be specific.
• A section describing your proposed data gathering methods (for qualitative designs), data collection protocol, and instrumentation (for quantitative designs); Will you use an established measurement instrument like a survey or standardized test? Or create one based on existing curriculum or other factors? Mention this clearly.
• A section describing your proposed data analysis strategy (for qualitative designs) or statistical analysis (for quantitative designs);
• A section describing your plan for ensuring trustworthiness (for qualitative designs) or validity and reliability (for quantitative designs). Be specific about your analysis methods, such as coding data, thematic organization, triangulation, Cronbach’s alpha, etc.
• A references section citing at least five scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.

Ensure your presentation is easily readable, aesthetically pleasing, and professional. Incorporate graphics, images, pictures, or charts to engage your audience. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of a comprehensive research methodology presentation is a vital component in preparing researchers and scholars to articulate their planned studies effectively. This presentation serves as a detailed proposal that outlines the fundamental elements of the research, including its purpose, grounding framework, design, sampling strategy, data collection and analysis methods, and measures for ensuring trustworthiness or validity. Effective structuring and clarity can significantly influence the perception and critique of the proposed study, ultimately facilitating ethical approval and scholarly discussion.

At the core, the presentation must begin with an engaging introduction that contextualizes the research problem, elucidates its significance, and outlines the scope. This introduction sets the tone for the subsequent sections, establishing a foundation for understanding the research's relevance. The literature review section follows, synthesizing key research findings from peer-reviewed sources, with citations supporting the identification of gaps or needs within the field. This narrative underscores the rationale for the proposed study, framing it within the existing knowledge base.

Complementing the literature review is the theoretical or conceptual framework section. For traditional research, this involves a clear articulation of theories that ground the study; for example, Social Cultural Career Theory may inform a career development investigation, while Expectancy-Value Theory might underpin motivation research. For applied or action research, a conceptual framework that aligns with the identified problem of practice should be articulated, specifying the foundational assumptions guiding the inquiry. This section must include citations to support the framework choices, demonstrating scholarly rigor.

The subsequent component involves detailing the research questions and design. Precise articulation of research questions or hypotheses informs the methodological approach, whether qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods. The design should align logically with the questions, and the rationale for choosing a specific design type (e.g., phenomenology, case study, correlational) must be justified with scholarly references. This clarity ensures the study’s coherence and appropriateness.

Next, the presenter must specify the sample population, sampling strategy, sample size, and procedures for ensuring diversity. For example, selecting purposeful convenience sampling from a specific institution, with a target of a particular number of participants, demonstrates methodological transparency. Clearly articulating how the sample will be representative addresses issues of social responsibility and ethical considerations—aligning with the SCRIP criteria.

The data gathering methods section should specify whether established instruments, such as validated surveys or tests, will be used, or whether instruments will be developed anew, based on curriculum or other materials. Detailing data collection protocols ensures replicability and transparency. For qualitative designs, discussions should include procedures for interviews, focus groups, or observations, while for quantitative designs, the emphasis should be on measurement tools and data collection procedures.

In the data analysis section, the researcher must delineate how data will be processed and interpreted—coding procedures and thematic analysis for qualitative studies or statistical tests (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA, regression) for quantitative studies. Explaining how trustworthiness and validity will be established—triangulation, member checking, pilot testing, or reliability coefficients—underscores the study’s rigor.

Finally, a comprehensive references section citing a minimum of five current scholarly sources fortifies the proposal, illustrating engagement with the academic community and ensuring scholarly credibility. The entire presentation must be visually appealing and professional, utilizing visual aids strategically to enhance understanding and engagement.

References

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Gray, D. E. (2018). Doing research in the real world. Sage Publications.
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2018). Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson.
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
• Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research. University of Chicago Press.
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.
• Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications.