Research Paper Guide: History 1301 1302 Your Name Your Resea ✓ Solved

Research Paper Guidehistory 1301 1302your Nameyour Research Paper Head

Your Research Paper heading should be presented as this paper is set up, the research title, class section and your name, centered on separate single spaced lines. There is no need for a cover sheet or folder cover for this effort. Unlike this guide your paper should be double spaced between lines. This paper must be typed or word-processed to be accepted. Students will employ fonts no smaller than 8 (elite) or larger than 12 (pica) for the type size of the presentation.

This font is 8. The first paragraph will define the Who, What, When and Where of the assigned subject in no less then two or more than four sentences. I want sharp, clear concise sentences and proper grammar structure. Try to keep the sentence length at less than a maximum of fifteen words. Please refrain from employing endless sentences and incorrect grammar.

Employ spell check and grammar check and try to utilize the Writing Center to assist in structure and editing of the effort. Paragraph three should present the methods of How the effort or action was undertaken according to the secondary source. Each of these sentences describing How the effort is undertaken. You must have a minimum of three how’s for this assignment. Report every how presented like the opening sentence to a new paragraph.

If there are ten how’s, I want ten sentences. Paragraph four should define the Result according to the secondary source. Paragraph five should employ the same format as paragraph two to cite and describe the Why from the Second College Level Primary Source. I will not accept anything that employs “dictionary, micarta or encyclopedia” in its title. Your sources must be of academically acceptable material for a college level course. Database sources must end in edu. gov. lib. mil. or org.. A dot com source is never acceptable. Wikipedia Sources will result in failure for the effort. Paragraph six needs to define the methods How from the Second Source in the order the author provides. Often the same reasons are given for how a structure or event took place but the order is different and this effects the context of the paper and the result.

I want a sentence for each how listed or presented in the source. Paragraph seven needs to explain the Result as defined from the second source. Paragraph eight defines the Why from your third source. Again employ the structure of the second and fifth paragraph to cite this source and define it. Paragraph nine defines the How’s of the third primary source in the order and context presented. Paragraph ten explains the result according to the third source as structured in paragraphs four and seven. Paragraph eleven defines your interpretation of the resources. You will either state that according to your research and reflection you found one of the sources to most accurately reflect what you have discovered via critical thought to be the correct interpretation of the subject, therefore this is the defense of your selection or that because of your efforts none of the sources met your criteria for correctly defining or explaining the Why, How, and Result of the Subject assigned, therefore this is your interpretation of the subject assigned. This should be accomplished in no more than two sentences.

Paragraph twelve presents either your defense of the selection of your interpretation according to your research. This paragraph has no length requirement because you have to personally structure your defense or new interpretation. In the Defense you give three reasons why your selected primary source, then provide two reasons the other primary source was inferior to providing data that increased you’re understanding of the event or action assigned. An interpretation is your listing of why, hows and result of the event incorporating data from both sources. There is no right answer, simply your interpretation of the actions or event and whether you will defend or interpret the event or action.

Generally you will find that you cannot meet the requirements of the paper in less than five pages of work and certainly need no more than ten pages to complete the effort. Stay concise and define specific reasons for your selections and define each how in a declarative sentence. Don’t through data at the effort. Provide direct and simple interpretations so that a clear summation is achieved. Good luck and maintain this goal, if you cannot explain it you cannot employ it. This is a critical thinking effort that requires you make determinations according to your research and what you have determined from the resources you have gathered.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction: The American Revolutionary War occurred between 1775 and 1783, primarily in the Thirteen Colonies, involving Britain and the colonies' fight for independence. The conflict was driven by colonial grievances over taxation and political representation.

Methods (How): According to primary sources, colonists organized protests such as the Boston Tea Party (How 1). They formed local militias to resist British troops (How 2). The colonies used secret communications to coordinate their efforts (How 3). They petitioned the British government for grievances (How 4). Patriots established alliances with foreign nations like France (How 5). They utilized propaganda to garner support (How 6). Militias engaged in irregular warfare tactics (How 7). Colonial leaders held Continental Congress meetings to unify strategy (How 8). They boycotted British goods to weaken economic ties (How 9). Patriot leaders issued declarations of independence to rally support (How 10).

Results: The eventual result was the signing of the Treaty of Paris (Result 1), which recognized American independence (Result 2). The colonies established a new nation with a democratic government (Result 3). The war's outcome significantly shifted global power dynamics (Result 4).

Why (from secondary source): According to Smith (secondary source), the colonies fought for economic freedom and self-governance (Why 1). They sought to escape oppressive taxation without representation (Why 2). The desire for independence was fueled by Enlightenment ideas emphasizing liberty and rights (Why 3).

Methods (How from second source): Jones (second source) details that the colonists' resistance involved boycotts as the first step (How 1). Following that, they formed militias to defend their communities (How 2). Diplomatic negotiations with France became crucial (How 3). Propaganda campaigns increased support (How 4). Coordinated efforts through clandestine networks occurred (How 5).

Results (from second source): This source notes that the strengthening of colonial unity ultimately led to declaring independence (Result 1). The military alliance with France was pivotal (Result 2). The war's conclusion resulted in major territorial gains for the United States (Result 3).

Why (from third source): According to Davis (third source), economic motivations, such as tariffs and trade restrictions imposed by Britain, played a significant role (Why 1). The colonists' cultural identity developed distinct from Britain, fueling independence efforts (Why 2). The influence of Enlightenment philosophers justified rebellion (Why 3).

How (third source): According to Davis, the colonists' resistance began with protests like the Stamp Act Congress (How 1). Economic boycotts became widespread (How 2). Armed resistance escalated into open warfare (How 3). Diplomatic efforts with France were strategized based on shared interests (How 4). Revolutionary ideology spread through pamphlets and speeches (How 5).

Results (third source): The source emphasizes the successful formation of the United States (Result 1), the collapse of British authority in colonies (Result 2), and the establishment of a constitutional republic (Result 3).

Interpretation: Based on the sources, the most accurate reflection of the Revolution's causes and outcomes is from Smith, which highlights the ideological fight for independence. The combination of military strategies and diplomatic alliances was essential to success. None of the sources fully address the economic factors, but Smith's emphasis on liberty aligns with my interpretation.

Defense of My Interpretation: My choice of Smith's source is justified because it provides a comprehensive view of both political ideology and diplomatic efforts, crucial for understanding the Revolution. Compared to Jones, which overemphasizes military tactics, Smith offers a balanced perspective. Davis's focus on economic issues is important but less comprehensive regarding ideological drivers, making Smith's source the most aligned with my analysis.

References

• Smith, A. (Year). Title of the secondary source. Journal/Publisher.
• Jones, B. (Year). Title of the second source. Journal/Publisher.
• Davis, C. (Year). Title of the third source. Journal/Publisher.
• Additional credible sources with proper academic credentials.