Research Requirement Due November 16 Human Resource Manageme

Research Requirementdue November 16human Resource Management Hrm Re

Research requirement due: November 16. Students can choose between two options: (1) participating in one hour of HRM or Marketing research studies conducted by Fox School of Business faculty, either online or in person, and maintaining documentation of participation; or (2) writing a one-page single-spaced research summary of a scholarly article involving human subjects published in a specified set of academic journals, explaining how human subjects were used and how this contributed insight into consumer behavior. The paper must be submitted as a Word document via SafeAssign on Blackboard before the deadline, with no late submissions accepted. The article must be from the specified journals, and the summary must be original and at least one single-spaced page. Completion of either option results in an A grade; incomplete or unsatisfactory work results in an F. Questions should be directed to the provided email address. Participation in research studies requires registration through the SONA system, signing up for scheduled research sessions, and keeping documentation of participation for verification purposes. The due date for both options is November 16.

Paper For Above instruction

Participation in research activities within human resource management (HRM) and organizational behavior studies not only enhances academic learning but also provides practical insights into human behavior in organizational contexts. For this research requirement, students have two options to engage with or explore research effectively: participating in empirical research studies or critically reviewing scholarly articles involving human subjects. Both options aim to deepen understanding of research methodologies, ethical considerations, and the practical applications of human behavioral research in the fields of HRM and organizational behavior.

Option 1: Participating in Research Studies

This option involves students dedicating one hour to participate in ongoing research studies, facilitated by the Fox School of Business faculty through the SONA system. These studies may be conducted online or in physical campus locations, such as laboratories or classrooms. Participating students gain firsthand experience of research processes and ethical considerations involved when human subjects participate in social science experiments. Engaging in these studies allows students to comprehend how behavioral data is collected, analyzed, and applied in organizational settings.

Participation is straightforward: students register with the SONA system, select available studies, and complete their designated research hours. The process emphasizes the importance of punctuality and accountability, as students are responsible for maintaining documentation of their participation, which serves as verification for their academic records. This practical engagement illustrates the integral role of human subjects in understanding consumer behavior, employee motivation, leadership styles, and organizational dynamics.

Research studies often employ experiments, surveys, or observational methods involving human participation to uncover patterns of behavior, preferences, or decision-making processes. For example, experiments may assess leadership influence, teamwork, or job satisfaction, providing valuable insights for HR practitioners. Such involvement underscores the ethical framework guiding research with human subjects, including informed consent, confidentiality, and voluntary participation — principles central to conducting responsible research in organizational settings.

Option 2: Summarizing a Scholarly Article

Alternatively, students may choose to write a single-page, single-spaced paper summarizing a scholarly article published in the Journal of Applied Psychology, Personnel Psychology, Journal of Organizational Behavior, or the Journal of Management. The article must involve research with human subjects, and the summary should detail how human subjects were used and how their participation provided insight into consumer or employee behavior.

This approach emphasizes analytical reading and critical understanding of research design, methodology, and ethical considerations, such as how participants' data informs theoretical and practical conclusions. Students analyze aspects like experimental setup, participant demographics, measures used, and the implications of human engagement in generating valid and reliable knowledge about behavioral processes in organizations.

For example, an article examining how leadership styles influence employee motivation or how perceived organizational justice impacts job satisfaction would involve direct human participation. The summary should elucidate how such research advances understanding in HRM, illustrating the vital role of human subjects in producing applicable, evidence-based insights. Correct APA citation of the selected article must be attached to demonstrate academic integrity and adherence to scholarly standards.

The Significance of Ethical Human Research in HRM and Organizational Studies

Engagement with either of these options provides students with an appreciation for ethical research practices involving human subjects. Ethical standards ensure respect for participants' rights, privacy, and well-being, which is foundational in organizational research. The practice of obtaining informed consent, ensuring confidentiality, and minimizing harm positions the researcher as responsible and professional. Such principles are essential in HRM research because they uphold trust, legitimacy, and the integrity of findings that influence organizational policies and practices.

Furthermore, understanding how human subjects are engaged in research offers insights into the challenges and considerations that researchers face, such as managing biases, ensuring validity, and interpreting behavioral data accurately. These competencies are transferable to HR practice, where understanding employee perspectives and motivations is critical to designing effective HR policies and initiatives.

Conclusion

The research requirement offers a practical bridge between academic learning and real-world organizational insights. Whether through active participation in studies or critical review of scholarly articles, students enhance their understanding of research ethics, methodologies, and applications in HRM and behavioral sciences. These experiences foster a nuanced appreciation for how human subjects contribute valuable data, enabling organizations to develop more informed, ethical, and effective human resource strategies.

References

• Baron, R. A., & Harris, L. C. (2008). Organizational behavior: Understanding and managing life at work. Pearson Education.
• Greenberg, J. (2011). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1109–1132.
• Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2001). The impact of employee empowerment on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 319–328.
• Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72.
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Wiley.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podedoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
• Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance. Personnel Psychology, 44(4), 703–741.
• Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.
• Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1978). Equity theory and research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 267–299). Academic Press.
• Zohar, D., & Luria, G. (2003). The use of supervisory practices as leverage for safety climate development. Journal of Safety Research, 34(3), 231–243.