Residency Session Assignment ITS831 Information Technology ✓ Solved

Residency Session Assignment ITS831 Information Technology S

Residency Session Assignment ITS831 Information Technology Strategy in Planning. Deliverable: Conduct a literature review in Information Technology Strategic Planning. You can also conduct a literature review on Strategy and how it is applied to an Information Technology organization. Review the literature on Information Technology Strategic Planning and discuss problems and gaps identified in the literature. You will expand on the issue and how researchers have attempted to examine that issue by collecting data – you are NOT collecting data, just reporting on how researchers did their collection. As you read the literature, pick one issue that stands out in the literature.

Format: Cover: include the names of those who participated in the project. Table of contents: Use a Microsoft-enabled Table of Contents feature.

Background: Describe the issue, discuss the problem, and elaborate on any previous attempts to examine that issue.

Research Questions: In your identified problem area, what were the research questions that were asked?

Methodology: What approach did the researcher use, qualitative, quantitative, survey, case study? Describe the population that was chosen.

Data Analysis: What were some of the findings, for example, if there were any hypotheses asked, were they supported?

Conclusions: What was the conclusion of any data collections, e.g., were research questions answered, were hypotheses supported?

Discussion: Here you can expand on the research and what the big picture means, how do the results found in the literature review help organizations in the Information Technology strategy planning. What do you see as long-term impacts and what further research could be done in the field?

References: Include at least ten scholarly references in APA format. Sunday PowerPoint Presentation Your presentation will have a slide that addresses each • Cover • Topic • Background of the problem • Research Questions (if any) • Methodology • Data Analysis • Conclusion • Discussion • References

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

The strategic planning of information technology (IT) has long been framed as a critical driver of competitive advantage and organizational performance. A robust IT strategy is not merely a technology plan; it is an integrated governance mechanism that links business objectives to IT capabilities, ensuring that investments, projects, and processes contribute measurable value. In the literature, IT strategic planning is frequently positioned at the intersection of business strategy and IT capabilities, with the goal of achieving alignment, governance, and value creation (Henderson & Venkatraman, 1993). This review centers on the persistent issue of IT–business alignment during strategic planning and digital transformation, a topic repeatedly identified as a bottleneck for realizing IT value (Weill & Ross, 2004). Evidence from multiple studies suggests that misalignment reduces return on IT investments and delays or derails strategic initiatives (Kaplan & Norton, 1992).

Background

The core problem in IT strategic planning is the gap between formulated IT strategy and actual business outcomes. Researchers have proposed models, governance mechanisms, and maturity assessments to explain and address this gap. The Strategic Alignment Model (SAM) proposed by Henderson and Venkatraman (1993) emphasizes four domains—business strategy, IT strategy, organizational infrastructure, and IT infrastructure—and their mutual alignment. Subsequent work extended alignment concepts into governance structures, planning processes, and measurement systems (Weill & Ross, 2004). A recurring theme across the literature is that alignment is dynamic, requiring ongoing negotiation among stakeholders, clear decision rights, and performance metrics that tie IT activities to business value (Kaplan & Norton, 1992).

Research Questions

In the identified problem area, representative research questions include: What factors drive successful IT–business alignment during strategic IT planning? How do governance mechanisms influence alignment and project outcomes? What metrics best capture the value contributed by IT investments within strategic plans? How do organizations adapt IT strategy in response to rapid digital transformation pressures? These questions appear across multiple studies, often framed to understand the determinants of alignment, the role of governance, and the means of measuring impact (Henderson & Venkatraman, 1993; Luftman, 2003).

Methodology

The literature employs diverse methodologies, including qualitative case studies, quantitative surveys, and hybrid mixed-methods approaches. Case studies illuminate governance structures, stakeholder roles, and processes that enable or hinder alignment. Surveys quantify maturity levels, perceived alignment, and outcomes across organizations. The population studied typically includes CIOs, IT directors, business executives, and cross-functional teams involved in strategic planning. This spectrum of approaches provides a composite picture of how organizations attempt to align IT strategy with business objectives in different contexts and industries (Luftman et al., 1999; Sabherwal & Chan, 2001).

Data Analysis

Findings across the literature commonly report that alignment correlates with positive outcomes such as higher project success rates, better IT investment returns, and improved strategic execution. Hypotheses in several studies supported the connection between governance clarity, decision rights, and alignment. Some studies highlight contingencies: alignment is mediated by organizational size, industry, and the maturity of IT governance processes. Yet, common gaps persist, including inconsistent measurement of alignment, limited longitudinal data, and insufficient attention to value realization beyond cost savings (Tallon & Kraemer, 2000; Chan & Reich, 2007).

Conclusions

Overall, the literature converges on the conclusion that IT strategic planning benefits from a formal alignment framework, strong governance, and metrics that tie IT activities to business outcomes. However, the path to achieving sustained alignment is complex and context-dependent. Many studies demonstrate that misalignment tends to reemerge as business strategies evolve, underscoring the need for dynamic planning processes and ongoing governance adjustments (Henderson & Venkatraman, 1993; Weill & Ross, 2004). The evidence suggests that successful IT strategic planning requires clear accountability, integrated performance measurement, and governance that bridges the IT and business domains.

Discussion

From a broader perspective, IT strategic planning should be viewed as an ongoing capability rather than a one-off exercise. The big-picture implication is that organizations must cultivate a culture of continual alignment, guided by governance frameworks that enable timely decisions about IT investments, architecture, and project prioritization. Digital transformation intensifies the need for capability-based planning, where IT is mobilized to support new business models, customer experiences, and data-driven decision-making (Porter, 1985; Kaplan & Norton, 1992). Future research could explore longitudinal studies of alignment trajectories, the impact of emerging governance models (e.g., value-based IT governance), and the interaction between IT strategy and dynamic competitive forces in platform-based ecosystems (Henderson & Venkatraman, 1993; Weill & Ross, 2004).

References

  1. Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, W. (1993). Strategic alignment: A model for information technology and business strategy. MIS Quarterly, 17(1), 1–23.
  2. Luftman, J., Papp, D., & Brier, T. (1999). Enablers and inhibitors of IT alignment. MIS Quarterly Executive, 4(3), 35–58.
  3. Luftman, J. (2003). Competing in the Information Age: Aligning Business and IT Strategy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
  5. Weill, P., & Ross, J. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  6. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York, NY: Free Press.
  7. Tallon, P. P., & Kraemer, K. L. (2000). Uncovering the business value of information technology: A process-centric approach to IT alignment. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 59–85.
  8. Chan, Y. E., & Reich, B. H. (2007). IT alignment: What does it mean and how to achieve it? Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 69–75.
  9. Sabherwal, R., & Chan, Y. E. (2001). Alignment between business and information technology strategies: An empirical test of a contingency model. Decision Sciences, 32(1), 89–117.
  10. Galliers, R. D., & Leidner, D. E. (2004). Strategic information systems planning and management. Information Systems Journal, 14(3), 363–381.

Related Assignments