Respond To 3 Students' Discussion Using The RISE Model

Respond To 3 Students Discussion Using The Rise Modeldue Thursday Nov

Respond to three students' posts by applying the RISE model to provide meaningful feedback. Engage with each student’s ideas by reflecting, asking questions, suggesting improvements, and offering elevated perspectives to deepen learning and understanding.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of providing constructive feedback within educational settings is vital for fostering growth and deeper understanding. The RISE model—Reflection, Inquire, Suggest, and Elevate—serves as an effective framework for delivering feedback that is both meaningful and supportive. This paper discusses how to respond to three student discussion posts by employing the RISE model systematically, illustrating how each component can be used to enhance peer learning and critical thinking.

The first student, Courtney, discusses various research measures such as tests, surveys, interviews, and observations, and their applications within education. Reflecting on Courtney’s insights, I agree that multiple measures provide a comprehensive understanding of student performance. For example, combining standardized tests with questionnaires can reveal not only academic proficiency but also students’ attitudes and beliefs that influence learning. Inquire, I wonder how Courtney would suggest integrating qualitative and quantitative data when they appear to offer conflicting results? Suggest, to strengthen the discussion, I recommend Courtney explore research on data triangulation techniques, which combine different measures to validate findings. Elevate, perhaps she could incorporate specific case studies where mixed-methods approaches led to successful intervention programs, thus illustrating the practical application of these measures in real-life settings.

The second student, Stacy, emphasizes the importance of evidence-based assessments such as tests, observations, and interviews in measuring student and program outcomes. Her detailed explanation of observation techniques and the importance of eliminating bias contribute valuable insights. Reflecting on Stacy’s points, I agree that observer bias and context are critical considerations in data collection. Inquire, how might Stacy suggest addressing potential observer bias in naturalistic settings? Are there specific protocols or training that could improve objectivity? Suggest, I encourage her to discuss how technology, such as video recordings or automated data collection tools, might enhance the reliability of observational data. Elevate, exploring how these methods could be standardized further across different educators and settings could provide new avenues for ensuring consistency and fidelity in assessments.

The third student, Angie, highlights standardized tests and questionnaires as essential evidence-based assessments for informing educational practices. She illustrates their roles in identifying educational gaps and understanding student perceptions. Reflecting on Angie’s discussion, I concur that these assessments are fundamental for data-driven decision-making. Inquire, I am curious about how Angie might see the balance between quantitative assessments like standardized tests and qualitative methods like interviews helping to capture a holistic view of student needs? Suggest, she might consider integrating narrative assessments or student portfolios to offer richer, contextual insights alongside quantitative scores. Elevate, including recent research on culturally responsive assessment practices could deepen her understanding and application of equitable evaluation methods.

In conclusion, utilizing the RISE model when responding to peer discussions encourages thoughtful engagement. Reflecting on each student’s ideas affirms their contributions, asking questions stimulates further thinking, suggesting supports the development of deeper insights, and elevating broadens the conversation with richer context and examples. This approach not only fosters a collaborative learning environment but also enhances critical evaluation skills crucial for educational research and practice.

References

• McMillan, J. H. (2016). Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Hatch, T., & Hartline, J. (2022). The use of data in school counseling: Hatching results (and so much more) for students, programs and the profession (2nd Ed.). Corwin.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE Publications.
• Shadish, W., Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
• Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Pearson.
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
• Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
• Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage Publications.