Respond To The Following In A Minimum Of 175 Words 015349
Respond To The Following In A Minimum Of 175 Wordssharea Story Or Cre
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: Share a story or create a scenario where the incorrect leadership theory was used. Discuss how the situation could have turned out differently if another style was considered. In response to your peers, discuss how you would handle the situation outlined by your classmate based on your leadership style assessment from Week 1. How does this differ from your classmate’s approach?
Paper For Above instruction
In a corporate setting, a manager relied solely on transactional leadership during a major organizational change. Transactional leadership focuses on clear structures, tasks, and rewards or penalties, making it effective for routine tasks but less so in dynamic, complex situations. During a company restructuring, this leader emphasized strict adherence to procedures, tight supervision, and a focus on short-term performance. As a result, employee morale declined, innovation stalled, and resistance to change grew, ultimately hindering the success of the restructuring effort. The team felt micromanaged and undervalued, leading to decreased productivity and increased turnover.
If the leader had employed transformational leadership, the outcome might have been different. Transformational leadership encourages inspiring and motivating employees, fostering innovation, and creating a shared vision. By engaging employees in the change process, communicating a compelling vision of the future, and supporting individual development, the leader could have increased buy-in, reduced resistance, and promoted a more positive organizational culture. Emphasizing collaboration and recognizing employee contributions might have transformed a stressful transition into an opportunity for growth and renewal.
In responding to peers, I would handle their outlined situation by leveraging my democratic leadership style, which emphasizes participation and collaboration. I prioritize gathering input from team members, encouraging open dialogue, and making collective decisions. This approach can build trust and empower staff, leading to higher engagement and better ideas. For example, in a scenario where a team faces a challenging project, I would facilitate brainstorming sessions and ensure everyone’s voice is heard before making strategic decisions. This contrasts with my classmate’s more directive approach, which might focus solely on top-down instructions. While their style can be efficient in urgent situations, my democratic approach aims to foster long-term resilience, creativity, and morale among team members.
Overall, selecting the appropriate leadership style depends on the context and goals. While transactional leadership might be suitable for maintaining stability, transformational and democratic styles are often more effective during change and innovation initiatives, promoting a healthier and more adaptive organizational environment.
References
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Manual. Mind Garden.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in children. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 195-210.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press.
Hackman, J. R., & Johnson, C. E. (2013). Leadership: A Communication Perspective. Waveland Press.