Respond To The Following In At Least 185 Words

Respond To The Following In A Minimum Of 185 Wordsthe Components Of A

Respond To The Following In A Minimum Of 185 Wordsthe Components Of A

The components of a system are interdependent; therefore, the design phase is not a series of clearly defined steps. Even though work may start in one area, it will typically involve working with several different elements at a time. For example, a decision to change a report format might require changes in data design or input screens. The goal of systems design, however, is clear: to build a system that is effective, reliable, and maintainable. In your post, ensure you: Discuss what makes a system effective, reliable, and maintainable. Discuss how you evaluate if a system is effective, reliable, and maintainable. Accepting 3 tutor bids as I require 3 different submissions for this discussion.

Paper For Above instruction

A successful information system is characterized by its effectiveness, reliability, and maintainability. These components are essential for ensuring that the system performs its intended functions efficiently, remains operational over time, and is adaptable to organizational changes. An effective system accurately meets the needs of its users and achieves the desired outcomes with minimal errors. Effectiveness can be evaluated by examining whether the system fulfills its specified requirements, enhances productivity, and delivers accurate and timely information. User satisfaction surveys, performance metrics, and functional testing are common evaluation tools to assess these aspects.

Reliability refers to the system’s ability to operate consistently without failure over a specified period, even under varying conditions. A reliable system minimizes downtime and data loss, ensuring continuous availability of services. To evaluate reliability, organizations often monitor system uptime, error rates, and incident reports. Stress testing and fault tolerance assessments help identify vulnerabilities and ensure the system can withstand unexpected failures. Additionally, regular maintenance and updates are crucial to sustain reliability over the system’s lifespan.

Maintainability indicates how easily a system can be modified, upgraded, or repaired. A maintainable system simplifies troubleshooting, reduces the time required for updates, and accommodates new requirements without extensive rework. Evaluation of maintainability involves analyzing the system’s documentation quality, modularity, code readability, and ease of configuration. Techniques like code reviews, automated testing, and impact analysis of proposed changes help ensure maintainability. Ensuring that the system adheres to best practices in design and documentation enhances its long-term viability.

In summary, effectiveness is assessed by performance and user satisfaction, reliability through operational stability and error monitoring, and maintainability by ease of modification and manageability. Balancing these components during the design and evaluation phases ensures a robust system capable of supporting organizational goals sustainably.

References

  • Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2021). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Pearson.
  • Peppard, J., & Ward, J. (2016). The Strategic Management of Information Systems. Wiley.
  • Avison, D., & Fitzgerald, G. (2006). Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools. McGraw-Hill.
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
  • Brooks, F. P. (2010). The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley.
  • Bass, L., Clements, P., & Kazman, R. (2012). Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley.
  • ISO/IEC 25010:2011. Systems and Software Engineering — Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — System and Software Quality Models.
  • Pressman, R. S. (2014). Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Zimmermann, O., & Korherr, B. (2019). Software Maintenance and Evolution: Principles and Practice. IEEE Software, 36(4), 86–93.
  • Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. EBSE Technical Report.

Related Assignments