Respond To Two Of Your Colleagues With A Comment That Asks F

Respondtotwo Of Your Colleagues With A Comment That Asks For Clarif

Respond to two of your colleagues with a comment that asks for clarification, provides support for, or contributes additional information.

Tiesa Steen discussed the prevalence of pressure ulcers in her hospital and her research process, which included using CINAHL Plus, Education Source, and Google to gather scholarly articles focused on pressure ulcers and the Braden scale. She highlighted that the Braden scale helps predict patients at risk for pressure ulcers by assessing factors such as mobility and skin condition. Her explanation emphasizes that regular assessment and documentation are crucial in preventing pressure ulcers, along with the use of tools like the Braden scale. She also mentions that her workplace provides resources such as unit educators and online colleagues to support her research efforts.

Zandra Harrold explained her process of conducting a literature review on patient safety, medication errors, and quality care, utilizing databases like EBSCO Host and Medline. She emphasized narrowing her search to recent publications within the last five years to ensure current clinical relevance. She discussed challenges such as information overload and misinformation, which she mitigated by refining her search criteria and focusing on verified, peer-reviewed sources. Zandra also highlighted the importance of consulting nurse research specialists or nurse consultants to assist with literature searches, analyzing gaps, and applying findings in practice.

---

Paper For Above instruction

The process of conducting effective literature searches is fundamental in evidence-based nursing practice, as it directly influences the quality of clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. Both Tiesa Steen and Zandra Harrold illustrate essential strategies for navigating electronic databases, selecting relevant search terms, and overcoming common research challenges. Their experiences underscore the significance of using reputable sources and institutional support to enhance research productivity and validity.

Tiesa's approach showcases a structured method that involves selecting specialized databases such as CINAHL Plus and Education Source, which are tailored to nursing and health sciences. Her focus on combining search terms—for instance, “pressure ulcers” and “Braden scale”—helps narrow the scope and retrieve pertinent articles. Her mention of utilizing Google as an auxiliary search engine aligns with the understanding that broad search tools can be helpful if used judiciously to refine results. Tiesa also references specific studies, such as Almeida (2021), that reinforce the clinical relevance of her findings. This methodical approach underscores the importance of a targeted search strategy, which allows clinicians to gather high-quality evidence efficiently.

Similarly, Zandra highlights the importance of recent publications to ensure that clinical practice aligns with the latest research, especially within the last five years. She describes how she faced challenges related to information overload, a common obstacle in research, which she managed by narrowing her search parameters based on relevance and recency. Zandra’s emphasis on verifying sources through peer-reviewed journals reduces the risk of misinformation, a critical consideration in healthcare research. Furthermore, her recommendation to collaborate with nurse research consultants illustrates the need for interdisciplinary support in evidence synthesis. These professionals possess specialized knowledge that can streamline the research process, identify knowledge gaps, and facilitate application in clinical settings. Together, these examples emphasize that effective literature reviews require strategic planning, resource utilization, and collaborative support.

In clinical practice, the ability to efficiently locate and evaluate current evidence supports safe, effective, and patient-centered care. Strategies such as using targeted search terms, focusing on recent and peer-reviewed sources, and seeking expert assistance are essential skills for nurses involved in research and quality improvement initiatives. Education on these skills should be integrated into nursing curricula and ongoing professional development to foster a culture of continuous learning and evidence-based practice. Moreover, healthcare institutions should maintain access to comprehensive databases and encourage collaboration with research specialists to promote the dissemination and implementation of best practices.

Overall, the experiences shared by Tiesa and Zandra provide valuable insights into the evidence-based research process. Their narratives reinforce that overcoming challenges like misinformation and information overload requires deliberate strategies and supportive resources. As nursing continues to evolve within a dynamic healthcare environment, cultivating strong research skills among practitioners is critical for advancing patient safety and quality care.

References

• Almeida, A. G. P., Pascoal, L. M., Rolim, I. L. P. T., Santos, F. S., Santos Neto, M., & Lima de Melo, L. P. (2021). Relation between the diagnosis of pressure injury risk and the Braden scale. Revista Enfermagem UERJ, 29, 1–9.
• A.J., & J., K. (2020). A study on predictive value of pressure sore by the Braden scale in surgical intensive care units. International Archives of Integrated Medicine, 7(10), 100–105.
• Roetzel, P. G. (2019). Information overload in the information age: A review. Business Research, 12(2).
• Additional peer-reviewed sources relevant to literature review strategies, evidence-based practice, and use of databases.