Response Guidelines: Reply To Posts Of Two Peers In T 594781

Response Guidelinesreply To The Posts Of Two Peers In This Discussion

Respond to the posts of two peers in this discussion by sharing insights related to their application of research concepts, asking clarifying questions, or commenting on the relevance of their articles to your own professional interests. Each response should include at least two credible references.

Paper For Above instruction

The first peer presented a detailed analysis of research conducted by Chang et al. (2016) that investigates brain activity patterns in individuals with schizophrenia and their unaffected siblings. The study attempts to resolve conflicting findings in existing literature regarding whether schizophrenics exhibit excessive or incoherent brain activity. By utilizing measures such as amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and regional homogeneity (ReHo), the study examined spontaneous neuronal activity across three groups: individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, their siblings, and healthy controls. The research design was quasi-experimental, comparing these groups without randomization, which is typical in neuroimaging research where random assignment is not feasible (Sherperis, Young, & Daniels, 2010). The sample size—27 participants per group—limits the generalizability, but the study’s multi-group comparison adds robustness to its findings.

The study’s relevance extends to understanding the neurobiological underpinnings of schizophrenia, especially in exploring genetic or familial patterns of brain activity. Notably, prior research has shown inconsistent results—some indicating hyperactivity, others incoherent activity—highlighting the heterogeneous nature of schizophrenia. The use of advanced neuroimaging techniques like fMRI and resting-state analyses contributes to more nuanced insights into neuronal synchronization issues. The findings support the hypothesis that shared atypical brain activity could be a familial marker, emphasizing the importance of identifying biological endophenotypes (Gottesman & Shields, 2014).

In addition, Repovš and Barch’s (2012) study complements Chang et al. by examining functional connectivity during varying cognitive loads in schizophrenics and their siblings, further elucidating neurofunctional differences related to working memory. The convergence of these studies underscores the role of dysregulated neural networks in schizophrenia, and they suggest that familial patterns of brain activity could serve as biomarkers for genetic vulnerability. Future research with larger, more representative samples may enhance the reproducibility and application of these findings in clinical diagnostics or targeted interventions.

The second peer detailed the distinction between experimental and non-experimental research designs, providing specific examples. Using an experimental design, they discussed a study testing the effectiveness of trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) and parent interaction components on children exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV). This study involved pre-, post-, and follow-up assessments, with groups assigned to either a prep program or no-prep condition, enabling comparison of intervention effects. Data collection tools included validated questionnaires like the Trauma Symptom Checklist and Child Behavior Checklist, with analysis comparing outcomes over time.

The peer also described a non-experimental study examining the impact of combat exposure on soldiers and their families. This research relied on survey measures such as the PTSD checklist and HITS, focusing on the association between trauma exposure and symptoms like substance abuse, domestic violence, and secondary trauma. Because this study involved a specific military cohort utilizing self-report surveys, it exemplifies a non-experimental, correlational approach that identifies relationships without manipulating variables.

This comparison effectively highlights the core differences between experimental and non-experimental methods—control over variables and causal inference in the former versus naturalistic observation and correlational analysis in the latter. Both types of research are essential for understanding complex psychological and behavioral phenomena, particularly when ethical or practical limitations prevent experimental manipulation.

References

  • Gottesman, I. I., & Shields, J. (2014). Schizophrenia and genetics: The endophenotype approach. Cambridge University Press.
  • Sherperis, C. J., Young, J. S., & Daniels, M. H. (2010). Counseling research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Pearson Education.
  • Gandhi, S., & Cuevas, M. (2020). neuroimaging studies of schizophrenia: The promise of resting-state fMRI. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 112, 142-154.
  • Gao, S., et al. (2019). Functional connectivity in relatives of schizophrenia patients: A resting-state fMRI study. Biological Psychiatry, 85(2), 172-179.
  • Gottesman, I. I., & Shields, J. (2014). Schizophrenia and genetics: The endophenotype approach. Cambridge University Press.
  • Gould, T. D., et al. (2015). Implications of neuroimaging findings in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews, 40(6), 1180-1190.
  • Visser, M. M., Telman, M. D., Schipper, J. C., Lamers-Winkelman, F., Schuengel, C., & Finkenauer, C. (2015). The effects of parental components in a trauma-focused cognitive behavioral based therapy for children exposed to interparental violence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 15(1), 142.
  • Herzog, J. R., Everson, R. B., & Whitworth, J. D. (2011). Do secondary trauma symptoms in spouses of combat-exposed National Guard soldiers mediate impacts on their children? Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 28(6), 451–462.
  • Kalisch, R., et al. (2019). Advances in understanding the neurobiological basis of PTSD: Resting-state functional connectivity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 167.
  • Insel, T. R. (2014). The neurobiology of schizophrenia: perspectives from neuroimaging. JAMA Psychiatry, 71(3), 333–341.

Related Assignments