Responses To Each Question Should Range From 100–200 Words

Responses To Each Question Should Range From 100 200 Wordsyour Paper

Responses to each question should range from words . Your paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards (12 point Times New Roman font, double-spacing, 1" margins, title and reference pages). Be sure to use the text and/or other sources to support your responses and properly cite the use of such. What did Teresa learn?· Other than quitting, what can Teresa do to resolve the problem? What learning and perception factors should she consider as she analyzes the situation? If you were an outside consultant to the firm, could you recommend solutions that might not occur to Teresa or Vegas? What would they be?

Paper For Above instruction

The scenario involving Teresa presents a complex situation centered around workplace challenges, personal perception, and problem-solving strategies. From her experience, Teresa learned the importance of understanding the underlying issues within her work environment, including communication dynamics, organizational culture, and personal perceptions. Recognizing these factors is crucial for her to make informed decisions about her role and future actions. Instead of quitting, Teresa could explore options such as open dialogue with supervisors, seeking HR support, or negotiating modifications to her responsibilities. These actions require her to consider learning factors like emotional intelligence, perception biases, and conflict resolution skills. Understanding how cognitive biases influence her view of the situation can facilitate more effective problem-solving. As an external consultant, one might recommend solutions such as team-building initiatives, leadership development programs, or implementing anonymous feedback mechanisms to identify issues early. Enhancing organizational communication and fostering a culture of openness can preemptively address conflicts. Additionally, introducing employee assistance programs can provide support for personal challenges, enabling staff to deal with workplace stress proactively. Such strategies could lead to a healthier, more productive work environment, aligning with organizational goals and employee well-being.

References

  • Goleman, D. (2013). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam.
  • Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
  • McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2020). Organizational Behavior: Emerging Knowledge, Global Reality. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2019). Helping and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. In S. W. J. van Dijk, et al. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 39, pp. 175-205). Elsevier.
  • Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Pearson.
  • Schwartz, T. (2010). The Power of Full Engagement. Free Press.
  • Cook, J. M. (2018). Conflict Resolution in Organizations. Routledge.
  • Baumann, C., & Krings, F. (2022). Workplace Stress and Psychological Well-Being. Springer.
  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Gelfand, M. J. (2013). The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management. Psychology Press.
  • Harris, S., & Moran, R. T. (2019). Managing Cultural Differences. Routledge.

Related Assignments